Effects of cardiac rehabilitation referral strategies on referral and enrollment rates

Despite recommendations in clinical practice guidelines, evidence suggests that utilization of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) following indicated cardiac events is low. Referral strategies, such as automatic referral, have been advocated to improve CR utilization. In this Review, we evaluate the effects of referral strategies on rates of CR referral and enrollment. Referral strategies are categorized as 'automatic' (the use of electronic health records or systematic discharge order sets), as 'liaison' (discussions with allied health-care providers), or as 'other' (for example, the use of motivational letter to patients). The highest rates of CR referral have been achieved in studies implementing automatic referral orders, whereas the highest rates of CR enrollment have resulted from a combination of automatic and liaison methods. Overall, innovative referral strategies significantly increase CR utilization. While further investigation is needed, institutions should evaluate their CR referral practice in light of these findings.

[1]  Sidney C. Smith,et al.  Improved treatment of hospitalized coronary artery disease patients with the get with the guidelines program. , 2007, Critical pathways in cardiology.

[2]  G. Feder,et al.  Secondary prevention for patients after a myocardial infarction: summary of NICE guidance , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  H. Arthur,et al.  Predicting cardiac rehabilitation enrollment: the role of automatic physician referral , 2006, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[4]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study , 2004, The Lancet.

[5]  M. Cabana,et al.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. , 1999, JAMA.

[6]  D. Stewart,et al.  Automatic Referral to Cardiac Rehabilitation , 2004, Medical care.

[7]  I. Harris,et al.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2010 .

[8]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Version 2012) , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[9]  M. J. Ashby,et al.  The Spironolactone, Amiloride, Losartan, and Thiazide (SALT) Double-Blind Crossover Trial in Patients With Low-Renin Hypertension and Elevated Aldosterone-Renin Ratio , 2007, Circulation.

[10]  R. Gliklich,et al.  Get with the guidelines for cardiovascular secondary prevention: pilot results. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[11]  Leslie Neal-Boylan,et al.  Overcoming Barriers. , 2015, Journal for nurses in professional development.

[12]  A. Fraser,et al.  Gender differences in management after acute myocardial infarction: not 'sexism' but a reflection of age at presentation. , 2004, Journal of public health.

[13]  G. Lip,et al.  The Birmingham rehabilitation uptake maximisation study (BRUM): a randomised controlled trial comparing home-based with centre-based cardiac rehabilitation , 2008, Heart.

[14]  D. Brooks,et al.  A prospective comparison of cardiac rehabilitation enrollment following automatic vs usual referral. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[15]  D. Alter,et al.  Relationship between cardiac rehabilitation and survival after acute cardiac hospitalization within a universal health care system , 2009, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[16]  S. Rankin,et al.  The Effects of a Collaborative Peer Advisor/Advanced Practice Nurse Intervention: Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation and Rehospitalization in Older Adults After a Cardiac Event , 2007, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[17]  K. Sparks,et al.  Alternatives for cardiac rehabilitation patients unable to return to a hospital-based program. , 1993, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[18]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[19]  D. Stewart,et al.  Factors Affecting Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral by Physician Specialty , 2008, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention.

[20]  George A. Mensah,et al.  The atlas of heart disease and stroke , 2005 .

[21]  P. Comoss Improving Utilization of Cardiac Rehabilitation Services: Where to Start? , 2008, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[22]  D. Stewart,et al.  Increasing Access to Cardiac Rehabilitation , 2004 .

[23]  Y. Neuman,et al.  Coronary risk factor management in the framework of a community hospital-based ambulatory exercise training program. , 2004, Preventive cardiology.

[24]  A J Mourant,et al.  Home-based cardiac rehabilitation versus hospital-based rehabilitation: a cost effectiveness analysis. , 2007, International journal of cardiology.

[25]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[26]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Improving uptake and adherence in cardiac rehabilitation: literature review. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[27]  D. Stewart,et al.  Contribution of patient and physician factors to cardiac rehabilitation referral: a prospective multilevel study , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine.

[28]  Li Liang,et al.  Predictors of cardiac rehabilitation referral in coronary artery disease patients: findings from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines Program. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  A. Tod,et al.  'I'm still waiting...': barriers to accessing cardiac rehabilitation services. , 2002, Journal of advanced nursing.

[30]  N. Suskin,et al.  IMPROVING CARDIAC REHABILITATION (CR) PARTICIPATION IN WOMEN AND MEN, THE CR PARTICIPATION STUDY , 2007 .

[31]  D. Coyle,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation program delivery models in patients at varying cardiac risk, reason for referral, and sex , 2008, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[32]  J. Beckmann,et al.  Action control : from cognition to behavior , 1985 .

[33]  A. Maiorana,et al.  Physical activity for people with cardiovascular disease: recommendations of the National Heart Foundation of Australia , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.

[34]  P. Ades,et al.  Predictors of cardiac rehabilitation participation in older coronary patients. , 1992, Archives of internal medicine.

[35]  B. Murphy,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation program attendance after coronary artery bypass surgery: overcoming the barriers , 2008, The Medical journal of Australia.

[36]  Helen Stokes,et al.  Universal access: but when? Treating the right patient at the right time: access to cardiac rehabilitation. , 2006, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[37]  C. Lavie,et al.  Adverse psychological and coronary risk profiles in young patients with coronary artery disease and benefits of formal cardiac rehabilitation. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[38]  L. Scott Referral to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: intervention research at the patient, provider, and health system levels , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine.

[39]  C. Mulrow,et al.  Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[40]  D. Brooks,et al.  Referral to and discharge from cardiac rehabilitation: key informant views on continuity of care. , 2006, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[41]  D. Mant,et al.  General practice Randomised controlled trial of follow up care in general practice of patients with myocardial infarction and angina : final results of the Southampton heart integrated care project ( SHIP ) , 1999 .

[42]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invit , 2007, European heart journal.

[43]  P. Davidson,et al.  Barriers to participation in and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs: a critical literature review. , 2002, Progress in cardiovascular nursing.

[44]  T. Zeller,et al.  Summary of NICE guidance , 2011, Heart.

[45]  S. Joseph,et al.  Predicting attendance at cardiac rehabilitation: a review and recommendations , 2001 .

[46]  D. Brooks,et al.  Increasing patient-initiation of cardiac rehabilitation referral in female percutaneous coronary intervention patients. , 2005, Canadian journal of cardiovascular nursing = Journal canadien en soins infirmiers cardio-vasculaires.

[47]  A. Kapke,et al.  Use of Discharge-Worksheet Enhances Compliance with Evidence-Based Myocardial Infarction Care , 2002, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[48]  Antonio Pflüger,et al.  Executive Summary. , 2012, Journal of the ICRU.

[49]  D. Shepard,et al.  System‐Level Factors and Use of Cardiac Rehabilitation , 2008, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention.

[50]  P. Davidson,et al.  Reframing the dilemma of poor attendance at cardiac rehabilitation: an exploration of ambivalence and the decisional balance. , 2009, Journal of Clinical Nursing.

[51]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts) , 2007 .

[52]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[53]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  The importance of consistent, high-quality acute myocardial infarction and heart failure care results from the American Heart Association's Get with the Guidelines Program. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[54]  M. Williams Cardiovascular risk-factor reduction in elderly patients with cardiac disease. , 1996, Physical therapy.

[55]  Self-motivation: a driving force for elders in cardiac rehabilitation. , 1992, Geriatric nursing.

[56]  P. Boulay,et al.  Health-care consumption and recurrent myocardial infarction after 1 year of conventional treatment versus short- and long-term cardiac rehabilitation. , 2004, Preventive medicine.

[57]  M. Cohen,et al.  Availability bias in the management of myocardial infarction. , 2005, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[58]  K. Eagle,et al.  Quality improvement initiative and its impact on the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[59]  D. Stewart,et al.  Concordance of self- and program-reported rates of cardiac rehabilitation referral, enrollment and participation. , 2009, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[60]  H. Arthur,et al.  Effect of a postoperative telephone intervention on attendance at intake for cardiac rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 2005, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[61]  R. Chisin Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[62]  R. Gliklich,et al.  Get With the Guidelines for Cardiovascular Secondary Prevention , 2004 .

[63]  J. Sneep,et al.  With a summary , 1945 .

[64]  Al Ozonoff,et al.  Effect of an American Heart Association Get With the Guidelines program-based clinical pathway on referral and enrollment into cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[65]  D. Stewart,et al.  Increasing access to cardiac rehabilitation: automatic referral to the program nearest home. , 2004, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation.

[66]  D. Stewart,et al.  Physician management preferences for cardiac patients: factors affecting referral to cardiac rehabilitation. , 2004, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[67]  R. Robinson Economic Evaluation and Health Care Cost-effectiveness analysis , 2006 .

[68]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Provision, uptake and cost of cardiac rehabilitation programmes: improving services to under-represented groups. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[69]  J. Stone,et al.  Canadian guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation and atherosclerotic heart disease prevention: a summary. , 2001, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[70]  H. Arthur,et al.  Determinants of referral to cardiac rehabilitation programs in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review. , 2006, American heart journal.

[71]  M. Johnston,et al.  Increasing attendance at a cardiac rehabilitation programme: an intervention study using the Theory of Planned Behaviour , 2001 .

[72]  V. Roger,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: a review to understand barriers to participation and potential solutions. , 2005, Europa medicophysica.

[73]  B. Fletcher,et al.  PCNA: Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association , 2009, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[74]  A J Mourant,et al.  Home-based versus hospital-based rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: A randomized trial with preference arms--Cornwall Heart Attack Rehabilitation Management Study (CHARMS). , 2007, International journal of cardiology.

[75]  D. Stewart,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation II: referral and participation. , 2002, General hospital psychiatry.

[76]  I. Piña,et al.  AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Sports Medicine, American Physical Therapy Association, Canadian Associati , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[77]  J. Critchley,et al.  Mortality reductions in patients receiving exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation: how much can be attributed to cardiovascular risk factor improvements? , 2006, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[78]  Sharon-Lise T Normand,et al.  Use of Cardiac Rehabilitation by Medicare Beneficiaries After Myocardial Infarction or Coronary Bypass Surgery , 2007, Circulation.

[79]  K. Alexander,et al.  Testing an intervention to increase cardiac rehabilitation enrollment after coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[80]  R. Baker What is interface audit? , 1994, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[81]  D. Stewart,et al.  Contribution of patient and physician factors to cardiac rehabilitation enrollment: a prospective multilevel study , 2008, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[82]  N. Suskin,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention services in Ontario: recommendations from a consensus panel. , 2003, The Canadian journal of cardiology.