Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis.

Summary knowledge of results (KR) involves the presentation KR for each of a set of trials (e.g., 10) only after the last trial in the set has been completed. Earlier, Lavery (1962) showed that, relative to providing KR after each trial, a 20-trial summary KR was detrimental to performance in a practice phase with KR present but was beneficial for a no-KR retention test. Using a relatively simple ballistic-timing task, we examined summary lengths of 1 (essentially KR after every trial), 5, 10, and 15 trials, searching for an inverted-U relationship between summary length and retention performance as predicated by a guidance hypothesis for KR. During acquisition when KR was present and being manipulated, all groups showed improvements in performance across practice, while increased summary lengths generally depressed performance. However, in a delayed no-KR retention test, there was an inverse relation between the summary length in acquisition and absolute constant error on the retention test. A guidance hypothesis is favored to explain how, relative to immediate KR, long KR summaries can provide detrimental effects in acquisition while enhancing retention performance.

[1]  G. F. Arps.  Work with knowledge of results versus work without knowledge of results: Awareness and partial awareness as factors conditioning efficiency. , 1920 .

[2]  S. L. Crawley.  An experimental investigation of recovery from work , 1926 .

[3]  E. Thorndike.  The law of effect. , 1927 .

[4]  M. Mayer.  Foundations of experimental psychology , 1930 .

[5]  M. H. Trowbridge,et al.  An Experimental Study of Thorndike's Theory of Learning , 1932 .

[6]  F. W. Irwin.  Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men , 1932, The Psychological Clinic.

[7]  Edward L. Thorndike,et al.  The influence of delay in the aftereffect of a connection , 1935 .

[8]  G. C. Grindley,et al.  The Effect of Knowledge of Results on Learning and Performance: III. The Influence of the Time Interval between Trials , 1949, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  I. Bilodeau,et al.  Accuracy of a simple positioning response with variation in the number of trials by which knowledge of results is delayed. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[10]  E A BILODEAU,et al.  Some effects of introducing and withdrawing knowledge of results early and late in practice. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  J. J. Lavery.  Retention of simple motor skills as a function of type of knowledge of results. , 1962 .

[12]  J J LAVERY,et al.  Retention of Simple Motor Skills as a Function of the Number of Trials by Which KR is Delayed , 1962, Perceptual and motor skills.

[13]  J. J. Lavery.  THE EFFECT OF ONE-TRIAL DELAY IN KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS ON THE ACQUISITION AND RETENTION OF A TOSSING SKILL. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  D. H. Holding,et al.  Principles of Training , 1965 .

[15]  J. Adams,et al.  A closed-loop theory of motor learning. , 1971, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Evidence for an error detection mechanism in motor skills. , 1972, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[18]  R. Schmidt.  A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[19]  K. Newell.  Knowledge Of Results And Motor Learning , 1976, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[20]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[21]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  The 1984 C. H. McCloy Research Lecture: The Search for Invariance in Skilled Movement Behavior , 1985 .

[23]  J. Adams.  Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. , 1987 .

[24]  D E Sherwood,et al.  Effect of Bandwidth Knowledge of Results on Movement Consistency , 1988, Perceptual and motor skills.