Mathematical Modeling, Control, Computer Simulation and Laboratory Experiments of a Spatial Servopneumatic Parallel Robot

In this paper, the special construction of a parallel robot, called spatial servopneumatic multi-axis test facility, will be discussed. The investigations include the following aspects: (i) the laboratory set-up of the robot, (ii) various results obtained in laboratory experiments, taking into account quite different control algorithms and command-input signals, (iii) a comparison of the laboratory experiments with the computer simulations of Part I of this paper, and ({vi}) a quality check of the results compared with the cost of the different controller realizations. The results of both the computer simulations and the laboratory experiments show: (i) The dynamic behavior of the parallel structure can be tremendously improved by using sophisticated nonlinear control algorithms. (ii) This improvement has to be paid by a drastically increased amount of work for deriving the model equations and control algorithms, and by augmented hardware cost of the sensing elements and controller electronics. (iii) Carefully developed model equations and identified model parameters provide theoretical models of the complex parallel structure that are very close to reality. This enables the design engineer to systematically investigate constructive alternatives of the design parameters, sensor and actuator concepts, and control strategies of the MAP prior to their hardware realization.

[1]  H. Hahn,et al.  Nonlinear control and sensitivity analysis of a spatial multi-axis servo-hydraulic test facility , 1993, Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  A. Isidori Nonlinear Control Systems , 1985 .

[3]  H. Hahn Nichtlineare Regelung eines servopneumatischen Antriebs (Nonlinear Control of a Servopneumatic Actuator) , 2000 .

[4]  H. Hahn,et al.  NONLINEAR CONTROL OF PLANAR PARALLEL ROBOTS WITH REDUNDANT SERVOPNEUMATIC ACTUATORS , 1999 .

[5]  William Leithead,et al.  Survey of gain-scheduling analysis and design , 2000 .

[6]  H. Hahn Rigid body dynamics of mechanisms , 2002 .

[7]  B. Andersen,et al.  The Analysis and Design of Pneumatic Systems , 1976 .

[8]  F. Hecker,et al.  Mathematical Modeling and Parameter Identification of a Planar Servo-Pneumatic Test Facility. Part I: Mathematical Modeling and Computer Simulation , 1997 .

[9]  Jean-Pierre Merlet Closed-form resolution of the direct kinematics of parallel manipulators using extra sensors data , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  M. Raghavan The Stewart platform of general geometry has 40 configurations , 1993 .

[11]  F. Hecker,et al.  Mathematical Modeling and Parameter Identification of a Planar Servo-Pneumatic Test Facility. Part II: Experimental Identification , 1997 .

[12]  D. McCloy control of fluid power , 1973 .

[13]  Weiping Li,et al.  Applied Nonlinear Control , 1991 .

[14]  H. Hahn,et al.  Multi-axis vibration tests on spacecraft using hydraulic exciters , 1986 .

[15]  H. Hahn,et al.  Mathematical Modeling, Control, Computer Simulation and Laboratory Experiments of a Spatial Servopneumatic Parallel Robot , 2005 .

[16]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  A New Approach for the Dynamic Analysis of Parallel Manipulators , 1998 .

[17]  Bernhard Roth,et al.  A closed-form solution of the forward displacement analysis of a class of in-parallel mechanisms , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[18]  Alain Codourey,et al.  Dynamic Modeling of Parallel Robots for Computed-Torque Control Implementation , 1998, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[19]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Dynamic analysis and control of a stewart platform manipulator , 1993, J. Field Robotics.

[20]  Zhiming Ji Study of the effect of leg inertia in Stewart platforms , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[21]  D. Stewart A Platform with Six Degrees of Freedom , 1965 .