The decline of water hyacinth on Lake Victoria was due to biological control by Neochetina spp.

There has been some debate recently about the cause of the decline of water hyacinth on Lake Victoria. While much of this evidence points to classical biological control as the major factor, the El Nino associated weather pattern of the last quarter of 1997 and the first half of 1998 has confused the issue. We argue first that the reductions in water hyacinth on Lake Victoria were ultimately caused by the widespread and significant damage to plants by Neochetina spp., although this process was increased by the stormy weather associated with the El Nino event; second that increased waves and current on Lake Victoria caused by El Nino redistributed water hyacinth plants around the lake; and third that a major lake-wide resurgence of water hyacinth plants on Lake Victoria has not occurred and will not occur unless the weevil populations are disrupted. We conclude that the population crash of water hyacinth on Lake Victoria would not have occurred in the absence of the weevils, but that it may have been hastened by stormy weather associated with the El Nino event.

[1]  A. Greathead,et al.  Status of the water hyacinth in Uganda. , 1993 .

[2]  H. Groote,et al.  Economic impact of biological control of water hyacinth in Southern Benin , 2003 .

[3]  J. Wilson,et al.  Population regulation of a classical biological control agent larval density dependence in Neochetina eichhorniae Coleoptera Curculionidae, a biological control agent of water hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes , 2006, Bulletin of Entomological Research.

[4]  E. S. Delfosse.  Proceedings of the VII International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. , 1990 .

[5]  P. Neuenschwander,et al.  Impact of the weevils Neochetina eichhorniae and N. bruchi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes (Pontederiaceae), in Benin, West Africa , 2003 .

[6]  T. Center,et al.  Biological control of waterhyacinth in Sinaloa Mexico with the weevils Neochetina eichhorniae and N. bruchi , 2003, BioControl.

[7]  David Rosen,et al.  Pest management in the subtropics: biological control - a Florida perspective. , 1994 .

[8]  M. Julien,et al.  Biological Control of Water Hyacinth: The weevils Neochetima bruchi and N. eichhorniae Biologies, Host Ranges, and Rearing, Releasing and Monitoring Techniques for Biological Control of Eichhornia crassipes , 1999 .

[9]  Niels Holst,et al.  Determinants and patterns of population growth in water hyacinth , 2005 .

[10]  Marcus J. Byrne,et al.  Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa , 2003 .

[11]  P. Debach,et al.  Biological control of insect pests and weeds , 1967 .

[12]  L. H. Allen,et al.  Evapotranspiration of vegetation of Florida: perpetuated misconceptions versus mechanistic processes. , 1997 .

[13]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Patterns of the Remnant Cichlid Fauna in Southern Lake Victoria , 1997 .

[14]  P. Agaba,et al.  Recent efforts in biological control of water hyacinth in the Kagera River headwaters of Rwanda. , 2001 .

[15]  Hamish C. Duthie,et al.  Water hyacinth in Lake Victoria: Why did it vanish so quickly and will it return? , 2005 .

[16]  Thomas P. Albright,et al.  The rise and fall of water hyacinth in Lake Victoria and the Kagera River basin, 1989-2001 , 2004 .

[17]  M. Hoddle,et al.  Biological control of invasive plants in the Eastern United States. , 2002 .

[18]  J. Ogwang,et al.  Threat of water hyacinth resurgence after a successful biological control program , 2004 .

[19]  T. Olckers,et al.  Biological control initiatives against water hyacinth in South Africa: constraining factors, success and new courses of action. , 2001 .