The cost of quality: Reducing ASIC defects with I/sub DDQ/, at-speed testing, and increased fault coverage

This paper attempts to quantify the economic benefits of including improved design for test (DFT) strategies into the ASIC design process. The qualitative results of higher stuck-at fault coverage, I/sub DDQ/ testing, and BIST, have been documented; the quantitative results and their economic impact have not. This paper presents real life costs associated with poor quality in order to justify the resource investments needed to support improved DFT strategies.<<ETX>>

[1]  Prathima Agrawal,et al.  Fault coverage requirement in production testing of LSI circuits , 1982 .

[2]  Charles F. Hawkins,et al.  IDDQ testing: A review , 1992, J. Electron. Test..

[3]  Michael D. Ciletti,et al.  QUIETEST: a quiescent current testing methodology for detecting leakage faults , 1990, 1990 IEEE International Conference on Computer-Aided Design. Digest of Technical Papers.

[4]  M.E. Levitt ASIC testing upgraded , 1992, IEEE Spectrum.

[5]  Robert C. Aitken,et al.  THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TEST SETS ON QUALITY LEVEL PREDICTION: WHEN IS 80% BETTER THAN 90%? , 1991, 1991, Proceedings. International Test Conference.