Simultaneous versus sequential public good provision and the role of refunds -- An experimental study

We experimentally study contributing behavior to a threshold public good under simultaneous and sequential voluntary contribution mechanisms and investigate how refund policies interact with the mechanism. We find that, for a given refund rule, efficiency is greater under a sequential contribution mechanism than under a simultaneous contribution mechanism. Furthermore, for a given order of contributions, we find that full refund unambiguously achieves higher efficiency in the simultaneous mechanism while this is not the case in the sequential mechanism.

[1]  E. Fehr A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[2]  H. Varian,et al.  On the private provision of public goods , 1986 .

[3]  Rachel Croson,et al.  Alternative Rebate Rules in the Provision of a Threshold Public Good: An Experimental Investigation , 1998 .

[4]  V. Smith,et al.  Research in Experimental Economics , 1979 .

[5]  Nick Feltovich,et al.  Critical Values for the Robust Rank-Order Test , 2005 .

[6]  Rachel Croson,et al.  Step Returns in Threshold Public Goods: A Meta- and Experimental Analysis , 2000 .

[7]  David Schmidtz,et al.  The assurance problem in a laboratory market , 1989 .

[8]  Ido Erev,et al.  Provision of Step-Level Public Goods , 1990 .

[9]  J. Andreoni,et al.  Chapter 82 Partners versus Strangers: Random Rematching in Public Goods Experiments , 1998 .

[10]  James Andreoni,et al.  Why free ride?: Strategies and learning in public goods experiments , 1988 .

[11]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation , 1999 .

[12]  A. Roth,et al.  Learning in Extensive-Form Games: Experimental Data and Simple Dynamic Models in the Intermediate Term* , 1995 .

[13]  Lise Vesterlund,et al.  The informational value of sequential fundraising , 2003 .

[14]  Wulf Albers,et al.  Social dilemmas and cooperation , 1994 .

[15]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition , 2000 .

[16]  Anat R. Admati,et al.  Joint Projects without Commitment , 1991 .

[17]  H. Varian Sequential contributions to public goods , 1994 .

[18]  A. Rapoport,et al.  Provision of step-level public goods: Effects of different information structures , 1984 .

[19]  Michael McKee,et al.  Voluntary Contribution Games: Efficient Private Provision of Public Goods , 1991 .

[20]  William S. Neilson,et al.  Beliefs About Other-Regarding Preferences in a Sequential Public Goods Game , 2005 .

[21]  J. Ledyard Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research , 1994 .

[22]  Robert E. Dorsey,et al.  The voluntary contributions mechanism with real time revisions , 1992 .

[23]  Barton L. Lipman,et al.  Provision of Public Goods: Fully Implementing the Core through Private Contributions , 1989 .

[24]  J. Andreoni Toward a Theory of Charitable Fundraising , 1998 .

[25]  Douglas R. Glasnapp,et al.  Essentials of statistical analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1985 .

[26]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[27]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[28]  H. Varian Sequential Provision Of Public Goods , 1990 .