A three‐dimensional fuzzy methodology for flood risk analysis

This paper presents a methodology for assessing spatial and temporal uncertainty associated with flood risk management. Traditional modelling approaches focus on either temporal or spatial variability, but not both. There is a need to understand the dynamic characteristics of flood risk and its spatial variability. The traditional two-dimensional (2D) fuzzy set, with one dimension for the universe of discourse and the other dimension for its membership degree, is not sufficient to handle both, spatial and temporal variation of flood risk. The theoretical foundation of this study is based on the development of a three-dimensional (3D) fuzzy set that includes flood risk variability in space and time. The proposed methodology extends the acceptance level of partial flood damage concept to a 3D representation and allows capturing change of decision makers' preferences in time and space. The main objective of the paper is to present an original methodology for flood risk management that is capable of (a) addressing uncertainty caused by spatial and temporal variability and ambiguity; (b) integrating objective and subjective risks; and (c) assisting flood management decision making based on a more detailed understanding of temporal and spatial variability of risk. Presented methodology is illustrated using the Red River flood of 1997 (Manitoba, Canada) as a case study.

[1]  Slobodan P. Simonovic,et al.  Comparison of fuzzy set ranking methods for implementation in water resources decision-making , 2002 .

[2]  Jim W. Hall,et al.  Advances in flood risk management under uncertainty , 2005 .

[3]  Shaoyuan Li,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Fuzzy Control Methodology for a Class of Distributed Parameter Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[4]  Guy De Tré,et al.  Field Based Methods for the Modeling of Fuzzy Spatial Data , 2005 .

[5]  J. Ganoulis Engineering risk analysis of water pollution , 1994 .

[6]  Slobodan P. Simonovic,et al.  A fuzzy compromise approach to water resource systems planning under uncertainty , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[7]  Taslima Akter,et al.  Aggregation of fuzzy views of a large number of stakeholders for multi-objective flood management decision-making. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  A-Xing Zhu,et al.  Fuzzy Representation of Special Terrain Features Using a Similarity-based Approach , 2005 .

[9]  Slobodan P. Simonovic Social criteria for evaluation of flood control measures: Winnipeg case study , 1999 .

[10]  Bryan W. Karney,et al.  Fluid transients and pipeline optimization using GA and PSO: the diameter connection , 2004 .

[11]  Hans W. Guesgen,et al.  Fuzzy Reasoning about Geographic Regions , 2005 .

[12]  Dinesh Verma,et al.  A fuzzy weighted wedge mechanism for feasibility assessment of system reliability during conceptual design , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[13]  Slobodan P. Simonovic,et al.  A spatial multi-objective decision-making under uncertainty for water resources management , 2005 .

[14]  Slobodan P. Simonovic,et al.  Aggregation operators for soft decision making in water resources , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[15]  Slobodan P. Simonovic,et al.  Fuzzy criteria for the evaluation of water resource systems performance , 2004 .

[16]  Slobodan P. Simonovic,et al.  A methodology for spatial fuzzy reliability analysis , 2007 .

[17]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Stakeholder Values and Scientific Modeling in the Neuse River Watershed , 2001 .

[18]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  Group decision making under fuzziness , 1999 .