The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is valid for monitoring quality of life in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Abstract Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We assessed the validity of administering the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General (FACT-G) at 12-month intervals over 3 years in a longitudinal study of 611 prospectively enrolled, newly diagnosed patients with NHL. We evaluated corrected item-total correlation and percent missing to identify items that may be less useful in certain NHL patient subgroups. The FACT-G subscales and total score demonstrated good internal consistency reliability, convergent validity and known-groups validity. Most scores also demonstrated good responsiveness to change. Questions that could be problematic included GE3 (losing hope) and GP2 (nausea) for patients in remission, and GP5 (bothered by side effects) for patients being observed. Overall, the FACT-G was a valid measure for monitoring QoL over time in patients with NHL. However, sensitivity analyses based on subscale scoring that excludes potentially problematic items may be warranted.

[1]  Charles R. Thomas,et al.  Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy , 2015 .

[2]  H. Vet,et al.  Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide , 2011 .

[3]  J. Cerhan,et al.  Vitamin D insufficiency and prognosis in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Chronic Disease Division Cancer facts and figures , 2010 .

[5]  P. Dagnelie,et al.  Determinants of overall quality of life in preterminal cancer patients , 2008, International journal of cancer.

[6]  Jinsook Kim,et al.  Measuring quality of life among cervical cancer survivors: preliminary assessment of instrumentation validity in a cross-cultural study , 2008, Quality of Life Research.

[7]  N. Shinton WHO Classification of Tumors of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues , 2007 .

[8]  J. Buckner,et al.  Validation of single-item linear analog scale assessment of quality of life in neuro-oncology patients. , 2007, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[9]  G. Y. Wong,et al.  Precision of health-related quality-of-life data compared with other clinical measures. , 2007, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[10]  D. Gustafson,et al.  Perceived helpfulness and impact of social support provided by family, friends, and health care providers to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer , 2007, Psycho-oncology.

[11]  P. Selby,et al.  A Rasch and factor analysis of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) , 2007, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[12]  D. Eton,et al.  Combining Distribution- and Anchor-Based Approaches to Determine Minimally Important Differences , 2005, Evaluation & the health professions.

[13]  J. Cashy,et al.  General Population and Cancer Patient Norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) , 2005, Evaluation & the health professions.

[14]  김환,et al.  Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)의 한국판 개발 및 타당화 , 2003 .

[15]  D. Cella,et al.  Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: Differences between improvement and worsening , 2002, Quality of Life Research.

[16]  J. Farrar,et al.  Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale , 2001, PAIN.

[17]  D. L. Fairclough,et al.  Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G): Non-response to individual questions , 1996, Quality of Life Research.

[18]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of Data Quality, Scaling Assumptions, and Reliability Across Diverse Patient Groups , 1994, Medical care.

[19]  D. Tulsky,et al.  The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  L. Crocker,et al.  Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory , 1986 .

[21]  J. Bachman,et al.  Effects of Questionnaire Length on Response Quality , 1981 .

[22]  J. Richard Andrews,et al.  Introduction to Classical Nahuatl , 1975 .

[23]  H. Vet,et al.  Measurement in Medicine: Index , 2011 .

[24]  J. Ware SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide , 2003 .

[25]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. , 1994 .

[26]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS social support survey. , 1991, Social science & medicine.