Ethical guidelines for publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle: update 2015

This article details the principles of ethical authorship and publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle (JCSM). At the time of submission to JCSM, the corresponding author, on behalf of all co‐authors, needs to certify adherence to these principles. The principles are as follows: all authors listed on a manuscript considered for publication have approved its submission and (if accepted) publication as provided to JCSM; no person who has a right to be recognized as author has been omitted from the list of authors on the submitted manuscript; no person who has a right to be recognized as author has been omitted from the list of authors on the submitted manuscript; the submitted work is original and is neither under consideration elsewhere nor that it has been published previously in whole or in part other than in abstract form; all authors certify that the work is original and does not contain excessive overlap with prior or contemporaneous publication elsewhere, and where the publication reports on cohorts, trials, or data that have been reported on before these other publications must be referenced; all original research work are approved by the relevant bodies such as institutional review boards or ethics committees; all conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, that may affect the authors' ability to present data objectively, and relevant sources of funding have been duly declared in the manuscript; the manuscript in its published form will be maintained on the servers of JCSM as a valid publication only as long as all statements in the guidelines on ethical publishing remain true; and If any of the aforementioned statements ceases to be true, the authors have a duty to notify the Editors of JCSM as soon as possible so that the available information regarding the published article can be updated and/or the manuscript can be withdrawn.

[1]  S. Anker,et al.  Ethical guidelines for authorship and publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle , 2010, Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle.

[2]  S. Anker,et al.  Efforts begin to sprout: publications in JCSM on cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle wasting receive attention , 2014, Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle.

[3]  S. Anker,et al.  Moving on up: the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle , 2015, Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle.

[4]  S. Anker,et al.  Prevalence, incidence and clinical impact of cachexia: facts and numbers—update 2014 , 2014, Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle.

[5]  M. Drezner,et al.  Maintaining the Trust of Physicians and the Public in the Medical Literature: Report of a Task Force on Scientific Publishing of Clinical Trials , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  Elizabeth Wager,et al.  Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: a Publisher's Perspective , 2006, International journal of clinical practice. Supplement.

[7]  M. Glick Whether industry-supported or otherwise, trust is key to the acceptance of all research. , 2010, Journal of the American Dental Association.