Technology choice and capacity expansion with two product families : tradeoffs between scale and scope

Recent developments in modern technologies such as CIM, FMS and CAD provide a great degree of operational flexibility and permit production of a variety of products with little or no changeover costs. In contrast, dedicated technologies with specialized equipment are designed to produce a limited range of products more efficiently. In this paper, we examire the tradeoffs between scale and scope economies in a two-product environment with general, dynamic demand patterns. We use a discrete period, finite horizon mathematical program to determine the optimal mix of dedicated and flexible technologies. Since the problem is difficult to solve optimally, we develop a two-phased heuristic procedure to obtain good expansion plans that determine type of technologies and amount of capacity additions. These procedures are based on easily solvable subproblems derived from the planning problem. Our computational results suggest that the methods work well and provide acceptable solutions with reasonable effort.

[1]  Hanan Luss,et al.  Multifacility-Type Capacity Expansion Planning: Algorithms and Complexities , 1987, Oper. Res..

[2]  Donald Erlenkotter,et al.  Note---A Dynamic Programming Approach to Capacity Expansion with Specialization , 1974 .

[3]  John Freidenfelds,et al.  Near-optimal solution of a two-type capacity expansion problem , 1981, Comput. Oper. Res..

[4]  R. Jaikumar.  Postindustrial manufacturing , 1986 .

[5]  Rolf A. Lundin,et al.  Planning Horizons for the Dynamic Lot Size Model: Zabel vs. Protective Procedures and Computational Results , 1975, Oper. Res..

[6]  A. S. Manne.  CAPACITY EXPANSION AND PROBABILISTIC GROWTH , 1961 .

[7]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  Optimal investment in product-flexible manufacturing capacity , 1990 .

[8]  Christopher S. Tang.  Capacity and flexibility planning of an economical manufacturing system , 1991, J. Intell. Manuf..

[9]  C. Fong,et al.  The multiregional dynamic capacity expansion problem: an improved heuristic , 1986 .

[10]  Lynn Wilson,et al.  Alternating Policies For Non-Rearrangeable Networks , 1976 .

[11]  Hanan Luss,et al.  A capacity-expansion model for two facility types , 1979 .

[12]  George K. Hutchinson,et al.  The economic value of flexible automation , 1982 .

[13]  M. R. Rao,et al.  Capacity Expansion with Two Producing Regions and Concave Costs , 1975 .

[14]  H. Luss.  A heuristic for capacity expansion planning with multiple facility types , 1986 .

[15]  A. Kalotay,et al.  Joint Capacity Expansion Without Rearrangement , 1975 .

[16]  Arnoldo C. Hax,et al.  Hierarchical integration of production planning and scheduling , 1973 .

[17]  Diwakar Gupta,et al.  The optimal mix of flexible and dedicated manufacturing capacities: Hedging against demand uncertainty , 1992 .

[18]  Hanan Luss,et al.  A network flow approach for capacity expansion problems with two facility types , 1980 .

[19]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  Investments for Capacity Expansion. Size, Location, and Time-Phasing. Edited by A.S. Manne. Studies in the Economic Development of India, n° 5. London, G. Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1967, 239 p., 45/-. , 1967, Recherches économiques de Louvain.

[20]  Donald Gerwin,et al.  Manufacturing flexibility in the CAM era , 1989 .

[21]  Hanan Luss.  A multifacility capacity expansion model with joint expansion set‐up costs , 1983 .

[22]  A. Kalotay.  Capacity Expansion and Specialization , 1973 .

[23]  Hanan Luss,et al.  Operations Research and Capacity Expansion Problems: A Survey , 1982, Oper. Res..