Chapter 13 – Weather Effects on Oil Spill Countermeasures

Publisher Summary This chapter discusses the weather effects on oil spill countermeasures. Spill countermeasures are affected by weather conditions. Weather has been identified as one of the most vital factors in predicting oil spill fate and behavior. Bad weather is usually recognized as a condition that deters effective oil spill countermeasures. The most important factors influencing the performance of countermeasures are the wind and wave height. At sea level, the components of weather are its speed and wave length. Wind is the component which generates waves. Wind can also change the rate of surface drift of oil. For waves, the most important component to consider is the type of wave. Further, this chapter discusses booms and skimmers. Booms are the countermeasures which are affected by weather conditions. Skimmers show degradation of recovery potential with increasing wave height. This chapter also reviews the development of models for effective countermeasures. Literature data is the model that has been developed for effective countermeasures. The main advantage of this method is its production of an actual relationship between performance and the weather factor under consideration.

[1]  W. Koops,et al.  THE KATINA OIL SPILL 1982, COMBATING OPERATION AT SEA , 1985 .

[2]  T. Lunel Understanding the Mechanism of Dispersion through Oil Droplet Size Measurements at Sea , 1995 .

[3]  Alan A. Allen,et al.  Assessment of Potential Oil Spill Recovery Capabilities , 1999 .

[4]  J. R. Payne,et al.  SPILL-OF-OPPORTUNITY TESTING OF DISPERSANT EFFECTIVENESS AT THE MEGA BORG OIL SPILL , 1993 .

[5]  Larry Hannon,et al.  RESOLVING THE TOW SPEED THAT CAUSES BOOM OIL LOSS , 1995 .

[6]  Jr. Roy W. Hann UNIT OPERATIONS, UNIT PROCESSES AND LEVEL OF RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CLEANUP OF THE OIL SPILL FROM THE SUPERTANKER AMOCO CADIZ , 1979 .

[7]  Per S. Daling,et al.  DISPERSION OF CHEMICALLY TREATED CRUDE OIL IN NORWEGIAN OFFSHORE WATERS , 1983 .

[8]  Gerard A. L. Delvigne BARRIER FAILURE BY CRITICAL ACCUMULATION OF VISCOUS OIL , 1989 .

[9]  David C. Wooten,et al.  HIGH CURRENT CONTROL OF FLOATING OIL , 1975 .

[10]  A Castro,et al.  Floating boom performance under waves and currents. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[11]  N E Eryuzlu,et al.  USE OF FLOATING DEFLECTORS FOR OIL SPILL CONTROL IN FAST FLOWING WATERS , 1977 .

[12]  Tim L. Robertson,et al.  ESTIMATING THE RESPONSE GAP FOR TWO OPERATING AREAS IN PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND, ALASKA , 2008 .

[14]  M. R. Ouwerkerk,et al.  A NEW TOOL FOR LARGE-SCALE OIL COMBAT , 1995 .

[15]  Moye Wicks Fluid Dynamics Of Floating Oil Containment By Mechanical Barriers In The Presence Of Water Currents , 1969 .

[16]  Don Aurand The application of ecological risk assessment principles to dispersant use planning , 1995 .

[17]  Paul Hankins,et al.  FULL SCALE OIL CONTAINMENT BOOM TESTING AT SEA , 1995 .

[18]  Robert L. Watkins EFFECTIVENESS OF OIL SPILL RECOVERY SYSTEMS , 1995 .

[19]  J. H. Nash,et al.  COHERENT, PLUNGING WATER JETS FOR OIL SPILL CONTROL , 1981 .

[20]  Chris Turner,et al.  The role of wind and emulsification in modelling oil spill and surface drifter trajectories , 1994 .

[21]  A. Elliott,et al.  The Need for Operational Forecasting During Oil Spill Response , 2000 .

[22]  C. Guedes Soares,et al.  Modeling the fate of oil spills at sea , 1995 .

[23]  J. Bruce Smedley ASSESSMENT OF AERIAL APPLICATION OF OIL SPILL DISPERSANTS , 1981 .

[24]  James C. McWilliams,et al.  Vertical Mixing by Langmuir Circulations , 2000 .

[25]  C. E. Sweeney,et al.  Natural dispersion of oil , 1988 .

[26]  Donald C. Gates,et al.  OHMSETT TESTS OF THE TOSCON WEIR SKIMMER AND GRAVITY DIFFERENTIAL SEPARATOR1 , 1985 .

[27]  A. Keller,et al.  Effect of operational parameters on the recovery rate of an oleophilic drum skimmer. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[28]  K. M. Meikle AN EFFECTIVE LOW-COST FIREPROOF BOOM , 1983 .

[29]  David C. Wooten Mechanical Control of Oil Spills Utilizing a Streamlined Boom , 1973 .

[30]  Atle B. Nordvik,et al.  The technology windows-of-opportunity for marine oil spill response as related to oil weathering and operations , 1995 .

[31]  Frank J. Freestone,et al.  UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RESEARCH IN HIGH-SPEED DEVICES FOR THE RECOVERY OF THIN-FILM OIL SPILLS , 1975 .

[32]  Tharald M. Brekne,et al.  Optimizing Offshore Combat of Oil Spills – Development of New Booms and Helicopter Based Application of Dispersants , 2003 .

[33]  Michael A. Champ,et al.  Estimating Time Windows for Burning Oil at Sea: Processes and Factors , 2003 .

[34]  R. L. Beach,et al.  ENERGY DISSIPATIVE DEVICES TO CONTROL OIL SLICKS IN FAST-CURRENT ENVIRONMENTS , 1975 .

[35]  Kaufui Wong,et al.  Oil Spill Containment by a Flexible Boom System , 2003 .

[36]  R Schulze Oil Spill Response Performance Review of Skimmers , 1998 .

[37]  Aj Johnston,et al.  Can Oil Slicks be Contained , 1993 .

[38]  Victoria Broje,et al.  Interfacial interactions between hydrocarbon liquids and solid surfaces used in mechanical oil spill recovery. , 2007, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[39]  Ian Buist Window-of-Opportunity for In Situ Burning , 2003 .

[40]  Pavlo Tkalich,et al.  ACCURATE SIMULATION OF OIL SLICKS , 2001 .

[41]  D. S. Etkin,et al.  Estimating Cleanup Costs for Oil Spills , 1999 .

[42]  Lcdr James T. Leigh Oil Recovery on the High Seas , 1973 .

[43]  M. Fingas Oil Spill Dispersants: A Technical Summary , 2011 .

[44]  Merv Fingas A Practical Guide to Chemical Dispersion for Oil Spills , 2011 .

[45]  Dagmar Schmidt Etkin COMPARATIVE METHODOLOGIES FOR ESTIMATING ON-WATER RESPONSE COSTS FOR MARINE OIL SPILLS , 2001 .

[46]  I. C. White,et al.  A Review of the Problems Posed By Spills of Heavy Fuel Oils , 2001 .

[47]  Michael S. Bruno,et al.  EFFECT OF WAVES ON CONTAINMENT BOOM RESPONSE , 1995 .

[48]  Gordon P. Lindblom,et al.  OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR OPTIMUM DEPOSITION EFFICIENCY IN AERIAL APPLICATION OF DISPERSANTS , 1983 .

[49]  T. Lunel,et al.  THE BRAER SPILL: OIL FATE GOVERNED BY DISPERSION , 1995 .

[50]  William Edward Hazel,et al.  HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUES DURING COLD WEATHER OIL SPILL RESPONSES , 1997 .

[51]  Frédéric Muttin Structural analysis of oil-spill containment booms in coastal and estuary waters , 2008 .

[52]  D. J. Graham,et al.  Performance tests of four selected oil spill skimmers. Final report , 1978 .

[53]  Jan Rusin,et al.  THE NET ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFIT OF A SUCCESSFUL DISPERSANT OPERATION AT THE SEA EMPRESS INCIDENT , 1997 .

[54]  A. J. Johnston,et al.  OIL SPILL CONTAINMENT: VISCOUS OILS , 1993 .

[55]  Lee M. Hunt,et al.  A glossary of ocean science and undersea technology terms , 1965 .

[56]  Merv Fingas,et al.  An Overview of In-Situ Burning , 2011 .

[57]  James H. Nash,et al.  THE PERFORMANCE OF BOOMS IN AN OFFSHORE ENVIRONMENT , 1995 .

[58]  Chris Harris THE SEA EMPRESS INCIDENT: OVERVIEW AND RESPONSE AT SEA , 1997 .

[59]  Anton Schleiss,et al.  Dynamics of low-viscosity oils retained by rigid and flexible barriers , 2008 .

[60]  D. S. Etkin,et al.  Assessing Progress and Benefits of Oil Spill Response Technology Development Since Exxon Valdez , 2003 .

[61]  Georges Peigne ECUMOIRE II: EVALUATION OF THREE OIL RECOVERY DEVICES OFFSHORE , 1985 .

[62]  Arthur Widawsky DEVELOPMENT OF HARBOR OIL SPILL REMOVAL-RECOVERY SYSTEMS: PHASE I , 1975 .

[63]  John S. Farlow,et al.  OHMSETT RESEARCH OVERVIEW, 1979–1980* , 1981 .

[65]  John Harper,et al.  COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CLEANUP OF MARINE OIL SPILLS , 1995 .

[66]  Debra Simecek-Beatty,et al.  The Relation of Langmuir Circulation Processes to the Standard Oil Spill Spreading, Dispersion, and Transport Algorithms , 2000 .

[67]  R. W. Neal,et al.  THE DESIGN AND DEMONSTRATION OF A REMOTELY-CONTROLLED HIGH-SEAS OIL RECOVERY SYSTEM , 1975 .

[68]  James H. Getman PERFORMANCE TESTS OF THREE FAST CURRENT OIL RECOVERY DEVICES , 1977 .

[69]  Howard J. Lamp'l Lake Champlain: A Case History on the Cleanup of #6 Fuel Through Five Feet of Solid Ice at Near-Zero Temperatures , 1973 .

[70]  T. Lunel,et al.  DISPERSANT EFFECTIVENESS AT SEA , 1995 .

[71]  F. Muttin Oil spill boom modelling by the finite-element method , 2008 .

[72]  James R. Payne,et al.  Dispersant Trials using the Pac Baroness, a Spill of Opportunity , 1991 .

[73]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Langmuir Circulation and the Dispersion of Oil Spills in Shallow Seas , 2000 .

[74]  V. Bakthavatsalam,et al.  Windows of opportunity , 2001 .

[75]  Chang-Fa An,et al.  Animation of boom failure processes , 1996 .

[76]  T. Lunel Dispersant Pre-Approvals-Best Practice , 2001 .

[77]  H. B. Wilson DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF A WEIR BOOM FOR OIL RECOVERY AT SEA , 1981 .

[78]  Jerome Steen Milgram,et al.  MECHANICS OF A RESTRAINED LAYER OF FLOATING OIL ABOVE A WATER CURRENT , 1978 .

[79]  Wilbur Marks,et al.  THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF OIL SPILL CONTROL DEVICES1 , 1971 .

[80]  Günther F. Clauss,et al.  Efficiency of Selected Oil Skimming Systems in Irregular Seas , 1991 .

[81]  L. R. Beynon,et al.  Codes of Practice for Dealing with Oil Spills at Sea and On Shore: A European View , 1973 .

[82]  Atle B. Nordvik Summary of Development and Field Testing of the Transrec Oil Recovery System , 1999 .

[83]  Kaufui Wong,et al.  Oil Spill Boom Design for Waves , 2003 .

[84]  P. G. Jeffery,et al.  Large-Scale Experiments on the Spreading of Oil at Sea and its Disappearance by Natural Factors , 1973 .

[85]  Michael A. Champ,et al.  UTILIZATION OF TECHNOLOGY WINDOWS OF OPPORTUNITY IN MARINE OIL SPILL CONTINGENCY PLANNING, RESPONSE, AND TRAINING , 1997 .

[86]  Michael L. O'Brien AT-SEA RECOVERY OF HEAVY OILS - A REASONABLE RESPONSE STRATEGY? , 2002 .

[87]  Stephen Potter THE USE OF CONSENSUS-BASED STANDARDS TO IMPROVE OIL SPILL EQUIPMENT TESTING AND SELECTION PROTOCOLS , 2008 .

[88]  Ari Jolma,et al.  Dynamic mapping of nature values to support prioritization of coastal oil combating , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[89]  J. T. Turner,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE ROTATING DISC SKIMMER , 1987 .