Effects of Directionality in Deductive Reasoning: II. Premise Integration and Conclusion Evaluation

Previous research (Oberauer & Wilhelm, 2000) has shown an inherent directionality between the two terms linked in premises of typical deductive reasoning tasks. With three experiments we investigated the effect of inherent directionality on the time to integrate two premises and for the derivation of a conclusion. We varied figure (i.e., order of terms in the premises) and direction of inference (i.e., order of terms in the conclusion) in deduction tasks from various domains (propositional reasoning, syllogisms, spatial, temporal, and linear order reasoning). Effects of figure on premise reading times varied with the directionality of the relations. Effects of direction of inference reflected the same directionality for a subset of relations. We propose that two factors are jointly responsible for a large part of observed directionality effects in premise integration: the inherent directionality of relational statements and a general advantage for a given–new order of terms in the second premise. Difficulty of deriving a conclusion is affected by the directionality or relations if and only if the relation is semantically asymmetric, so that the directionality must be preserved in the integrated mental model.

[1]  I. Hunter,et al.  The solving of three-term series problems. , 1957, British journal of psychology.

[2]  Elisabet Engdahl,et al.  Information Packaging in HPSG , 1996 .

[3]  G. Logan.  Linguistic and Conceptual Control of Visual Spatial Attention , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  O. Wilhelm,et al.  Effects of directionality in deductive reasoning: I. The comprehension of single relational premises. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Gino De Vooght,et al.  Spatial Mental Models in Linear Reasoning , 1998, Kognitionswissenschaft.

[6]  Pierre Barrouillet,et al.  Conditional reasoning by mental models: chronometric and developmental evidence , 2000, Cognition.

[7]  Allen Newell,et al.  Deduction as verbal reasoning. , 1995 .

[8]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Human Reasoning: The Psychology Of Deduction , 1993 .

[9]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[10]  K. Stenning,et al.  Image and Language in Human Reasoning: A Syllogistic Illustration , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  M. Beeman,et al.  Building and Accessing Clausal Representations: The Advantage of First Mention versus the Advantage of Clause Recency. , 1989, Journal of memory and language.

[12]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Adjectives, Comparatives, and Syllogisms. , 1971 .

[13]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental models and temporal reasoning , 1996, Cognition.

[14]  S. Handel,et al.  Social reasoning and spatial paralogic. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Alicia J. Knoedler,et al.  The shift from recency to primacy with increasing delay. , 1999 .

[16]  C. Santamaría,et al.  Activation of end-terms in syllogistic reasoning , 2000 .

[17]  L. Rips.  The Psychology of Proof , 1994 .

[18]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. , 1969 .

[19]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  The psychology of syllogisms , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  R. Freedle.  Discourse production and comprehension , 1978 .

[21]  G. Boolos.  On ‘syllogistic inference’ , 1984, Cognition.

[22]  Rocky Ross,et al.  Mental models , 2004, SIGA.

[23]  N. Chater,et al.  The Probability Heuristics Model of Syllogistic Reasoning , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  Jonathan St. B. T. Evans,et al.  The mental model theory of conditional reasoning: critical appraisal and revision , 1993, Cognition.

[25]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Picturing repeated measures: Comments on Loftus, Morrison, and others , 1996 .

[26]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Two principles of premise integration in spatial reasoning , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Stephen J. Payne,et al.  Given-New Versus New-Given?: An analysis of reading times for spatial descriptions , 2000 .

[28]  N. Chater,et al.  The probabilistic approach to human reasoning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Janellen Huttenlocher,et al.  Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning. , 1968 .

[30]  Elizabeth B. Isaacs,et al.  Differential course of development of spatial and verbal memory span: A normative study , 1989 .

[31]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Development of syllogistic reasoning. , 1995, The American journal of psychology.

[32]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  How Diagrams Can Improve Reasoning , 1993 .