Probabilistic Evaluation and Filtering of Image Velocimetry Measurements

The recent technological advances in remote sensing (e.g., unmanned aerial vehicles, digital image acquisition, etc.) have vastly improved the applicability of image velocimetry in hydrological studies. Thus, image velocimetry has become an established technique with an acceptable error for practical applications (the error can be lower than 10%). The main source of errors has been attributed to incomplete intrinsic and extrinsic camera calibration, to non-constant frame rate and to spurious low velocities due to moving objects that are irrelevant to the streamflow. Some researchers have even employed probabilistic approaches (Monte Carlo simulations) to analyze the uncertainty introduced during the camera calibration procedure. On the other hand, the endogenous uncertainty of the image velocimetry algorithms per se has received little attention. In this study, a probabilistic approach is employed to systematically analyze this uncertainty. It is argued that this analysis may not only improve the performance of the image velocimetry methods but it can also provide information regarding the impact of the video recording conditions (e.g., low density of features, oblique camera angle, low resolution, etc.) on the accuracy of the estimated values. The suggested method has been tested in six case studies of which the data have been previously made publicly available by independent researchers.

[1]  R. Adrian,et al.  Scattering particle characteristics and their effect on pulsed laser measurements of fluid flow: speckle velocimetry vs particle image velocimetry. , 1984, Applied optics.

[2]  Jérôme Le Coz,et al.  Crowdsourced data for flood hydrology: Feedback from recent citizen science projects in Argentina, France and New Zealand , 2016 .

[3]  Matthew T Perks,et al.  Technical Note: advances in flash flood monitoring using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). , 2016 .

[4]  Salvatore Manfreda,et al.  An Evaluation of Image Velocimetry Techniques under Low Flow Conditions and High Seeding Densities Using Unmanned Aerial Systems , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[5]  Ichiro Fujita,et al.  Development of a non‐intrusive and efficient flow monitoring technique: The space‐time image velocimetry (STIV) , 2007 .

[6]  Flavia Tauro,et al.  Streamflow Observations From Cameras: Large‐Scale Particle Image Velocimetry or Particle Tracking Velocimetry? , 2017 .

[7]  Guillaume Dramais,et al.  Performance of image-based velocimetry (LSPIV) applied to flash-flood discharge measurements in Mediterranean rivers. , 2010 .

[8]  Panayiotis Dimitriadis,et al.  On the Uncertainty of the Image Velocimetry Method Parameters , 2020, Hydrology.

[9]  Volker Weitbrecht,et al.  Proof‐of‐concept for low‐cost and non‐contact synoptic airborne river flow measurements , 2017 .

[10]  B. Renard,et al.  Estimating the uncertainty of video‐based flow velocity and discharge measurements due to the conversion of field to image coordinates , 2021, Hydrological Processes.

[11]  Jérôme Le Coz,et al.  Towards harmonisation of image velocimetry techniques for river surface velocity observations , 2019, Earth System Science Data.

[12]  Hao-Che Ho,et al.  Considerations on direct stream flow measurements using video imagery: Outlook and research needs , 2011 .

[13]  Anton Kruger,et al.  Large-scale particle image velocimetry for flow analysis in hydraulic engineering applications , 1998 .

[14]  M. Detert How to Avoid and Correct Biased Riverine Surface Image Velocimetry , 2020, Water Resources Research.

[15]  D. Passoni,et al.  EVALUATION OF AIRBORNE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY APPROACHES USING LOW-COST UAVS IN RIVERINE ENVIRONMENTS , 2020 .

[16]  I. Fujita Discharge Measurements of Snowmelt Flood by Space-Time Image Velocimetry during the Night Using Far-Infrared Camera , 2017 .

[17]  Salvatore Manfreda,et al.  Emerging earth observing platforms offer new insights into hydrological processes , 2019 .

[18]  Q. Liao,et al.  Application of an automated LSPIV system in a mountainous stream for continuous flood flow measurements , 2016 .

[19]  F. B. Sprow EVALUATION OF RESEARCH EXPENDITURES USING TRIANGULAR DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS AND MONTE CARLO METHODS , 1967 .