Using ROC curves to assess the efficacy of several detectors of damage-induced nonlinearities in a bolted composite structure

Abstract We offer a comparison of several different detectors of damage-induced nonlinearities in assessing the connectivity of a composite-to-metal bolted joint. Each detector compares the structure's measured vibrational response to surrogate data, conforming to a general model for the healthy structure. The strength of this approach to detection is that it works in the presence of certain types of varying ambient conditions and is valid for structures excited with any stationary process. Here we employ several such detectors using dynamic strain response data collected near the joint as the structure was driven using simulated wave forcing (taken from the Pierson–Moskowitz frequency distribution for wave height). In an effort to simulate in situ monitoring conditions the experiments were carried out in the presence of strongly varying temperatures. The performance of the detectors was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, a well known method for displaying detection characteristics. The ROC curve is well suited to the problem of vibration-based structural health monitoring applications where quantifying false positive and false negative errors is essential. The results of this work indicate that using the estimated auto-bicoherence of the systems response produced the best overall detection performance when compared to features based on a nonlinear prediction scheme and another based on information theory. For roughly 10% false alarms, the bicoherence detector gives nearly 90% probability of detection (POD). Conversely, for several of the other detectors 5–10% false alarms leads to ∼ 70 % POD. While the bicoherence (and bispectrum) have been used previously in the context of damage detection, this work represents the first attempt at using them in a surrogate-based detection scheme.

[1]  Paul R. White,et al.  HIGHER-ORDER TIME-FREQUENCY ANALYSIS AND ITS APPLICATION TO FAULT DETECTION IN ROTATING MACHINERY , 1997 .

[2]  Weidong Zhu,et al.  On an iterative general-order perturbation method for multiple structural damage detection , 2004 .

[3]  Robert N. McDonough,et al.  Detection of signals in noise , 1971 .

[4]  Haym Benaroya,et al.  Nonlinear and Stochastic Dynamics of Compliant Offshore Structures , 2002 .

[5]  E. Parloo,et al.  DAMAGE ASSESSMENT USING MODE SHAPE SENSITIVITIES , 2003 .

[6]  Louis M Pecora,et al.  A unified approach to attractor reconstruction. , 2007, Chaos.

[7]  M.R. Raghuveer,et al.  Bispectrum estimation: A digital signal processing framework , 1987, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Statistical Damage Classification Under Changing Environmental and Operational Conditions , 2002 .

[9]  Paul R. White,et al.  BISPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF THE BILINEAR OSCILLATOR WITH APPLICATION TO THE DETECTION OF FATIGUE CRACKS , 1998 .

[10]  J. A. Swets,et al.  Assessment of NDT systems. I. The relationship of true and falx detections. II. Indices of performance , 1983 .

[11]  A. Neiman,et al.  Surrogate analysis of coherent multichannel data. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  Mario Ragwitz,et al.  Markov models from data by simple nonlinear time series predictors in delay embedding spaces. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Jonathan M. Nichols,et al.  A method for detecting damage-induced nonlinearities in structures using information theory , 2006 .

[14]  T. Schreiber,et al.  Surrogate time series , 1999, chao-dyn/9909037.

[15]  William Q. Meeker,et al.  Applications of statistical methods to nondestructive evaluation , 1996 .

[16]  J. Chen,et al.  Damage Identification of Nonlinear Structural Systems , 2000 .

[17]  K. Dolan,et al.  Surrogate for nonlinear time series analysis. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Thomas Schreiber,et al.  Constrained Randomization of Time Series Data , 1998, chao-dyn/9909042.

[19]  Michael D. Todd,et al.  A novel Bragg grating sensor interrogation system utilizing a scanning filter, a Mach-Zehnder interferometer and a 3×3 coupler , 2001 .

[20]  T. Schreiber,et al.  Discrimination power of measures for nonlinearity in a time series , 1997, chao-dyn/9909043.

[21]  P. D. McFadden,et al.  Nonlinear Vibration Characteristics of Damaged Concrete Beams , 2003 .

[22]  C. Nockemann,et al.  Reliability in NDT: ROC study of radiographic weld inspections , 1991 .

[23]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Reference-Free NDT Technique for Debonding Detection in CFRP-Strengthened RC Structures , 2007 .

[24]  Douglas E. Adams FREQUENCY DOMAIN ARX MODEL AND MULTI-HARMONIC FRF ESTIMATORS FOR NON-LINEAR DYNAMIC SYSTEMS , 2002 .

[25]  Kugiumtzis Surrogate data test for nonlinearity including nonmonotonic transforms , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[26]  E. Parloo,et al.  AUTONOMOUS STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING—PART I: MODAL PARAMETER ESTIMATION AND TRACKING , 2002 .

[27]  M. Feldman,et al.  Damage Diagnosis of Rotors: Application of Hilbert Transform and Multihypothesis Testing , 1999 .

[28]  James Theiler,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data , 1992 .

[29]  Schreiber,et al.  Improved Surrogate Data for Nonlinearity Tests. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[30]  Nuno M. M. Maia,et al.  Damage detection in structures: From mode shape to frequency response function methods , 2003 .

[31]  A. G. Barnett,et al.  A time-domain test for some types of nonlinearity , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[32]  Arun Kumar Pandey,et al.  Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes , 1991 .

[33]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  A review of structural health monitoring literature 1996-2001 , 2002 .

[34]  Claus-Peter Fritzen,et al.  Model Based Damage Identification Using Output Spectral Densities , 2001 .

[35]  D. Kugiumtzis,et al.  Test your surrogate data before you test for nonlinearity. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[36]  Weizhong Yan,et al.  Defect classification of highly noisy NDE data using classifier ensembles , 2006, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[37]  Bogdan I. Epureanu,et al.  Damage detection in nonlinear systems using system augmentation and generalized minimum rank perturbation theory , 2005 .

[38]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  An experimental study of temperature effect on modal parameters of the Alamosa Canyon Bridge , 1999 .