The Learning Office Approach to Modern 21st Century Education: Third Evaluation of a Self-Driven Concept for Student-Centered Engineering Education

This Research to Practice Full Paper presents the results of the third evaluation of the learning office approach, an alternative, self-driven branch introduced at the information technology department of an Austrian higher vocational upper secondary school encompassing grades 9 to 13 (K9-13). Learning office students benefit from a flexible class schedule, which allows them to choose time and depth for most school subjects and helps students develop valuable 21st century skills.The results revealed a highly significantly lower variance of the grade point average in the learning office at grade 12 and a ratio of sample variances of 3.534. Expert interviews held with ten teachers showed that the most mentioned advantages of the learning office approach were an improved self-reliance of the students, enabling individualization, and supporting weaker students. Furthermore, the teachers rated the learning office as the most promising approach of a set of 14 selected methods of learning. A course evaluation conducted with one learning office cohort showed that the structure of the chosen learning office subject was rated significantly better than the structure of the selected traditional subject. Finally, students of the learning office revealed a significantly lower number of absent lab days at grade 12 and a significant correlation between absent lab days and the grade point average was discovered. The findings confirm the learning office as viable approach to 21st century education.

[1]  Helen Soulé,et al.  Defining 21st century readiness for all students: What we know and how to get there. , 2015 .

[2]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  The Condition of education , 1975 .

[3]  Kamisah Osman,et al.  Instrument development for 21st century skills in Biology , 2011 .

[4]  Renate Motschnig,et al.  Effects of Introducing a Game-Based Student Response System into a Flipped, Person-Centered Classroom on Object-Oriented Design , 2018, ICWL.

[5]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  鈴木 寛,et al.  Google Classroom でできること , 2016 .

[7]  R. Motschnig,et al.  Fostering 21st Century Skills in Student-Centered Engineering Education at the Secondary School Level: Second Evaluation of The Learning Office , 2019, 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[8]  Renate Motschnig,et al.  Student-Centered Classrooms in Engineering Education: Concept and Evaluation of a Learning Office for Software Development and Applied Mathematics , 2018, 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[9]  สุธััญญา ด้วงอินทร์,et al.  Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day , 2017 .

[10]  Carl R. Rogers,et al.  Freedom to learn for the 80's , 1982 .

[11]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  21st-century digital skills instrument aimed at working professionals: Conceptual development and empirical validation , 2018, Telematics Informatics.

[12]  Cristóbal Cobo,et al.  Mechanisms to Identify and Study the Demand for Innovation Skills in World-Renowned Organizations , 2013 .

[13]  J. M. Kittross The measurement of meaning , 1959 .

[14]  K. Pearson VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents , 1895, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[15]  Charles K. Fadel,et al.  21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times , 2009 .

[16]  S. Kwak,et al.  Central limit theorem: the cornerstone of modern statistics , 2017, Korean journal of anesthesiology.

[17]  M. Albanese,et al.  Problem‐based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[18]  Alexander Johannes Aloysius Maria van Deursen,et al.  Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A large-scale survey among working professionals , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  S. Lim,et al.  Why Students Drop Out of School: A Review of 25 Years of Research , 2008 .

[20]  Chris Dede,et al.  Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century , 2013, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[21]  Christopher A Kearney,et al.  School absenteeism and school refusal behavior in youth: a contemporary review. , 2008, Clinical psychology review.

[22]  C. Spearman The proof and measurement of association between two things. , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.

[23]  Renate Motschnig,et al.  Person-Centered Learning using Peer Review Method - An Evaluation and a Concept for Student-Centered Classrooms , 2018, Int. J. Eng. Pedagog..

[24]  A third approach beyond the false dichotomy between teacher- and student-centred approaches in the engineering classroom , 2019, European Journal of Engineering Education.

[25]  J. Stephenson Visible learning and the science of how we learn , 2014 .

[26]  G. Koppensteiner,et al.  “We Can Learn Ourselves” - Developing Digital Media for Student-Centered Learning , 2019 .

[27]  G. Neave,et al.  Employability deconstructed: perceptions of Bologna stakeholders , 2016 .

[28]  C. Rogers A Theory of Therapy , Personality , and Interpersonal Relationships , as Developed in the Client-centered Framework , 2010 .

[29]  Kamal Eddine El Kadiri,et al.  Educational modeling of a learning management system , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Electrical and Information Technologies (ICEIT).