Interactions between amygdala central nucleus and the ventral tegmental area in the acquisition of conditioned cue‐directed behavior in rats

Rats orient to and approach localizable visual cues paired with food delivery. Previous studies from this laboratory show that the acquisition and expression of these learned cue‐directed responses depend on integrity of a system including the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) and the dorsolateral striatum (DLS). Other investigators have suggested that cue‐directed behaviors may also depend on interaction between CeA and the ventral striatum, perhaps via CeA projections to the ventral tegmental area (VTA). In Experiment 1, we examined the effects of unilateral lesions of CeA and/or VTA on rats’ acquisition of conditioned responses to visual cues paired with food. Contrary to the results of previous studies that examined interactions of CeA with either SNc or DLS, rats with contralateral disconnection lesions of CeA and VTA were unimpaired in their acquisition of cue‐directed responses. By contrast, rats with lesions of both structures in the same hemisphere failed to learn cue‐directed responses, but were normal in their acquisition of conditioned responses directed to the food cup. In Experiment 2, we attempted to characterize the influence of VTA on CeA by examining FOS induction in CeA by a visual cue for food in rats with unilateral lesions of VTA. The results suggested an excitatory influence of VTA on CeA in the presence of food cues. Implications of these results for brain circuits involved in learned orienting and incentive motivation are discussed.

[1]  S. J. Shammah-Lagnado,et al.  Organization of ventral tegmental area projections to the ventral tegmental area–nigral complex in the rat , 2008, Neuroscience.

[2]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Involvement of the central nucleus of the amygdala and nucleus accumbens core in mediating Pavlovian influences on instrumental behaviour , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[3]  M. Gallagher,et al.  Disconnection of the amygdala central nucleus and substantia innominata/nucleus basalis disrupts increments in conditioned stimulus processing in rats. , 1999, Behavioral neuroscience.

[4]  M. Tampakeras,et al.  Rewarding brain stimulation: role of tegmental cholinergic neurons that activate dopamine neurons. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  P. Holland,et al.  Dissociable effects of disconnecting amygdala central nucleus from the ventral tegmental area or substantia nigra on learned orienting and incentive motivation , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[6]  T. Robbins,et al.  Dissociable roles of the central and basolateral amygdala in appetitive emotional learning , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[7]  R. Wise,et al.  Opposite effects of unilateral forebrain ablations on ipsilateral and contralateral hypothalamic self-stimulation , 1987, Brain Research.

[8]  P. Holland,et al.  The central amygdala projection to the substantia nigra reflects prediction error information in appetitive conditioning. , 2010, Learning & memory.

[9]  Cathleen Conzales,et al.  Amygdalonigral pathway: An anterograde study in the rat with Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA‐L) , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  J. Deniau,et al.  Disinhibition as a basic process in the expression of striatal functions , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  Larry W. Swanson,et al.  Brain Maps: Structure of the Rat Brain , 1992 .

[12]  A. Jackson,et al.  Nucleus tegmenti pedunculopontinus: Efferent connections with special reference to the basal ganglia, studied in the rat by anterograde and retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase , 1983, Neuroscience.

[13]  P. Holland.  Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[14]  B. Everitt,et al.  Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex , 2002, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[15]  John R Martin,et al.  Direct comparison of projections from the central amygdaloid region and nucleus accumbens shell , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[16]  Vanessa McKenna,et al.  Amygdala central nucleus function is necessary for learning, but not expression, of conditioned auditory orienting. , 2005, Behavioral neuroscience.

[17]  M. Gallagher,et al.  The amygdala central nucleus and appetitive Pavlovian conditioning: lesions impair one class of conditioned behavior , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  W. Schultz.  Activity of dopamine neurons in the behaving primate , 1992 .

[19]  T. Robbins,et al.  Depletion of unilateral striatal dopamine impairs initiation of contralateral actions and not sensory attention , 1985, Nature.

[20]  P. Holland,et al.  Amygdala circuitry in attentional and representational processes , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Peter Dayan,et al.  A Neural Substrate of Prediction and Reward , 1997, Science.

[22]  T. Robbins,et al.  Nucleus accumbens dopamine depletion impairs both acquisition and performance of appetitive Pavlovian approach behaviour: implications for mesoaccumbens dopamine function , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[23]  P. Holland,et al.  Double dissociation of the effects of lesions of basolateral and central amygdala on conditioned stimulus‐potentiated feeding and Pavlovian‐instrumental transfer , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[24]  D. S. Zahm,et al.  Glutamatergic Afferents of the Ventral Tegmental Area in the Rat , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  T. Robbins,et al.  Limbic-Striatal Memory Systems and Drug Addiction , 2002, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[26]  Disconnection of the amygdala central nucleus and substantia innominata/nucleus basalis disrupts increments in conditioned stimulus processing in rats. , 1999 .

[27]  T. Robbins,et al.  The basolateral amygdala-ventral striatal system and conditioned place preference: Further evidence of limbic-striatal interactions underlying reward-related processes , 1991, Neuroscience.

[28]  R. Wise,et al.  Brain dopamine and reward. , 1989, Annual review of psychology.

[29]  P. Holland,et al.  The Role of an Amygdalo-Nigrostriatal Pathway in Associative Learning , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  P. Holland,et al.  Influence of visual conditioned stimulus characteristics on the form of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responding in rats. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[31]  M. Waraczynski.  The central extended amygdala network as a proposed circuit underlying reward valuation , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[32]  L. Swanson,et al.  The projections of the ventral tegmental area and adjacent regions: A combined fluorescent retrograde tracer and immunofluorescence study in the rat , 1982, Brain Research Bulletin.

[33]  S. Geisler,et al.  Afferents of the ventral tegmental area in the rat‐anatomical substratum for integrative functions , 2005, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  C. Bielajew,et al.  Interhemispheric involvement of the anterior cortical nuclei of the amygdala in rewarding brain stimulation , 2004, Brain Research.

[35]  W. Hauber,et al.  Inactivation of the ventral tegmental area abolished the general excitatory influence of Pavlovian cues on instrumental performance. , 2006, Learning & memory.

[36]  P. Veinante,et al.  Afferents to the GABAergic tail of the ventral tegmental area in the rat , 2009, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[37]  P. Holland,et al.  Role of Amygdalo-Nigral Circuitry in Conditioning of a Visual Stimulus Paired with Food , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.