Quantum amplification of mechanical oscillator motion

Improving precision with quantum amplification Quantum mechanically, an object can be described by a pair of noncommuting observables, typically by its position and momentum. The precision to which these observables can be measured is limited by unavoidable quantum fluctuations. However, the method of “squeezing” allows the fluctuations to be manipulated, while preserving the Heisenberg uncertainty relation. This allows improved measurement precision for one observable at the expense of increased fluctuations in the other. Burd et al. now show that an additional displacement of a trapped atom results in amplification of the squeezing and a further improvement in the precision with which the displacement can be determined (see the Perspective by Schleier-Smith). This technique should be useful for a number of applications in metrology. Science, this issue p. 1163; see also p. 1137 Quantum mechanical squeezing and amplification provide a route to improved precision measurements. Detection of the weakest forces in nature is aided by increasingly sensitive measurements of the motion of mechanical oscillators. However, the attainable knowledge of an oscillator’s motion is limited by quantum fluctuations that exist even if the oscillator is in its lowest possible energy state. We demonstrate a technique for amplifying coherent displacements of a mechanical oscillator with initial magnitudes well below these zero-point fluctuations. When applying two orthogonal squeezing interactions, one before and one after a small displacement, the displacement is amplified, ideally with no added quantum noise. We implemented this protocol with a trapped-ion mechanical oscillator and determined an increase by a factor of up to 7.3 (±0.3) in sensitivity to small displacements.

[1]  Maira Amezcua,et al.  Quantum Optics , 2012 .

[2]  K. R. Brown,et al.  Microwave quantum logic gates for trapped ions , 2011, Nature.

[3]  Von Welch,et al.  Reproducing GW150914: The First Observation of Gravitational Waves From a Binary Black Hole Merger , 2016, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[4]  J. Britton,et al.  Trapped Ion Quantum Information Processing with Squeezed Phonons. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[5]  Antonio-José Almeida,et al.  NAT , 2019, Springer Reference Medizin.

[6]  P. Knight,et al.  Introductory Quantum Optics: Frontmatter , 2004 .

[7]  V. Negnevitsky,et al.  Encoding a qubit in a trapped-ion mechanical oscillator , 2018, Nature.

[8]  King,et al.  Resolved-sideband Raman cooling of a bound atom to the 3D zero-point energy. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[9]  C. Monroe,et al.  Experimental Issues in Coherent Quantum-State Manipulation of Trapped Atomic Ions , 1997, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[10]  C. Caves Quantum Mechanical Noise in an Interferometer , 1981 .

[11]  M. Sillanpää,et al.  Squeezing of Quantum Noise of Motion in a Micromechanical Resonator. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[12]  H. Butt,et al.  Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: Technique, interpretation and applications , 2005 .

[13]  Wineland,et al.  Quantum-limited cooling and detection of radio-frequency oscillations by laser-cooled ions. , 1990, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[14]  Classical squeezing of an oscillator for subthermal noise operation. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[15]  Gregory S. Bentsen,et al.  Approaching the Heisenberg Limit without Single-Particle Detection. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[16]  Holstein‐Primakoff/Bogoliubov Transformations and the Multiboson System , 1995, quant-ph/9506025.

[17]  Börge Hemmerling,et al.  Precision spectroscopy by photon-recoil signal amplification , 2013, Nature Communications.

[18]  King,et al.  Generation of nonclassical motional states of a trapped atom. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[19]  Samuel L. Braunstein,et al.  Weak-force detection with superposed coherent states , 2002 .

[20]  Leigh S. Martin,et al.  Stroboscopic Qubit Measurement with Squeezed Illumination. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[21]  Onur Hosten,et al.  Measurement noise 100 times lower than the quantum-projection limit using entangled atoms , 2016, Nature.

[22]  Franco Nori,et al.  QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems , 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[23]  B. Lanyon,et al.  Entanglement-enhanced detection of single-photon scattering events , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[24]  Klauder,et al.  SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[25]  J. Teufel,et al.  Quantum Nondemolition Measurement of a Nonclassical State of a Massive Object , 2015, Physical review. X.

[26]  J. Britton,et al.  Ultrasensitive force and displacement detection using trapped ions , 2010, 1004.0780.

[27]  A. Clerk,et al.  Quantum squeezing of motion in a mechanical resonator , 2015, Science.

[28]  G. Hilton,et al.  Squeezed Vacuum Used to Accelerate the Search for a Weak Classical Signal , 2018, Physical Review X.

[29]  R. J. Lewis-Swan,et al.  Quantum-Enhanced Sensing Based on Time Reversal of Nonlinear Dynamics. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[30]  Mertz,et al.  Observation of squeezed states generated by four-wave mixing in an optical cavity. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[31]  J. P. Home,et al.  Quantum harmonic oscillator state synthesis by reservoir engineering , 2014, Science.

[32]  Kerry Vahala,et al.  Cavity opto-mechanics. , 2007, Optics express.