Significance of Karyopherin-α 2 (KPNA2) Expression in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background: Karyopherin-α 2 (KPNA2) is a member of the importin α family and has recently been reported to play an important role in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. The aim of the current study was to elucidate the clinicopathological significance of immuno- histochemical expression of KPNA2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients and Methods: KPNA2 expression was investigated by immunohistochemistry in 116 surgically resected ESCC, and the association of KPNA2 expression with clinicopathologic features was also examined. Results: Sixty (51.7%) ESCCs demonstrated positive expression of KPNA2. Positive expression of KPNA2 showed a significant association with poor differentiation (p=0.015), tumor depth (p=0.001), lymphatic invasion (p<0.001), venous invasion (p<0.001), and tumor stage (p=0.008). Positive expression of KPNA2 was also significantly associated with Ki-67 labeling index (p=0.039). Univariate analysis revealed that the prognosis of the ESCC patients whose tumors demonstrated positive expression of KPNA2 was significantly poorer than that of those that did not (p=0.009). Multivariate analysis revealed that only tumor depth and the presence of lymph node metastasis, which are strong prognostic factors in ESCC, were independently associated with poor prognosis in this study. Conclusion: KPNA2 expression is associated with poor differentiation, tumor invasiveness, and tumor proliferation in ESCC. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most difficult malignancies to cure. Its prognosis remains unsatisfactory despite significant advances in surgical techniques and perioperative management and the introduction of multimodality therapies (1).

[1]  T. Nakajima,et al.  CD24 Expression Is a Novel Prognostic Factor in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[2]  E. Dahl,et al.  Nuclear karyopherin α2 expression predicts poor survival in patients with advanced breast cancer irrespective of treatment intensity , 2008, International journal of cancer.

[3]  G. Kristiansen,et al.  KPNA2 protein expression in invasive breast carcinoma and matched peritumoral ductal carcinoma in situ , 2007, Virchows Archiv.

[4]  H. Kuwano,et al.  Surgical Treatment for Esophageal Cancer , 2007, Digestive Surgery.

[5]  S. Chiou,et al.  Overexpression of NBS1 induces epithelial–mesenchymal transition and co-expression of NBS1 and Snail predicts metastasis of head and neck cancer , 2007, Oncogene.

[6]  Arndt Hartmann,et al.  Protein Expression Profiling in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients Treated with High-Dose or Conventional Dose–Dense Chemotherapy , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  Christian Pilarsky,et al.  Molecular Profiling of Laser-Microdissected Matched Tumor and Normal Breast Tissue Identifies Karyopherin α2 as a Potential Novel Prognostic Marker in Breast Cancer , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  Kou-Juey Wu,et al.  Importin KPNA2, NBS1, DNA Repair and Tumorigenesis , 2006, Journal of Molecular Histology.

[9]  A. Eggermont,et al.  Gene expression profiling of primary cutaneous melanoma and clinical outcome. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  Kou-Juey Wu,et al.  Importin KPNA2 Is Required for Proper Nuclear Localization and Multiple Functions of NBS1* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  Kou-Juey Wu,et al.  Overexpression of NBS1 Contributes to Transformation through the Activation of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  H. Sakagami,et al.  Importin α transports CaMKIV to the nucleus without utilizing importin β , 2005 .

[13]  D. Jans,et al.  Regulation of Nuclear Transport: Central Role in Development and Transformation? , 2005, Traffic.

[14]  D. Delia,et al.  Karyopherin-α2 Protein Interacts with Chk2 and Contributes to Its Nuclear Import* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  Kou-Juey Wu,et al.  c-Myc Directly Regulates the Transcription of the NBS1 Gene Involved in DNA Double-strand Break Repair * , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  S. Jackson,et al.  The MRE11 complex: at the crossroads of DNA repair and checkpoint signalling , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[17]  I. Macara Transport into and out of the Nucleus , 2001, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[18]  G. Blobel,et al.  Karyopherins and nuclear import. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[19]  N. Mailand,et al.  The ATM–Chk2–Cdc25A checkpoint pathway guards against radioresistant DNA synthesis , 2001, Nature.

[20]  J. Petrini The Mre11 complex and ATM: collaborating to navigate S phase. , 2000, Current opinion in cell biology.

[21]  P. Karran,et al.  DNA double strand break repair in mammalian cells. , 2000, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[22]  S. Elledge,et al.  DNA damage-induced activation of p53 by the checkpoint kinase Chk2. , 2000, Science.

[23]  Y Taya,et al.  The human homologs of checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Cds1 (Chk2) phosphorylate p53 at multiple DNA damage-inducible sites. , 2000, Genes & development.

[24]  T. Halazonetis,et al.  Chk2/hCds1 functions as a DNA damage checkpoint in G(1) by stabilizing p53. , 2000, Genes & development.

[25]  W. Richards,et al.  Pathologic prognostic factors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a follow-up study of 74 patients with or without preoperative chemoradiation therapy. , 1999, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[26]  S. Carr,et al.  Mammalian Chk2 is a downstream effector of the ATM-dependent DNA damage checkpoint pathway , 1999, Oncogene.

[27]  K. Chow,et al.  Prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: analysis of clinicopathological and biological factors , 1999, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[28]  Ahmad Faried,et al.  Prognostic significance of EpCAM expression in human esophageal cancer. , 2007, International journal of oncology.

[29]  H. Sakagami,et al.  Importin alpha transports CaMKIV to the nucleus without utilizing importin beta. , 2005, EMBO Journal.

[30]  T. Halazonetis,et al.  Chk 2 / hCds 1 functions as a DNA damage checkpoint in G 1 by stabilizing p 53 , 2022 .