Transcranial Extracellular Impedance Control (tEIC) Modulates Behavioral Performances

Electric brain stimulations such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) electrophysiologically modulate brain activity and as a result sometimes modulate behavioral performances. These stimulations can be viewed from an engineering standpoint as involving an artificial electric source (DC, noise, or AC) attached to an impedance branch of a distributed parameter circuit. The distributed parameter circuit is an approximation of the brain and includes electric sources (neurons) and impedances (volume conductors). Such a brain model is linear, as is often the case with the electroencephalogram (EEG) forward model. Thus, the above-mentioned current stimulations change the current distribution in the brain depending on the locations of the electric sources in the brain. Now, if the attached artificial electric source were to be replaced with a resistor, or even a negative resistor, the resistor would also change the current distribution in the brain. In light of the superposition theorem, which holds for any linear electric circuit, attaching an electric source is different from attaching a resistor; the resistor affects each active electric source in the brain so as to increase (or decrease in some cases of a negative resistor) the current flowing out from each source. From an electrophysiological standpoint, the attached resistor can only control the extracellular impedance and never causes forced stimulation; we call this technique transcranial extracellular impedance control (tEIC). We conducted a behavioral experiment to evaluate tEIC and found evidence that it had real-time enhancement and depression effects on EEGs and a real-time facilitation effect on reaction times. Thus, tEIC could be another technique to modulate behavioral performance.

[1]  Sean M Montgomery,et al.  The Effect of Spatially Inhomogeneous Extracellular Electric Fields on Neurons , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  A. Antal,et al.  Increasing Human Brain Excitability by Transcranial High- Frequency Random Noise Stimulation , 2009, NeuroImage.

[3]  S. Sato,et al.  Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals , 2005, Neurology.

[4]  S. Schiff,et al.  Sensitivity of Neurons to Weak Electric Fields , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  D. McCormick.  Membrane Properties and Neurotransmitter Actions , 2004 .

[6]  A. Engel,et al.  Antiphasic 40 Hz Oscillatory Current Stimulation Affects Bistable Motion Perception , 2013, Brain Topography.

[7]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Enhances Individual Alpha Activity in Human EEG , 2010, PloS one.

[8]  Felipe Fregni,et al.  Polarity-Dependent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Central Auditory Processing , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Speech Facilitation by Left Inferior Frontal Cortex Stimulation , 2011, Current Biology.

[10]  Amber N. Baysinger.  Principles of Cognitive Neuroscience , 2015, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[11]  F. Dudek,et al.  Excitation of hippocampal pyramidal cells by an electrical field effect. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  D. McCormick,et al.  Endogenous Electric Fields May Guide Neocortical Network Activity , 2010, Neuron.

[13]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Electrical Stimulation of the Visual Cortex , 2008, Current Biology.

[14]  Debora Brignani,et al.  Is Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Effective in Modulating Brain Oscillations? , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  F. Gosselin,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Repetition Suppression to Unfamiliar Faces: An ERP Study , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  H. Möller,et al.  Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Changes Connectivity of Resting-State Networks during fMRI , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Valerie Kirsch,et al.  Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: A standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[19]  S. Reeves,et al.  A pilot study of the tolerability and effects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on pain perception. , 2011, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[20]  A. Antal,et al.  Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[21]  Ernst Fernando Lopes Da Silva Niedermeyer,et al.  Electroencephalography, basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields , 1982 .

[22]  F. H. Lopes da Silva,et al.  Biophysical aspects of EEG and magnetoencephalogram generation , 1998 .

[23]  A. Antal,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[24]  E.-J. Speckmann,et al.  Introduction of the neurophysiological basis of the EEG and DC potentials , 1993 .

[25]  A. Antal,et al.  Electrode-distance dependent after-effects of transcranial direct and random noise stimulation with extracephalic reference electrodes , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  Richard C. Dorf,et al.  Introduction to Electric Circuits , 1989 .

[27]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Comparing Cortical Plasticity Induced by Conventional and High-Definition 4 × 1 Ring tDCS: A Neurophysiological Study , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[28]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Direct Current Stimulation over V5 Enhances Visuomotor Coordination by Improving Motion Perception in Humans , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  J. Fermaglich.  Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .

[30]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Diminishing Risk-Taking Behavior by Modulating Activity in the Prefrontal Cortex: A Direct Current Stimulation Study , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Norbert Jaušovec,et al.  The influence of theta transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on working memory storage and processing functions. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[32]  Bruce Carter,et al.  Handbook Of Operational Amplifier Active RC Networks , 2001 .

[33]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Analysis and visualization of single‐trial event‐related potentials , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[34]  Claude Bédard,et al.  Generalized cable theory for neurons in complex and heterogeneous media. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[35]  Nadia Bolognini,et al.  Neuromodulation of multisensory perception: A tDCS study of the sound-induced flash illusion , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  D. Purves.  Principles of Cognitive Neuroscience , 2007 .

[37]  Allan W. Snyder,et al.  Facilitate Insight by Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation , 2011, PloS one.

[38]  M. Nitsche,et al.  The Importance of Timing in Segregated Theta Phase-Coupling for Cognitive Performance , 2012, Current Biology.

[39]  R. W. Turner,et al.  Extracellular fields influence transmembrane potentials and synchronization of hippocampal neuronal activity , 1984, Brain Research.

[40]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Noninvasive remote activation of the ventral midbrain by transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex , 2013, Translational Psychiatry.

[41]  A. Antal,et al.  Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[42]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  P. Nunez,et al.  Electric Fields and Currents in Biological Tissue , 2006 .

[44]  S. Jaberzadeh,et al.  Differential Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability by Different Current Densities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2013, PloS one.

[45]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Focal modulation of the primary motor cortex in fibromyalgia using 4×1-ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS): immediate and delayed analgesic effects of cathodal and anodal stimulation. , 2013, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[46]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[47]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Orchestrating neuronal networks: sustained after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation depend upon brain states , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[48]  W. Precht.  The synaptic organization of the brain G.M. Shepherd, Oxford University Press (1975). 364 pp., £3.80 (paperback) , 1976, Neuroscience.

[49]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Facilitation of Implicit Motor Learning by Weak Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex in the Human , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[51]  G. Shepherd.  The Synaptic Organization of the Brain , 1979 .

[52]  Norbert Jaušovec,et al.  Increasing working memory capacity with theta transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2014, Biological Psychology.

[53]  Marom Bikson,et al.  Cellular and Network Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Insights from Animal Models and Brain Slice , 2012 .