The Impact of Product, Market, and Relationship Characteristics on Interorganizational System Integration in Manufacturer-Supplier Dyads

Firms are increasingly using collaborative systems to enhance supply-chain visibility. A key emphasis of these interorganizational systems (IOS) is to improve the coordination between buyers and suppliers through electronic integration. While such IOS integration is purportedly good, because it tightens linkages in the supply chain, it is not clear whether it is the best configuration under all conditions. A review of literature on adoption and use of electronic data interchange (EDI) systems (a type of IOS) shows that this issue has been examined from multiple theoretic perspectives. Researchers have examined how contingencies related to technology, organization, and environment shape EDI use. Limited attention has been directed toward understanding how conditions under which transactions are conducted impact the use of IOS. We argue that transactional characteristics are important antecedents to IOS integration and propose that demand uncertainty, complexity, market fragmentation, and market volatility capture key characteristics. These factors coupled with an open information-sharing environment are hypothesized to influence IOS integration. Data collected from the electronics industry is used to examine the research model. Results show that firms tend to deploy integrated IOS when complexity of the component is high, market fragmentation is low, and an open information-sharing environment exists. Thus, from a managerial perspective, IOS integration is the appropriate configuration under conditions of high product complexity and open information-sharing environment, but it precludes the firm from participating in the open market and gaining brokerage benefits.

[1]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Information Processing View of Organizations: An Exploratory Examination of Fit in the Context of Interorganizational Relationships , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  V. Grover An Empirically Derived Model for the Adoption of Customer‐based Interorganizational Systems* , 1993 .

[3]  Sree Nilakanta,et al.  Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Emerging Electronic Partnerships: Antecedents and Dimensions of EDI Use from the Supplier's Perspective , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Noel Plumridge,et al.  Suspicious Minds , 2011 .

[6]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[7]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  The Shadow Of The Future: Effects Of Anticipated Interaction And Frequency Of Contact On Buyer-Seller Cooperation , 1992 .

[8]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[9]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Strategic Payoff from EDI as a Function of EDI Embeddedness , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  J. Stock,et al.  Adoption and implementation of technological innovations within long-term relationships , 2003 .

[11]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  The Role of Interorganizational and Organizational Factors on the Decision Mode for Adoption of Interorganizational Systems , 1995 .

[12]  Kyung Kyu Kim,et al.  An Assessment of Electronic Information Transfer in B2B Supply-Channel Relationships , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Kai Lung Hui,et al.  Determinants of Small Business EDI Adoption: An Empirical Investigation , 2001, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[14]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[15]  Benn R. Konsynski,et al.  Uses and Consequences of Electronic Markets: An Empirical Investigation in the Aircraft Parts Industry , 1998, MIS Q..

[16]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  Transaction Cost Analysis: Past, Present, and Future Applications , 1997 .

[17]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Measuring the Extent of EDI Usage in Complex Organizations: Strategies and Illustrative Examples , 1996, MIS Q..

[18]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Determinants of Electronic Integration in the Insurance Industry: An Empirical Test , 1994 .

[19]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective , 2003, MIS Q..

[20]  Vivek Choudhury,et al.  Strategic Choices in the Development of Interorganizational Information Systems , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation , 2001 .

[22]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[23]  Sridhar Narasimhan,et al.  Effects of Relational Factors and Channel Climate on EDI Usage in the Customer-Supplier Relationship , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  James F. Courtney,et al.  VIEWING EDI-ENABLED INTERORGANIZATIONALRELATIONSHIPS THROUGH MULTIPLECONCEPTUAL LENSES , 2002 .

[25]  Jan B. Heide Interorganizational Governance in Marketing Channels , 1994 .

[26]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[27]  Varun Grover,et al.  Examining the Impact of Interorganizational Systems on Process Efficiency and Sourcing Leverage in Buyer-Supplier Dyads , 2005, Decis. Sci..

[28]  John R. Nevin,et al.  Performance Outcomes of Purchasing Arrangements in Industrial Buyer-Vendor Relationships , 1990 .

[29]  Shannon W. Anderson,et al.  Using Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) to Improve the Efficiency of Accounting Transactions , 2002 .

[30]  M. Hobday Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation , 1998 .

[31]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.

[32]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on the Organization of Economic Activity: The "Move to the Middle" Hypothesis , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Measuring the impact of organizational constraints on the success of business-to-business e-commerce efforts: a transactional focus , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[34]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Ajit Kambil,et al.  Transforming the Marketspace with All-in-One Markets , 1999, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[36]  Kyung Kyu Kim,et al.  An empirical investigation of electronic integration in a supply chain relationship , 1999, ICIS.

[37]  Varun Grover,et al.  Investigating the Role of Information Technology in Building Buyer-Supplier Relationships , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Rachna Shah,et al.  Aligning supply chain management characteristics and interorganizational information system types: an exploratory study , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[39]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Configurations of inter-organizational relationships : a comparison between US and Japanese automakers , 1995 .

[40]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[41]  Mani Subramani,et al.  How Do Suppliers Benefit from Information Technology Use in Supply Chain Relationships? , 2004, MIS Q..

[42]  Milton Harris,et al.  Organization Design , 2000, Manag. Sci..

[43]  G. Walker,et al.  A Transaction Cost Approach to Make-or-Buy Decisions , 1984 .

[44]  M. Bensaou,et al.  Interorganizational Cooperation: The Role of Information Technology an Empirical Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Supplier Relations , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..