Dynamics of large proteins through hierarchical levels of coarse‐grained structures

Elastic network models have been successful in elucidating the largest scale collective motions of proteins. These models are based on a set of highly coupled springs, where only the close neighboring amino acids interact, without any residue specificity. Our objective here is to determine whether the equivalent cooperative motions can be obtained upon further coarse‐graining of the protein structure along the backbone. The influenza virus hemagglutinin A (HA), composed of N=1509 residues, is utilized for this analysis. Elastic network model calculations are performed for coarse‐grained HA structures containing only N/2, N/10, N/20, and N/40 residues along the backbone. High correlations (>0.95) between residue fluctuations are obtained for the first dominant (slowest) mode of motion between the original model and the coarse‐grained models. In the case of coarse‐graining by a factor of 1/40, the slowest mode shape for HA is reconstructed for all residues by successively selecting different subsets of residues, shifting one residue at a time. The correlation for this reconstructed first mode shape with the original all‐residue case is 0.73, while the computational time is reduced by about three orders of magnitude. The reduction in computational time will be much more significant for larger targeted structures. Thus, the dominant motions of protein structures are robust enough to be captured at extremely high levels of coarse‐graining. And more importantly, the dynamics of extremely large complexes are now accessible with this new methodology. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 23: 119–127, 2002

[1]  I. Wilson,et al.  Structure of the haemagglutinin membrane glycoprotein of influenza virus at 3 Å resolution , 1981, Nature.

[2]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. , 1997, Folding & design.

[3]  R L Jernigan,et al.  Vibrational dynamics of transfer RNAs: comparison of the free and synthetase-bound forms. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Vibrational Dynamics of Folded Proteins: Significance of Slow and Fast Motions in Relation to Function and Stability , 1998 .

[5]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Proteins with similar architecture exhibit similar large-scale dynamic behavior. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[6]  G. Zaccai,et al.  How soft is a protein? A protein dynamics force constant measured by neutron scattering. , 2000, Science.

[7]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Dynamics of proteins predicted by molecular dynamics simulations and analytical approaches: Application to α‐amylase inhibitor , 2000, Proteins.

[8]  W. Chiu,et al.  Structural biology of viruses , 1997 .

[9]  I. Bahar,et al.  Structure‐based analysis of protein dynamics: Comparison of theoretical results for hen lysozyme with X‐ray diffraction and NMR relaxation data , 1999, Proteins.

[10]  J. Bentz,et al.  Minimal aggregate size and minimal fusion unit for the first fusion pore of influenza hemagglutinin-mediated membrane fusion. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[11]  M Nilges,et al.  Efficient sampling in collective coordinate space , 2000, Proteins.

[12]  Tirion,et al.  Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[13]  I. Bahar,et al.  Gaussian Dynamics of Folded Proteins , 1997 .

[14]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Identification of kinetically hot residues in proteins , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[15]  Robert L. Jernigan,et al.  Relating structure to function through the dominant slow modes of motion of DNA topoisomerase II , 1999 .

[16]  J. Skehel,et al.  Refinement of the influenza virus hemagglutinin by simulated annealing. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  K. Hinsen,et al.  Analysis of domain motions in large proteins , 1999, Proteins.

[18]  R L Jernigan,et al.  Cooperative fluctuations and subunit communication in tryptophan synthase. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[19]  N. Go,et al.  Investigating protein dynamics in collective coordinate space. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[20]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[21]  R L Jernigan,et al.  Collective motions in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase: examination of flexibility and enzyme function. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[23]  K. Hinsen,et al.  A simplified force field for describing vibrational protein dynamics over the whole frequency range , 1999 .

[24]  K. Hinsen Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations , 1998, Proteins.

[25]  Y. Sanejouand,et al.  Building‐block approach for determining low‐frequency normal modes of macromolecules , 2000, Proteins.

[26]  D. Covell,et al.  Correlation between native-state hydrogen exchange and cooperative residue fluctuations from a simple model. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[27]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.