Third‐person effect, gender differences, pornography exposure and support for restriction of pornography

The interrelationship of the factors that influence attitudes in support of restrictions on pornography are explored in this study. From data gathered in a survey of Taiwanese high school students, a model is constructed to depict these relationships. Although both male and females subjects perceived pornography to have greater negative influence on others than on themselves, females who had a lower level of past exposure to pornography perceived greater negative effects of pornography on others than did male respondents. Findings also supported the hypotheses that gender, lower level of past exposure and perceived negative effects all are related to an attitude that favours control of pornography.

[1]  New York Teachers , 1894 .

[2]  V. B. Cline,et al.  Desensitization of children to television violence. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  E. C. Shirkey,et al.  Correlates of support for censorship of sexual, sexually violent, and violent media , 1994 .

[4]  L. Eron,et al.  The mass media and youth aggression. , 1994 .

[5]  Andrea Dworkin Pornography: Men Possessing Women , 1981 .

[6]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  Overrating the X‐Rating: The Third‐Person Perception and Support for Censorship of Pornography , 1995 .

[7]  D. Kenrick Sex differences, androgyny, and approach responses to erotica: A new variation on the old volunteer problem. , 1980 .

[8]  Richard M. Perloff,et al.  THIRD-PERSON EFFECT RESEARCH 1983–1992: A REVIEW AND SYNTHESIS , 1993 .

[9]  S. Chaffee,et al.  Regulating Pornography: A Public Dilemma , 1990 .

[10]  N. Malamuth Sexually Explicit Media, Gender Differences, and Evolutionary Theory , 1996 .

[11]  W. C. Wilson,et al.  Experience with and Attitudes toward Explicit Sexual Materials1 , 1973 .

[12]  Mike Allen,et al.  Exposure to Pornography and Acceptance of Rape Myths , 1992 .

[13]  James V.P. Check,et al.  The Effects of Mass Media Exposure on Acceptance of Violence against Women: A Field Experiment. , 1981 .

[14]  Richard M. Perloff,et al.  The Third Person Effect: A Critical Review and Synthesis , 1999 .

[15]  V. Lo,et al.  Exposure of Taiwanese adolescents to pornographic media and its impact on sexual attitudes and behaviour , 1999 .

[16]  G. Dines,et al.  Pornography: The Production and Consumption of Inequality , 1997 .

[17]  Ang Peng Hwa,et al.  PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF TELEVISION INFLUENCE AND OPINIONS ABOUT CENSORSHIP IN SINGAPORE , 1996 .

[18]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  What We Think Others Think , 1991 .

[19]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Susceptibility and Severity , 1999 .

[20]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Support for Censorship of Violent and Misogynic Rap Lyrics , 1997 .

[21]  James B. Weaver,et al.  Pornography and men's sexual callousness toward women. , 1989 .

[22]  N. Malamuth,et al.  Penile Tumescence and Perceptual Responses to Rape as a Function of Victim's Perceived Reactions1 , 1980 .

[23]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Rethinking the Social Distance Corollary , 1999 .

[24]  D. Byrne,et al.  Sex Differences in Response to Erotica? Love Versus Lust , 1978 .

[25]  W. Davison The Third-Person Effect in Communication , 1983 .

[26]  Michel Dupagne,et al.  The Third-Person Effect , 1999 .

[27]  D. Thiessen Environmental tracking by females , 1994, Human nature.

[28]  Rick Hense,et al.  The Development of the Attitudes Toward Censorship Questionnaire1 , 1992 .

[29]  Cynthia A. Hoffner,et al.  Support for Censorship of Television Violence , 1999 .

[30]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  PERCEIVED IMPACT OF DEFAMATION AN EXPERIMENT ON THIRD-PERSON EFFECTS , 1988 .

[31]  Daniel Linz,et al.  The Effects of Multiple Exposures to Filmed Violence Against Women , 1984 .

[32]  Paul D. Driscoll,et al.  Consequences of third‐person perception in support of press restrictions in the O. J. Simpson trial , 1997 .

[33]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  FOR THE GOOD OF OTHERS: CENSORSHIP AND THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT , 1996 .

[34]  M. Herrman,et al.  Attitudes Toward Pornography in a Southern Community , 1983 .

[35]  Charles T. Salmon,et al.  THE ‘OTHER’ AS THE VULNERABLE VOTER: A STUDY OF THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT IN THE 1988 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN , 1990 .

[36]  Ven-Hwei Lo,et al.  Third-Person Effect, Gender, and Pornography on the lnternet , 2002 .

[37]  羅文輝,et al.  The third person perception and support for restriction of pornography: Some methodological problems , 2000 .