Hindi pseudo-incorporation

This paper argues that Hindi incorporation is, in fact, pseudo-incorporation, involving noun phrases rather than nouns. Furthermore, it shows that there is no requirement that the incorporated nominal surface as a morphological or even a syntactic unit with the verb. Such loosely aligned nominals can nevertheless be identified as incorporation on the basis of semantic intuitions having to do with number interpretation, anaphora, and certain properties typically associated with lexical processes. Contrary to standard assumptions, it is argued that the target of pseudo-incorporation is specified for number. Singular incorporated nominals in Hindi are shown to be semantically singular, with number neutrality arising as a consequence of interaction with aspectual operators. Taking aspectual information into account is also shown to have interesting implications for current approaches to the semantics of incorporation, one in which the incorporated nominal introduces a discourse referent, and one in which it functions as a predicate modifier. A closer look at the effect of aspect on anaphora, for example, does not unequivocally support the predicate modification view of pseudo-incorporation. The paper draws on data from Hungarian, and to some extent Danish, to explore the cross-linguistic applicability of the claims made on the basis of Hindi. Most notably, a distinction between Hungarian verbs with respect to incorporation of bare singulars provides striking confirmation of the claim that number morphology is semantically visible in pseudo-incorporation. It also addresses restrictions on the productivity of pseudo-incorporation in light of the proposed analysis of pseudo-incorporation.

[1]  Ash Asudeh,et al.  1 Incorporation in Danish : Implications for interfaces , 2003 .

[2]  Mürvet Enç The semantics of specificity , 1991 .

[3]  Michael T. Wescoat,et al.  Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , 1983 .

[4]  Francis Jeffry Pelletier,et al.  The Generic book , 1997 .

[5]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The Generative Lexicon , 1995, CL.

[6]  Paul Elbourne,et al.  E-Type Anaphora as NP-Deletion , 2001 .

[7]  D. Farkas,et al.  The Semantics of Incorporation: From Argument Structure to Discourse Transparency , 2003 .

[8]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics , 1989 .

[9]  R. Bhatt Long Distance Agreement in Hindi-Urdu , 2005 .

[10]  Igor Yanovich,et al.  Incorporated nominals as antecedents for anaphora, or How to save the thematic arguments theory , 2008 .

[11]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[12]  Veerle van Geenhoven For -adverbials, Frequentative Aspect, and Pluractionality , 2004 .

[13]  Mürvet Enç,et al.  Tense without scope : an analysis of nouns as indexicals , 1986 .

[14]  Veneeta Dayal Number Marking and (in)Definiteness in Kind Terms , 2004 .

[15]  Peter Lasersohn Plurality, Conjunction and Events , 1994 .

[16]  Simin Karimi,et al.  Word order and scrambling , 2003 .

[17]  M. Mithun On the nature of noun incorporation , 1986 .

[18]  Michael White,et al.  Twigs, Sequences and the Temporal Constitution of Predicates , 2001 .

[19]  M. Krifka The Origins of Telicity , 1998 .

[20]  Tara Mohanan,et al.  Wordhood and lexicality: Noun incorporation in Hindi , 1995 .

[21]  Anoop Mahajan,et al.  The specificity condition and the CED , 1992 .

[22]  I. Sag,et al.  Incorporation in Danish: Implications for Interfaces a Collection of Papers on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar , 2022 .

[23]  Ashwini Deo Tense and Aspect in Indo-Aryan Languages: Variation and Diachrony , 2006 .

[24]  M. Mithun The evolution of noun incorporation , 1984 .

[25]  Robert A. Wilson,et al.  Book Reviews: The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences , 2000, CL.

[26]  Alice ter Meulen,et al.  Genericity: An Introduction , 1995 .

[27]  Veneeta Dayal,et al.  Bare Nominals: Non-Specific and Contrastive Readings under Scrambling , 2008 .

[28]  Vijay Gambhir,et al.  SYNTACTIC RESTRICTIONS AND DISCOURSE FUNCTIONS OF WORD ORDER IN STANDARD HINDI , 1981 .

[29]  Marcin Peski Categorization , 2006, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology.

[30]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  The Polysynthesis Parameter , 1995 .

[31]  Jerrold M. Sadock,et al.  Some notes on noun incorporation , 1986 .

[32]  Gregory Norman Carlson,et al.  Reference to kinds in English , 1977 .

[33]  Manindra K. Verma The Structure of the Noun Phrase in English and Hindi , 2008 .

[34]  S Carlota,et al.  Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague's PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel. , 2005 .

[35]  William A. Ladusaw,et al.  Restriction and Saturation , 2003 .

[36]  D. Massam Pseudo Noun Incorporation In Niuean , 2001 .

[37]  Helen Dehoop,et al.  Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation , 1996 .

[38]  Gregory Stump,et al.  The interpretation of frequency adjectives , 1981 .

[39]  J.F.A.K. van Benthem,et al.  Semantics and Contextual Expressions , 1989 .

[40]  Laurel Smith Stvan The semantics and pragmatics of bare singular noun phrases , 1998 .

[41]  I. Heim E-Type pronouns and donkey anaphora , 1990 .

[42]  Veneeta Dayal,et al.  Bare NP's, Reference to Kinds, and Incorporation , 1999 .

[43]  Gennaro Chierchia,et al.  Anaphora and dynamic binding , 1992 .

[44]  Beth Levin,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .

[45]  Maria Bittner,et al.  Case, scope, and binding , 1993 .

[46]  Jerrold M. Sadock,et al.  Noun incorporation in Greenlandic: A case of syntactic word formation , 1980 .

[47]  Susan Rothstein Events and Grammar , 2001 .

[48]  Michael T. Wescoat,et al.  On lexical sharing , 2002 .

[49]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Reference to Kinds across Language , 1998 .