Portfolio optimization as a learning platform for control education and research

This paper demonstrates the use of discrete time portfolio optimization as a mechanism for introducing students to key problems in systems theory: control, system identification, model reduction, and verification. Too often students are not introduced to systems theory until very late in their programs, frequently after they have already decided on majors and generated momentum toward specific career plans. One reason for this late introduction is the prerequisite material demanded by our systems courses, typically involving a chain of math, physics, and engineering courses. Using portfolio optimization as the vehicle for introducing systems theory, however, can provide an early introduction to some of the central issues in the field. In particular, the open-loop nature of portfolio optimization simplifies the decision-making context sufficiently to make these problems accessible to younger students. Moreover, the familiarity of financial decision making, regardless of technical background, allows a broad range of students to appreciate the importance and nature of these problems. Here we illustrate these ideas, using portfolio optimization to show how the presence of uncertainty and complexity in decision problems interconnect control, system identification, model reduction, and verification in the design of practical decision systems.

[1]  A. Stuart,et al.  Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. , 1960 .

[2]  Wen Yu,et al.  Stable synchronization control for two ball and bearn systerns , 2007, 2007 4th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering.

[3]  G. Dullerud,et al.  A Course in Robust Control Theory: A Convex Approach , 2005 .

[4]  Anton van den Hengel,et al.  Experiences with simulated robot soccer as a teaching tool , 2005, Third International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ICITA'05).

[5]  M. D. Wilkinson,et al.  Management science , 1989, British Dental Journal.

[6]  Katsuhisa Furuta,et al.  Control practice using pendulum , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[7]  B. Stone A Linear Programming Formulation of the General Portfolio Selection Problem , 1973, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[8]  S. Ahmed,et al.  A testbed for control schemes using multi agent nonholonomic robots , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology.

[9]  Fernando Paganini,et al.  A Course in Robust Control Theory , 2000 .

[10]  Li Jiao,et al.  Study On a Mixed Verification Strategy for IP-Based SoC Design , 2005, 2005 Conference on High Density Microsystem Design and Packaging and Component Failure Analysis.

[11]  C. Dougal,et al.  Competition Dynamics in a Virtual Fund Management System: The Tour de Finance , 2007, 2007 American Control Conference.

[12]  W. Sharpe OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS December 1971 A LINEAR PROGRAMMING APPROXIMATION FOR THE GENERAL PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS PROBLEM , 2009 .

[13]  Ahmet Bindal,et al.  An undergraduate system-on-chip (SoC) course for computer engineering students , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[14]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[15]  B. Pasik-Duncan Control-oriented system identification: An H∞ approach , 2002 .

[16]  Pramod Khargonekar,et al.  A Time-Domain Approach to Model Validation , 1992, 1992 American Control Conference.

[17]  J. Cockcroft Investment in Science , 1962, Nature.