Fetal growth of beef calves. I. Effect of prepartum dietary crude protein on birth weight, blood metabolites and steroid hormone concentrations.

Fifty-nine crossbred heifers (427 kg) bred to one Hereford sire were randomly assigned at 75 d prepartum to two diets. Heifers were individually fed, and diets were isocaloric but contained either a low (LP = 81% NRC, .56 kg/d) or high (HP = 141% NRC, .98 kg/d) level of crude protein. Jugular vein cannulae were inserted into 16 LP and 16 HP heifers at 10 prepartum. Daily preprandial blood samples that were collected until parturition were analyzed for serum estradiol-17 beta (E2), progesterone (P4), glucose (G) and urea nitrogen (UN). Heifers fed LP gained slower than HP-fed heifers before calving (.73 vs 1.02 kg/d; P less than .01); immediate post-calving weights and condition scores were 418 vs 444 kg (P less than .01) and 5.4 vs 6.1 (P less than .01; LP vs HP, respectively). Calf birth weights (35.3 vs 36.1 kg), average calving difficulty score (1.6 vs 1.6) and percent assisted births (35.5 vs 35.7%) did not differ (P greater than .10; LP vs HP, respectively). Prepartum concentrations of UN (6.2 vs 13.5 mg/dl) and G (52.9 vs 58.2 mg/dl) were lower (P less than .05) and P4 (5.94 vs 4.26 ng/ml) was higher (P approximately equal to .07) in LP heifers. Prepartum concentration profiles were related to calving difficulty score (CD, 1 = no assistance to 3 = hard pull) for E2 (CD1 vs CD2 + CD3, P less than .01; CD2 vs CD3, P approximately equal to .01), P4 (CD1 vs CD2 + CD3, P less than .05), G (CD1 vs CD2 + CD3, P less than .05) and UN (CD2 vs CD3, P less than .05). After calving, all dams were maintained together on pasture and supplemented with alfalfa hay and grain mix until adequate range forage was available to maintain weight gains. Dams that were fed LP prepartum gained faster than HP dams during this period (.49 vs .15 kg/d; P less than .01). Prebreeding weights (443 vs 453 kg; LP vs HP) and condition scores (5.1 vs 5.1) did not differ, nor was the postpartum interval affected (44 vs 40 d; LP vs HP). There was no effect of dietary protein on dystocia or postpartum interval, although there were diet-induced differences in body weight and condition of the dams at calving. Results indicate that differences in prepartum profiles of serum steroid hormones and metabolites may be related to dystocia, in addition to relative fetal oversize.

[1]  R. E. Riley,et al.  Influence of prepartum dietary crude protein on growth hormone, insulin, reproduction, and lactation of dairy cows. , 1984, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  C. Ferrell,et al.  Blood flow, steroid secretion and nutrient uptake of the gravid bovine uterus and fetus. , 1983, Journal of animal science.

[3]  R. Short,et al.  Effects of Sire, Age of Dam and Gestation Feed Level on Dystocia and Postpartum Reproduction1 , 1982 .

[4]  R. Short,et al.  Multiple linear and nonlinear regression analyses of factors causing calving difficulty. , 1979, Theriogenology.

[5]  D. B. Laster,et al.  Development of the bovine fetus. , 1979, Journal of animal science.

[6]  D. B. Laster,et al.  Maternal energy status and development of liver and muscle in the bovine fetus. , 1979, Journal of animal science.

[7]  R. Short,et al.  Effect of nutrition on response to exogenous FSH in beef cattle. , 1979, Journal of animal science.

[8]  R. Short,et al.  Effects of Precalving Feed Level on Birth Weight, Calving Difficulty and Subsequent Fertility , 1978 .

[9]  F. M. Rouquette,et al.  Effects on dietary monensin and sex of calf on profiles of serum progesterone and estrogen in late pregnancy of first-cross Brahman-Hereford cows. , 1978, Journal of animal science.

[10]  G. H. Stott,et al.  Prepartum serum hormone concentrations related to dystocia in Holstein heifers. , 1977, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  K. Collis,et al.  The influence of dietary protein intake on milk production and blood composition of high-yielding dairy cows , 1976, Journal of Dairy Research.

[12]  L. Corah,et al.  Influence of prepartum nutrition on the reproductive performance of beef females and the performance of their progeny. , 1975, Journal of animal science.

[13]  L. Corah,et al.  Prepartum and postpartum levels of progesterone and estradiol in beef heifers fed two levels of energy. , 1974, Journal of animal science.

[14]  D. B. Laster.  Factors affecting pelvic size and dystocia in beef cattle. , 1974, Journal of animal science.

[15]  A. R. Midgley,et al.  Radioimmunoassay of Estradiol-17β Without Chromatography , 1974 .

[16]  D. B. Laster,et al.  Factors affecting dystocia and the effects of dystocia on subsequent reproduction in beef cattle. , 1973, Journal of animal science.

[17]  Rice Le,et al.  Factors affecting dystocia in beef heifers. , 1972 .

[18]  E. Makowski,et al.  Production and excretion of urea by the fetal lamb. , 1972, Pediatrics.

[19]  R. Short,et al.  Precalving body size and pelvic area relationships in Hereford heifers. , 1971, Journal of animal science.

[20]  O. F. Pahnish,et al.  Cause and effect relationships associated with calving difficulty and calf birth weight. , 1971, Journal of Animal Science.

[21]  G. Thorburn,et al.  Peripheral plasma progesterone concentration of cows during puberty, oestrous cycles, pregnancy and lactation, and the effects of under-nutrition or exogenous oxytocin on progesterone concentration. , 1970, The Journal of endocrinology.

[22]  T. Dunn,et al.  Reproductive performance of 2-year-old Hereford and Angus heifers as influenced by pre- and post-calving energy intake. , 1969, Journal of animal science.