Using decision mapping to inform the development of a stated choice survey to elicit youth preferences for sexual and reproductive health and HIV services in rural Malawi.

The process of designing and developing discrete choice experiments (DCEs) is often under reported. The need to adequately report the results of qualitative work used to identify attributes and levels used in a DCE is recognised. However, one area that has received relatively little attention is the exploration of the choice question of interest. This paper provides a case study of the process used to design a stated preference survey to assess youth preferences for integrated sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and HIV outreach services in Malawi. Development and design consisted of six distinct but overlapping and iterative stages. Stage one was a review of the literature. Stage two involved developing a decision map to conceptualise the choice processes involved. Stage three included twelve focus group discussions with young people aged 15-24 (n = 113) and three key informant interviews (n = 3) conducted in Ntcheu District, Malawi. Stage four involved analysis of qualitative data and identification of potential attributes and levels. The choice format and experimental design were selected in stages five and six. The results of the literature review were used to develop a decision map outlining the choices that young people accessing SRH services may face. For youth that would like to use services two key choices were identified: the choice between providers and the choice of service delivery attributes within a provider type. Youth preferences for provider type are best explored using a DCE with a labelled design, while preferences for service delivery attributes associated with a particular provider are better understood using an unlabelled design. Consequently, two DCEs were adopted to jointly assess preferences in this context. Used in combination, the results of the literature review, the decision mapping process and the qualitative work provided robust approach to designing the DCEs individually and as complementary pieces of work.

[1]  J. Louviere,et al.  Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[2]  M. Bliemer,et al.  Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations , 2010 .

[3]  Mandy Ryan,et al.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. , 2012, Health economics.

[4]  Mandy Ryan,et al.  Discrete choice experiments in a nutshell , 2008 .

[5]  C. Nzioka Unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection among young women in rural Kenya , 2004, Culture, health & sexuality.

[6]  A. Biddlecom,et al.  Qualitative Evidence on Adolescents' Views of Sexual and Reproductive Health in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2005 .

[7]  Susheela Singh,et al.  Adolescents' views of and preferences for sexual and reproductive health services in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi and Uganda. , 2007, African journal of reproductive health.

[8]  A. Erulkar,et al.  What is youth-friendly? Adolescents' preferences for reproductive health services in Kenya and Zimbabwe. , 2005, African journal of reproductive health.

[9]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[10]  V. Rasch,et al.  Adolescent girls with illegally induced abortion Dar es Salaam: The discrepancy between sexual behaviour and lack of access to contraception , 2000, Reproductive health matters.

[11]  E. Ekanem,et al.  Sources of Contraceptive Commodities for Users in Nigeria , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[12]  Joanna Coast,et al.  Developing attributes and levels for discrete choice experiments using qualitative methods , 2007, Journal of health services research & policy.

[13]  David Parkin,et al.  Economic Analysis in Health Care , 2007 .

[14]  Mickael Bech,et al.  Designing a stated choice experiment: The value of a qualitative process , 2012 .

[15]  R. Hogg,et al.  Perceptions of HIV and Fertility Among Adolescents in Soweto, South Africa: Stigma and Social Barriers Continue to Hinder Progress , 2009, Aids and Behavior.

[16]  M. Lundström,et al.  Waiting for cataract surgery – effects of a maximum waiting-time guarantee , 2007, Journal of health services research & policy.

[17]  C. Nzioka Perspectives of adolescent boys on the risks of unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections: Kenya , 2001, Reproductive health matters.

[18]  L. Laing,et al.  Adolescent reproductive health in Uganda: Issues related to access and quality of care , 2007, International journal of adolescent medicine and health.

[19]  S. Guttmacher,et al.  The quality of HIV testing services for adolescents in Cape Town, South Africa: do adolescent-friendly services make a difference? , 2009, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[20]  J. Louviere,et al.  Discrete Choice Experiments Are Not Conjoint Analysis , 2010 .

[21]  H. Rees,et al.  “You Must Do the Test to Know Your Status”: Attitudes to HIV Voluntary Counseling and Testing for Adolescents Among South African Youth and Parents , 2008, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[22]  J. Willis Foundations of Qualitative Research: Interpretive and Critical Approaches , 2007 .

[23]  L. Hulton,et al.  Perceptions of the risks of sexual activity and their consequences among Ugandan adolescents. , 2000, Studies in family planning.

[24]  A. Fatusi,et al.  STI treatment-seeking behaviors among youth in Nigeria: are there gender differences? , 2010, International perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[25]  Mandy Ryan,et al.  Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care , 2008 .

[26]  L. Atuyambe,et al.  Experiences of pregnant adolescents--voices from Wakiso district, Uganda. , 2005, African health sciences.

[27]  R. Jewkes,et al.  Blood Blockages and Scolding Nurses: Barriers to Adolescent Contraceptive Use in South Africa , 2006, Reproductive health matters.

[28]  Joanna Coast,et al.  Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations. , 2012, Health economics.

[29]  C. Naré,et al.  REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH KNOWLEDGE AND USE OF SERVICES AMONG YOUNG ADULTS IN DAKAR, SENEGAL , 2002, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[30]  W. Kipp,et al.  ‘We want someone with a face of welcome’: Ugandan adolescents articulate their family planning needs and priorities , 2005, Tropical doctor.

[31]  Y. Berhane,et al.  Adolescents' health service utilization pattern and preferences: Consultation for reproductive health problems and mental stress are less likely , 2005 .

[32]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Designing Discrete Choice Experiments: Do Optimal Designs Come at a Price? , 2008 .

[33]  R. Magnani,et al.  Does making clinic-based reproductive health services more youth-friendly increase service use by adolescents? Evidence from Lusaka, Zambia. , 2003, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.