Socioeconomic status, education, and reproduction in modern women: An evolutionary perspective

Although associations between status or resources and reproduction are positive in premodern societies and also in men in modern societies, in modern women the associations are typically negative. We investigated how the association between socioeconomic status and reproductive output varies with the source of status and resources, the woman's education, and her age at reproductive onset (proxied by age at marriage). By using a large sample of US women, we examined the association between a woman's reproductive output and her own and her husband's income and education. Education, income, and age at marriage are negatively associated with a woman's number of children and increase her chances of childlessness. Among the most highly educated two‐thirds of the sample of women, husband's income predicts the number of children. The association between a woman's number of children and her husband's income turns from positive to negative when her education and age at marriage is low (even though her mean offspring number rises at the same time). The association between a woman's own income and her number of children is negative, regardless of education. Rather than maximizing the offspring number, these modern women seem to adjust investment in children based on their family size and resource availability. Striving for resources seems to be part of a modern female reproductive strategy—but, owing to costs of resource acquisition, especially higher education, it may lead to lower birthrates: a possible evolutionary explanation of the demographic transition, and a complement to the human capital theory of net reproductive output. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 22:578–587, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J. Lancaster,et al.  Does observed fertility maximize fitness among New Mexican men? , 1995, Human nature.

[2]  M. Wiederman Evolved gender differences in mate preferences: Evidence from personal advertisements , 1993 .

[3]  B. Gillespie,et al.  Life–history theory, fertility and reproductive success in humans , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Kevin M. Murphy,et al.  Human Capital, Fertility, and Economic Growth , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1994 .

[6]  L. Cronk,et al.  Low Socioeconomic Status and Female-Biased Parental Investment: The Mukogodo Example , 1989 .

[7]  R. Hopcroft Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States , 2006 .

[8]  J. Boone,et al.  More Status or More Children? Social Status, Fertility Reduction, and Long-Term Fitness , 1999 .

[9]  Richard A. Easterlin,et al.  Birth and Fortune: The Impact of Numbers on Personal Welfare , 1987 .

[10]  H. Harpending,et al.  Fitness in stratified societies , 1990 .

[11]  M. Mulder Optimizing offspring: the quantity–quality tradeoff in agropastoral Kipsigis , 2000 .

[12]  K. Hill,et al.  Life history theory and evolutionary anthropology , 2005 .

[13]  S. Hewlett Creating a Life: Professional Women and the Quest For Children , 2002 .

[14]  M. Zimmer,et al.  Men money and marriage: are high earners more prone than low earners to marry? , 1997 .

[15]  D. J. Kaa Options and sequences: Europe’s demographic patterns , 1997 .

[16]  R. Rindfuss,et al.  Education and the changing age pattern of American fertility: 1963–1989 , 1996, Demography.

[17]  Lawrence S. Sugiyama Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind , 2001 .

[18]  S. Kanazawa Can Evolutionary Psychology Explain Reproductive Behavior in the Contemporary United States? , 2003 .

[19]  R. Mace Reproducing in Cities , 2008, Science.

[20]  S. Lea,et al.  Why Are Modern Families Small? Toward an Evolutionary and Cultural Explanation for the Demographic Transition , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[21]  S. Morgan,et al.  Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis? , 2003, Demography.

[22]  G. Becker Chapter Title: a Theory of Marriage a Theory of Marriage , 2022 .

[23]  Kim Hill,et al.  Ache Life History: The Ecology and Demography of a Foraging People , 1995 .

[24]  Hillard Kaplan,et al.  A theory of fertility and parental investment in traditional and modern human societies , 1996 .

[25]  G. Moors,et al.  Recent trends in fertility and household formation in the industrialized world. , 2000 .

[26]  J. Lancaster,et al.  The evolutionary history of human parental investment in relation to population growth and social st , 1997 .

[27]  Thomas V Pollet,et al.  Natural Selection on Male Wealth in Humans , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[28]  Ronald Lee,et al.  The Demographic Transition: Three Centuries of Fundamental Change , 2003 .

[29]  George C. Williams,et al.  Natural Selection, the Costs of Reproduction, and a Refinement of Lack's Principle , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[30]  W. Robinson The economic theory of fertility over three decades. , 1997, Population studies.

[31]  M. Fieder,et al.  The effects of sex and childlessness on the association between status and reproductive output in modern society , 2007 .

[32]  R. Mace,et al.  Trade-offs in modern parenting: a longitudinal study of sibling competition for parental care , 2009 .

[33]  J. Stevenson,et al.  Reproductive Measures, Fitness, and Migrating Mennonites: An Evolutionary Analysis , 2004, Human biology.

[34]  M. Wiederman,et al.  Gender differences in mate selection criteria: Sociobiological or socioeconomic explanation?☆ , 1992 .

[35]  C. Simon,et al.  An evolutionary ecological perspective on demographic transitions: Modeling multiple currencies , 2002, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[36]  J. Hoem,et al.  Education and permanent childlessness: Austria vs. Sweden; a research note , 2008 .

[37]  V. Oppenheimer Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career-development process , 2003, Demography.

[38]  M. Shenk Testing three evolutionary models of the demographic transition: Patterns of fertility and age at marriage in urban South India , 2009, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[39]  T. Parkin Demography and Roman Society , 1992 .

[40]  T. Bereczkei,et al.  Mate choice, marital success, and reproduction in a modern society , 1996 .

[41]  Kellie J. Hagewen,et al.  Intended and Ideal Family Size in the United States, 1970-2002. , 2005, Population and development review.

[42]  William H. Bossert,et al.  Life Historical Consequences of Natural Selection , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[43]  P. Brunt,et al.  Italian Manpower 225 B.C.-A.D. 14. , 1972 .

[44]  U. Mueller Is There a Stabilizing Selection Around Average Fertility in Modern Human Populations , 2001 .

[45]  Joseph C. Carroll Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology , 2008 .

[46]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Status and Reproduction in Humans: New Evidence for the Validity of Evolutionary Explanations on Basis of a University Sample , 2005 .

[47]  R. Rindfuss,et al.  FERTILITY AND WOMEN'S EMPLOYMENT IN INDUSTRIALIZED NATIONS , 2000 .

[48]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[49]  Borgerhoff Mulder M Optimizing offspring: the quantity-quality tradeoff in agropastoral Kipsigis. , 2000, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[50]  J. Caldwell Theory of Fertility Decline , 1982 .

[51]  S. A. Barnett,et al.  The natural regulation of animal numbers , 1955 .

[52]  E. Voland Evolutionary ecology of human reproduction. , 1998, Annual review of anthropology.

[53]  Ruth Mace,et al.  When to have another baby: A dynamic model of reproductive decision-making and evidence from Gabbra pastoralists , 1996 .

[54]  L. Mealey The relationship between social status and biological success: A case study of the Mormon religious hierarchy , 1985 .

[55]  Ken R. Smith,et al.  Differential fitness costs of reproduction between the sexes , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  P. Turke Evolution and the demand for children. , 1989 .

[57]  M. Marini Women's Educational Attainment and the Timing of Entry into Parenthood. , 1984 .

[58]  John Evans The Roman Family , 1993 .

[59]  J. Lancaster,et al.  Evolutionary approach to below replacement fertility , 2002, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[60]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Revised birth and fertility rates for the United States, 2000 and 2001. , 2003, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[61]  Alan R. Rogers,et al.  Evolutionary economics of human reproduction , 1990 .

[62]  D. Lack The Significance of Clutch‐size , 2008 .

[63]  L. Coppola Education and Union Formation as Simultaneous in Italy and Spain , 2004 .

[64]  M. Mulder The demographic transition: are we any closer to an evolutionary explanation? , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[65]  V. Lummaa,et al.  When fecundity does not equal fitness: evidence of an offspring quantity versus quality trade-off in pre-industrial humans , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[66]  E. Voland Differential reproductive success within the Krummhörn population (Germany, 18th and 19th centuries) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[67]  Social and biological determinants of reproductive success in Swedish males and females born 1915–1929 , 2009 .

[68]  N. Chagnon,et al.  Life Histories, Blood Revenge, and Warfare in a Tribal Population , 1988, Science.

[69]  R. Mace The coevolution of human fertility and wealth inheritance strategies. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[70]  J. Stevenson Adaptation and human behavior: An anthropological perspective , 2002 .

[71]  A. Goodman,et al.  Social and biological determinants of reproductive success in Swedish males and females born 1915–1929 , 2009, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[72]  L. Coppola Education and union formation as simultaneous processes in Italy and Spain , 2003 .

[73]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  Do high-status people really have fewer children? , 2006, Human nature.