Combat Injury Profile in Urban Warfare.

INTRODUCTION Combat ground maneuvers consist of various platforms and have several environmental characteristics, influenced by the terrain, the operational mission, and the force's capabilities. This study assesses data on injuries sustained during urban warfare, aiming to evaluate the relationship between injury characteristics, maneuver platform, and personal protective gear on the battlefield. MATERIALS AND METHODS IDF soldiers injured infantry soldiers from the "Cast Lead" and the "Protective Edge" operations in the Gaza Strip (2008-2009 and 2014, respectively) were divided into four groups according to the maneuver platform and the environment: mounted infantry (armored and unarmored vehicle) and dismounted infantry (urban and open area). The primary outcome was the severity of the injury, and the secondary outcome was the injured body part. RESULTS Overall, 588 casualties were included in the final analysis, of whom 507 were dismounted infantry soldiers (265 in open terrain and 242 in urban area) and 81 were mounted infantry soldiers (20 in unarmored and 61 were injured in armored vehicles). The Injury Severity Score was similar in all subgroups. Open terrain subgroups were found to have fewer head injuries and higher levels of lower extremity injuries, similar to the unarmored vehicle group. More facial injuries were documented in the urban area group. CONCLUSIONS The Injury Severity Score was not influenced by environmental protection. Although we found differences in the injured body parts, further studies on the exact mechanism of injury are needed to elucidate further the relationship and differences between the various platforms used and injuries seen in urban warfare, aiming for tailor-made protection.

[1]  T. Talmy,et al.  Femur fractures and hemorrhagic shock: Implications for point of injury treatment. , 2022, Injury.

[2]  K. Peleg,et al.  Ten-year reduction in thoracic injury-related mortality among Israel Defense Forces soldiers , 2021, BMJ military health.

[3]  R. Nadler,et al.  Ocular injuries incurred by Israeli defense forces during low-intensity conflicts. , 2020, Injury.

[4]  R. Nadler,et al.  The Israel Defense Forces Trauma Registry: 22 years of point-of-injury data. , 2020, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[5]  W. Hardy,et al.  A Military Case Review Method to Determine and Record the Mechanism of Injury (BioTab) from In-Theater Attacks. , 2019, Military medicine.

[6]  Patrick J. Gillich,et al.  Prominent Injury Types in Vehicle Underbody Blast. , 2019, Military medicine.

[7]  Jeremy W. Cannon,et al.  Dismounted Complex Blast Injuries: A Comprehensive Review of the Modern Combat Experience. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[8]  P. Belmont,et al.  Musculoskeletal Injuries in Iraq and Afghanistan: Epidemiology and Outcomes Following a Decade of War , 2016, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[9]  E. Baruch,et al.  Augmentation of point of injury care: Reducing battlefield mortality-The IDF experience. , 2016, Injury.

[10]  Vivian Charles McAlister,et al.  Cervical spine injury in dismounted improvised explosive device trauma. , 2015, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[11]  R. Lehman,et al.  Characteristics of combat-related spine injuries: a review of recent literature. , 2015, Military medicine.

[12]  Y. Kreiss,et al.  Moving forward with combat casualty care: the IDF-MC strategic force buildup plan "My Brother's Keeper". , 2014, The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ.

[13]  Hein Putter,et al.  Systematic review of the prevalence and characteristics of battle casualties from NATO coalition forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. , 2014, Injury.

[14]  J. Bader,et al.  The nature and extent of war injuries sustained by combat specialty personnel killed and wounded in Afghanistan and Iraq, 2003–2011 , 2013, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[15]  J. Clasper,et al.  Identifying future ‘unexpected’ survivors: a retrospective cohort study of fatal injury patterns in victims of improvised explosive devices , 2013, BMJ Open.

[16]  L. Blackbourne,et al.  Battlefield trauma care then and now: A decade of Tactical Combat Casualty Care , 2012, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[17]  J. Commandeur,et al.  Identical fracture patterns in combat vehicle blast injuries due to improvised explosive devices; a case series , 2012, BMC Emergency Medicine.

[18]  Joseph R Hsu,et al.  The effect of vehicle protection on spine injuries in military conflict. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[19]  Nicolas Newell,et al.  In-vehicle extremity injuries from improvised explosive devices: current and future foci , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  S. Brevard,et al.  Fractures of the Thoracolumbar Spine Sustained by Soldiers in Vehicles Attacked by Improvised Explosive Devices , 2009, Spine.

[21]  Arul Ramasamy,et al.  Injuries from roadside improvised explosive devices. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.

[22]  John F Kragh,et al.  Combat wounds in operation Iraqi Freedom and operation Enduring Freedom. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.