Differences between informational and transactional tasks in information seeking on the web

We examine the influence of task types on information-seeking behaviors on the Web by using screen capture logs and eye-movement data. Eleven participants performed two different types of web search, an informational task and a transactional task, and their think aloud protocols and behaviors were recorded. Analyses of the screen capture logs showed that the task type affected the participants' informationseeking behaviors. In the transactional task, participants visited more web pages than for the informational task, but their reading time for each page was shorter than in the informational task. A preliminary analysis of eye-movement data for nine participants revealed characteristics of the scanpaths followed in search result pages as well as the distribution of lookzones for each task.

[1]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Web Search: Public Searching of the Web , 2011, Information Science and Knowledge Management.

[2]  Carolyn Watters,et al.  A field study characterizing Web-based information-seeking tasks , 2007 .

[3]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  In Google We Trust: Users' Decisions on Rank, Position, and Relevance , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  Andrei Broder,et al.  A taxonomy of web search , 2002, SIGF.

[5]  John R. Anderson,et al.  What role do cognitive architectures play in intelligent tutoring systems , 2001 .

[6]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Exploratory search , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[7]  A. Spink,et al.  Web Search: Public Searching of the Web (Information Science and Knowledge Management) , 2005 .

[8]  Andrew Thatcher,et al.  Web search strategies: The influence of Web experience and task type , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[9]  Tommy Strandvall,et al.  Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research , 2009, INTERACT.

[10]  Edward Cutrell,et al.  An eye tracking study of the effect of target rank on web search , 2007, CHI.

[11]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Finding facts vs. browsing knowledge in hypertext systems , 1988, Computer.

[12]  Ling Xia,et al.  Eye tracking and online search: Lessons learned and challenges ahead , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in WWW search , 2004, SIGIR '04.

[14]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Eye tracking and online search: Lessons learned and challenges ahead , 2008 .

[15]  Robert J. K. Jacob,et al.  Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research : Ready to deliver the promises , 2002 .

[16]  Paul B. Kantor,et al.  A study of information seeking and retrieving. II. Users, questions, and effectiveness , 1988, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[17]  H. Hembrooke,et al.  In Google We Trust: Users' Decisions on Rank, Position and Relevancy in Google We Trust: Users' Decisions on Rank, Position and Relevancy in Google We Trust: Users' Decisions on Rank, Position and Relevancy , 2005 .

[18]  Diane Kelly,et al.  IMPLICIT FEEDBACK: USING BEHAVIOR TO INFER RELEVANCE , 2005 .

[19]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Task complexity affects information seeking and use , 1995 .

[20]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using Google , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[21]  Bryce Allen,et al.  Cognitive and task influences on Web searching behavior , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..