Protein interaction networks of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster: Large‐scale organization and robustness

High‐throughput screens have begun to reveal protein interaction networks in several organisms. To understand the general properties of these protein interaction networks, a systematic analysis of topological structure and robustness was performed on the protein interaction networks of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster. It shows that the three protein interaction networks have a scale‐free and high‐degree clustering nature as the consequence of their hierarchical organization. It also shows that they have the small‐world property with similar diameter at 4–5. Evaluation of the consequences of random removal of both proteins and interactions from the protein interaction networks suggests their high degree of robustness. Simulation of a protein's removal shows that the protein interaction network's error tolerance is accompanied by attack vulnerability. These fundamental analyses of the networks might serve as a starting point for further exploring complex biological networks and the coming research of “systems biology”.

[1]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Functional and topological characterization of protein interaction networks , 2004, Proteomics.

[2]  Gary D Bader,et al.  A Combined Experimental and Computational Strategy to Define Protein Interaction Networks for Peptide Recognition Modules , 2001, Science.

[3]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[4]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[5]  Ronald L. Rivest,et al.  Introduction to Algorithms , 1990 .

[6]  S. Wuchty Scale-free behavior in protein domain networks. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[7]  B. Snel,et al.  Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions , 2002, Nature.

[8]  S. L. Wong,et al.  A Map of the Interactome Network of the Metazoan C. elegans , 2004, Science.

[9]  R. Albert,et al.  The large-scale organization of metabolic networks , 2000, Nature.

[10]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Modularity in Metabolic Networks , 2002, Science.

[11]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  On power-law relationships of the Internet topology , 1999, SIGCOMM '99.

[12]  M. Vidal,et al.  Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or "interologs". , 2001, Genome research.

[13]  T. Ito,et al.  Toward a protein-protein interaction map of the budding yeast: A comprehensive system to examine two-hybrid interactions in all possible combinations between the yeast proteins. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Degree sequences of random graphs , 1981, Discret. Math..

[15]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of networks , 2001, cond-mat/0106144.

[16]  Andrei Z. Broder,et al.  Graph structure in the Web , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[17]  S. Fields,et al.  A protein interaction map for cell polarity development , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  Gary D Bader,et al.  BIND--The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  David A. Gough,et al.  Predicting protein-protein interactions from primary structure , 2001, Bioinform..

[20]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[21]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[22]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[23]  Gabriele Ausiello,et al.  MINT: the Molecular INTeraction database , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  Martin Vingron,et al.  IntAct: an open source molecular interaction database , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  James R. Knight,et al.  A Protein Interaction Map of Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Science.