Compressive sensing of digital sparse signals

This paper discusses compressive sensing with digital sparse signals. The motivation is that most existing sparse signal recovery algorithms, like matching pursuit, convex relaxation and Bayesian framework, do not fully exploit the digital nature of signals when dealing with digital sparse signals, which result in certain performance losses. In this paper, we solve this problem via a permutation-based multi-dimensional sensing matrix and an iterative recovery algorithm with maximum likelihood (ML) local detectors. The sensing matrix considered consists of several sub-matrices, each composed of a random permutation matrix and a block-diagonal matrix. The measurements generated from the same permutation matrix are referred to as a dimension. The block-diagonal matrices allow the use of the low-complexity ML detector in each dimension, which best utilizes the digital nature of signals. The multi-dimensional structure of the sensing matrix enables information exchange between dimensions through an iterative process to achieve a near global-optimal estimation. Numerical results are used to show the rate-distortion performance of the proposed technique. It is shown that it can achieve much better rate-distortion than the existing approaches based on convex relaxation and Bayesian framework with digital source signals.

[1]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Sharp Thresholds for High-Dimensional and Noisy Sparsity Recovery Using $\ell _{1}$ -Constrained Quadratic Programming (Lasso) , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Just relax: convex programming methods for identifying sparse signals in noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  George Eastman House,et al.  Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevan e Ve tor Ma hine , 2001 .

[4]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Compressive Sensing , 2008, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[5]  A. Glavieux,et al.  Near Shannon limit error-correcting coding and decoding: Turbo-codes. 1 , 1993, Proceedings of ICC '93 - IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[6]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[7]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Bayesian Compressive Sensing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  Alain Glavieux,et al.  Reflections on the Prize Paper : "Near optimum error-correcting coding and decoding: turbo codes" , 1998 .

[10]  Y. C. Pati,et al.  Orthogonal matching pursuit: recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition , 1993, Proceedings of 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[11]  R. Gribonval,et al.  Highly sparse representations from dictionaries are unique and independent of the sparseness measure , 2007 .

[12]  Ronald A. DeVore,et al.  Some remarks on greedy algorithms , 1996, Adv. Comput. Math..