This article presents the consequences to librarians and teachers for the flattening of expertise, or the Google Effect. As blogs continue to fill the Web with the bizarre daily rituals and opinions of people who we would never bother speaking to at a party, let alone invite into our homes, there has never been a greater need to stress the importance of intelligence, education, credentials and credibility. The problem is not only accuracy, but also the mediocrity initiated through the Google Effect. The concern is not with the banality of information – there has always been a plurality of sources in the analogue environment. The concern is the lack of literacy skills and strategies to sort the trash from the relevant. This paper addresses not only the social choices about computer use and information literacy, but the intellectual choices we make in our professional lives as teachers and librarians. In such a time, the Google Effect raises stark questions about the value of reading, research, writing and scholarship.
[1]
Howard Klink.
Words and Music.
,
1976
.
[2]
Joshua Meyrowitz,et al.
No sense of place
,
1985
.
[3]
Dick Hebdige,et al.
Hiding in the light
,
1988
.
[4]
S. Turkle.
Life on the Screen
,
1995
.
[5]
Cerise Oberman.
Library Instruction: Concepts & Pedagogy in an Electronic Age
,
1996
.
[6]
Brendan Nelson,et al.
Higher education at the crossroads: an overview paper
,
2002
.
[7]
M. Brennan,et al.
The suppression of ethical dispositions through managerial governmentality: A habitus crisis in Australian higher education
,
2003
.
[8]
David V. Loertscher,et al.
The Digital School Library: A World-Wide Development and a Fascinating Challenge
,
2003
.