Three-Dimensional Morphology of the Distal Part of the Femur Viewed in Virtual Reality

The morphologic shape of the distal part of the femur dictates the shape, orientation, and kinematics of prosthetic total knee replacement. Traditional prosthetic designs incorporate symmetric femoral condyles with a centered trochlear groove. Traditional surgical techniques center the femoral component to the distal part of the femur and position it relative to various bone landmarks. However, failure patterns documented in retrieval studies1,2, case series3, and kinematic studies demonstrate how traditional designs and surgical techniques reflect a poor understanding of distal femoral morphology and knee kinematics. It has been shown that the flexion/extension axis of the knee is fixed within the femur and that the articular surfaces of the condyles are circular in profile4,5. Ligament length patterns are significantly altered by abnormal axial alignment when a hinged knee brace is used6. It is expected that a malaligned femoral component would have the same effect in total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this report is to demonstrate, with conventional images and with interactive animations in virtual reality, the three-dimensional shape of the naturally asymmetric distal part of the femur, with illustration of the sulcus axis of the trochlear groove and the flexion/extension axis of the condyles relative to conventional axes (mechanical, anatomic, epicondylar, and posterior condylar). Correlations between the morphologically determined rotation axes and experimentally determined kinematic axes are illustrated. Eighty-five mummified cadaveric knees were measured with a stereotactic micrometer (Fig. 1)7. The location and orientation of the sulcus were obtained by repeated horizontal passes of the stereotactic stylus over the distal part of the femur, beginning at the top of the articular surface and progressing down to the intercondylar notch (Fig. 2). With each horizontal pass, the lowest depression of the trochlea (sulcus) was identified by …

[1]  M L Hull,et al.  Implementation of a five degree of freedom automated system to determine knee flexibility in vitro. , 1990, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  D. Eckhoff,et al.  Femorotibial offset. A morphologic feature of the natural and arthritic knee. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  D. Eckhoff,et al.  Knee Version Associated With Anterior Knee Pain , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  P S Walker,et al.  The effects of knee brace hinge design and placement on joint mechanics. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Maury L. Hull,et al.  A new load application system for in vitro study of ligamentous injuries to the human knee joint. , 1995 .

[6]  D. Eckhoff,et al.  Location of the femoral sulcus in the osteoarthritic knee. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  The Axes of Rotation of the Knee , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  D. Eckhoff,et al.  Version of the osteoarthritic knee. , 1994, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  V. Goldberg,et al.  The effect of alignment of the implant on fractures of the patella after condylar total knee arthroplasty. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  R. Bourne,et al.  Posteromedial tibial polyethylene failure in total knee replacements. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  V. Spitzer,et al.  Sulcus Morphology of the Distal Femur , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  J O Galante,et al.  Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.