Inversion of inline and broadside marine controlled‐source electromagnetic data with constraints derived from seismic data

We present a structural smoothing regularization scheme in the context of inversion of marine controlled-source electromagnetic data. The regularizing hypothesis is that the electrical parameters have a structure similar to that of the elastic parameters observed from seismic data. The regularization is split into three steps. First, we ensure that our inversion grid conforms with the geometry derived from seismic. Second, we use a seismic stratigraphic attribute to define a spatially varying regularization strength. Third, we use an indexing strategy on the inversion grid to define smoothing along the seismic geometry. Enforcing such regularization in the inversion will encourage an inversion result that is more intuitive for the interpreter to deal with. However, the interpreter should also be aware of the bias introduced by using seismic data for regularization. We illustrate the method using one synthetic example and one field data example. The results show how the regularization works and that it clearly enforces the structure derived from seismic data. From the field data example we find that the inversion result improves when the structural smoothing regularization is employed. Including the broadside data improves the inversion results even more, due to a better balancing between the sensitivities for the horizontal and vertical resistivities.

[1]  Kerry Key,et al.  Seismically regularized controlled-source electromagnetic inversion , 2012 .

[2]  R. Mittet,et al.  Incorporating Seismic Horizons In Inversion of CSEM Data , 2009 .

[3]  Lucy MacGregor,et al.  Sea Bed Logging (SBL), a new method for remote and direct identification of hydrocarbon filled layers in deepwater areas , 2002 .

[4]  Detecting Skrugard by CSEM — Prewell prediction and postwell evaluation , 2014 .

[5]  R. Mittet,et al.  Decomposition in upgoing and downgoing fields and inversion of marine CSEM data , 2013 .

[6]  B. Ursin,et al.  TIV Contrast Source Inversion of mCSEM data , 2011 .

[7]  G. A. Newman,et al.  Imaging CSEM data in the presence of electrical anisotropy - eScholarship , 2010 .

[8]  M. Zhdanov,et al.  Regularized Focusing Inversion of Marine CSEM Data Using Minimum Vertical Support Stabilizer , 2007 .

[9]  L. Masnaghetti,et al.  Analysis of the Sensitivity to Anisotropy of CSEM Data Using 2.5D Modeling And Inversion , 2010 .

[10]  Aria Abubakar,et al.  2.5D forward and inverse modeling for interpreting low-frequency electromagnetic measurements , 2008 .

[11]  Jan Fetter Morten,et al.  CSEM Data Uncertainty Analysis For 3D Inversion , 2009 .

[12]  William Rodi,et al.  Joint 3D Inversion of Marine CSEM And MT Data , 2007 .

[13]  A. Lovatini,et al.  Seismic Geobody-driven 3D Controlled-source Electromagnetic Modeling , 2012 .

[14]  M. Zhdanov,et al.  Rigorous 3D inversion of marine CSEM data based on the integral equation method , 2007 .

[16]  Michael Commer,et al.  Three-dimensional controlled-source electromagnetic and magnetotelluric joint inversion , 2009 .

[17]  René-Édouard Plessix,et al.  Resistivity imaging with controlled-source electromagnetic data: depth and data weighting , 2008 .

[18]  Frank A. Maaø,et al.  Fast finite-difference time-domain modeling for marine-subsurface electromagnetic problems , 2007 .