Integrated modeling of the major events in the MHC class I antigen processing pathway

Rational design of epitope‐driven vaccines is a key goal of immunoinformatics. Typically, candidate selection relies on the prediction of MHC–peptide binding only, as this is known to be the most selective step in the MHC class I antigen processing pathway. However, proteasomal cleavage and transport by the transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) are essential steps in antigen processing as well. While prediction methods exist for the individual steps, no method has yet offered an integrated prediction of all three major processing events. Here we present WAPP, a method combining prediction of proteasomal cleavage, TAP transport, and MHC binding into a single prediction system. The proteasomal cleavage site prediction employs a new matrix‐based method that is based on experimentally verified proteasomal cleavage sites. Support vector regression is used for predicting peptides transported by TAP. MHC binding is the last step in the antigen processing pathway and was predicted using a support vector machine method, SVMHC. The individual methods are combined in a filtering approach mimicking the natural processing pathway. WAPP thus predicts peptides that are cleaved by the proteasome at the C terminus, transported by TAP, and show significant affinity to MHC class I molecules. This results in a decrease in false positive rates compared to MHC binding prediction alone. Compared to prediction of MHC binding only, we report an increased overall accuracy and a lower rate of false positive predictions for the HLA‐A*0201, HLA‐B*2705, HLA‐A*01, and HLA‐A*03 alleles using WAPP. The method is available online through our prediction server at http://www‐bs.informatik.uni‐tuebingen.de/WAPP.

[1]  B. Matthews.  Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. , 1975, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[2]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[3]  H. Rammensee,et al.  Allele-specific motifs revealed by sequencing of self-peptides eluted from MHC molecules , 1991, Nature.

[4]  H. Rammensee,et al.  Peptide motifs of closely related HLA class I molecules encompass substantial differences , 1992, European journal of immunology.

[5]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Gamma-interferon and expression of MHC genes regulate peptide hydrolysis by proteasomes. , 1993, Nature.

[6]  K. Parker,et al.  Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[7]  D Rognan,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of MHC-peptide complexes as a tool for predicting potential T cell epitopes. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[8]  A. Goldberg,et al.  γ-lnterferon and expression of MHC genes regulate peptide hydrolysis by proteasomes , 1995, Nature.

[9]  A Sette,et al.  The peptide-binding motif for the human transporter associated with antigen processing , 1995, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[10]  K Eichmann,et al.  The proteolytic fragments generated by vertebrate proteasomes: structural relationships to major histocompatibility complex class I binding peptides. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  J. Neefjes,et al.  Translocation of long peptides by transporters associated with antigen processing (TAP) , 1996, European journal of immunology.

[12]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Two distinct proteolytic processes in the generation of a major histocompatibility complex class I-presented peptide. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Hans-Georg Rammensee,et al.  MHC Ligands and Peptide Motifs , 1998, Molecular Biology Intelligence Unit.

[14]  Vladimir Brusic,et al.  MHCPEP, a database of MHC-binding peptides: update 1996 , 1997, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  A Sette,et al.  Two complementary methods for predicting peptides binding major histocompatibility complex molecules. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  S Uebel,et al.  Recognition principle of the TAP transporter disclosed by combinatorial peptide libraries. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  V Brusic,et al.  Relationship between peptide selectivities of human transporters associated with antigen processing and HLA class I molecules. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[18]  V. Brusic,et al.  Neural network-based prediction of candidate T-cell epitopes , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Vladimir Brusic,et al.  A neural network model approach to the study of human TAP transporter , 1998, Silico Biol..

[20]  P. van Endert,et al.  Substrate selection by transporters associated with antigen processing occurs during peptide binding to TAP. , 1998, Molecular immunology.

[21]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Interferon-γ Can Stimulate Post-proteasomal Trimming of the N Terminus of an Antigenic Peptide by Inducing Leucine Aminopeptidase* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Making large scale SVM learning practical , 1998 .

[23]  P. Cresswell,et al.  Mechanisms of MHC class I--restricted antigen processing. , 1998, Annual review of immunology.

[24]  Vladimir Brusic,et al.  MHCPEP, a database of MHC-binding peptides: update 1996 , 1997, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  H Mamitsuka,et al.  Predicting peptides that bind to MHC molecules using supervised learning of hidden markov models , 1998, Proteins.

[26]  D. Rognan,et al.  Predicting binding affinities of protein ligands from three-dimensional models: application to peptide binding to class I major histocompatibility proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[27]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning , 1999 .

[28]  P. Kloetzel,et al.  A theoretical approach towards the identification of cleavage-determining amino acid motifs of the 20 S proteasome. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Gary D. Stormo,et al.  Identifying DNA and protein patterns with statistically significant alignments of multiple sequences , 1999, Bioinform..

[30]  S Uebel,et al.  Specificity of the proteasome and the TAP transporter. , 1999, Current opinion in immunology.

[31]  W. Baumeister,et al.  A giant protease with potential to substitute for some functions of the proteasome. , 1999, Science.

[32]  D. Watkins,et al.  Induction of HLA class I-restricted CD8+ CTLs specific for the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis in human genital tract infections. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[33]  H. Rammensee,et al.  SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs , 1999, Immunogenetics.

[34]  Christina Kuttler.  An Algorithm for the Prediction of Proteasomal Cleavages , 2000, German Conference on Bioinformatics.

[35]  O. Schueler‐Furman,et al.  Structure‐based prediction of binding peptides to MHC class I molecules: Application to a broad range of MHC alleles , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[36]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[37]  H. Margalit,et al.  Sequence signals for generation of antigenic peptides by the proteasome: implications for proteasomal cleavage mechanism. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[39]  Hans-Georg Rammensee,et al.  The Human 26 S and 20 S Proteasomes Generate Overlapping but Different Sets of Peptide Fragments from a Model Protein Substrate* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  J. Shabanowitz,et al.  Differences in the Expression of Human Class I MHC Alleles and Their Associated Peptides in the Presence of Proteasome Inhibitors1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[41]  K. Hadeler,et al.  PAProC: a prediction algorithm for proteasomal cleavages available on the WWW , 2001, Immunogenetics.

[42]  N. Shastri,et al.  ER aminopeptidases generate a unique pool of peptides for MHC class I molecules , 2001, Nature Immunology.

[43]  Robert Tampé,et al.  The transporter associated with antigen processing: function and implications in human diseases. , 2002, Physiological reviews.

[44]  Arne Elofsson,et al.  Prediction of MHC class I binding peptides, using SVMHC , 2002, BMC Bioinformatics.

[45]  S. Brunak,et al.  Prediction of proteasome cleavage motifs by neural networks. , 2002, Protein engineering.

[46]  A. Rickinson,et al.  TAP-independent antigen presentation on MHC class I molecules: lessons from Epstein-Barr virus. , 2003, Microbes and infection.

[47]  Concepción Marañón,et al.  An essential role for tripeptidyl peptidase in the generation of an MHC class I epitope , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[48]  Bjoern Peters,et al.  Identifying MHC Class I Epitopes by Predicting the TAP Transport Efficiency of Epitope Precursors , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[49]  S. Brunak,et al.  Predicting proteasomal cleavage sites: a comparison of available methods. , 2003, International immunology.

[50]  Manoj Bhasin,et al.  Analysis and prediction of affinity of TAP binding peptides using cascade SVM , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[51]  T. Boon,et al.  An Antigenic Peptide Produced by Peptide Splicing in the Proteasome , 2004, Science.

[52]  Jonathan W. Yewdell,et al.  Immune recognition of a human renal cancer antigen through post-translational protein splicing , 2004, Nature.

[53]  Jacques Neefjes,et al.  A major role for TPPII in trimming proteasomal degradation products for MHC class I antigen presentation. , 2004, Immunity.

[54]  Hans-Georg Rammensee,et al.  MHC ligands and peptide motifs: first listing , 2004, Immunogenetics.

[55]  Vladimir Brusic,et al.  Virtual models of the HLA class I antigen processing pathway. , 2004, Methods.

[56]  Hans-Georg Rammensee,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Prion-Protein Degradation by Constitutive and Immuno-20S Proteasomes Indicates Differences Correlated with Disease Susceptibility1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.