Inferring Information Propagation over Online Social Networks: Edge Asymmetry and Flow Tendency

Inferring the underlying information propagation over online social networks is important because it leads to new insights and enables forecasting, as well as influencing information propagation. In this paper, we analyze propagation processes in online social networks, when only limited details of propagation are available. We use data crawled from Chinese largest recommendation social network -- Douban Network, and study how the information propagates through the user relationship network of Douban. By using the users' follow relationship information, and time sequence of registering for participation in events, we build the potential propagation paths of events. After analyzing the propagation processes of 30,778 events in which about 1.47 million users are involved, we observe the statistical characteristics of propagation paths of those events, including the different types of participants and size distribution of connected participants. Further, we find that information propagation between node pairs are asymmetric. Moreover, based on the asymmetric property between node pairs, we propose a concept -- Information Potential Energy, that describes the capability that nodes disseminate information over a network. Finally, we propose a Flow Shell (FS) model that can efficiently and correctly calculate the nodes' Information Potential Energy, and validate it.

[1]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[2]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Modeling Information Diffusion in Implicit Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[3]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Rise and fall patterns of information diffusion: model and implications , 2012, KDD.

[4]  Shaojie Tang,et al.  Relationship classification in large scale online social networks and its impact on information propagation , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[5]  Christian Decker,et al.  Information propagation in the Bitcoin network , 2013, IEEE P2P 2013 Proceedings.

[6]  M. Macy,et al.  Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Influence and correlation in social networks , 2008, KDD.

[8]  Duncan J Watts,et al.  A simple model of global cascades on random networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Robert J. Moore,et al.  The life and death of online gaming communities: a look at guilds in world of warcraft , 2007, CHI.

[10]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Tracing information flow on a global scale using Internet chain-letter data , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[12]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The role of social networks in information diffusion , 2012, WWW.

[13]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter , 2011, WSDM '11.

[14]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Cascading Behavior in Large Blog Graphs , 2007 .

[15]  Srinivasan Parthasarathy,et al.  An event-based framework for characterizing the evolutionary behavior of interaction graphs , 2007, KDD '07.

[16]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on twitter , 2011, WWW.

[17]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Information Contagion: An Empirical Study of the Spread of News on Digg and Twitter Social Networks , 2010, ICWSM.

[18]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[20]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.