Assessing the impact of real-time price visualization on residential electricity consumption, costs, and carbon emissions

The development of smart grid projects, with demand side management as an integral part, has led to an increased interest of households’ willingness to react to different types of demand response programs. This paper presents a pilot study assessing the impact of real-time price visualization on residential electricity consumption, and its effects on electricity costs and carbon (CO2eq) emissions. We analyze changes in electricity consumption based on a test group and a reference group of 12 households, respectively. To allow for analysis on load shift impact on CO2eq emissions, hourly dynamic CO2eq intensity of the Swedish electricity grid mix is calculated, using electricity generation data, trading data, and fuel-type specific emission factors. The results suggest that, on average, the test households shifted roughly 5% of their total daily electricity consumption from peak hours (of high electricity price) to off-peak hours (of low electricity price) as an effect of real-time price visualization. However, due to the mechanisms of the Swedish electricity market, with a negative relation between spot price and CO2eq intensity, the load shift led to a split effect; electricity costs modestly decreased while CO2eq emissions increased. In addition, any indication of the contribution of real-time spot price visualization to a reduction in overall household electricity consumption level could not be found, as the relative difference in consumption level between the test households and the reference households remained constant during both the baseline period and the test period.

[1]  Karin Alvehag,et al.  Further exploring the potential of residential demand response programs in electricity distribution , 2014 .

[2]  P. Eng CO2 emissions from fuel combustion: highlights , 2009 .

[3]  Mohammed H. Albadi,et al.  A summary of demand response in electricity markets , 2008 .

[4]  L. Nordström,et al.  Including dynamic CO2 intensity with demand response , 2014 .

[5]  H. Farhangi,et al.  The path of the smart grid , 2010, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[6]  A. Nilsson,et al.  Effects of continuous feedback on households’ electricity consumption: Potentials and barriers , 2014 .

[7]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Demand side management: Benefits and challenges ☆ , 2008 .

[8]  undefined Manoël Rekinger,et al.  Global Market Outlook for Solar Power 2015-2019 , 2014 .

[9]  Danièle Revel,et al.  IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation , 2011 .

[10]  Alessandra Parisio,et al.  Estimating the impacts of demand response by simulating household behaviours under price and CO2 signals , 2014 .

[11]  Farrokh Albuyeh,et al.  Grid of the future , 2009, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[12]  Aie CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2011 , 2011 .

[13]  Zhao Xu,et al.  Demand as Frequency Controlled Reserve , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Susan Krumdieck,et al.  Price, environment and security: Exploring multi-modal motivation in voluntary residential peak demand response , 2011 .

[15]  Kelum A. A. Gamage,et al.  Demand side management in smart grid: A review and proposals for future direction , 2014 .

[16]  I. Vassileva,et al.  Introducing a demand-based electricity distribution tariff in the residential sector: Demand response and customer perception , 2011 .

[17]  Gerard Doorman,et al.  An analysis of a demand charge electricity grid tariff in the residential sector , 2010 .

[18]  B.F. Wollenberg,et al.  Toward a smart grid: power delivery for the 21st century , 2005, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.