For Spacious Skies: Self-Separation with "Autonomous Flight Rules" in US Domestic Airspace

Autonomous Flight Rules (AFR) are proposed as a new set of operating regulations in which aircraft navigate on tracks of their choice while self-separating from traffic and weather. AFR would exist alongside Instrument and Visual Flight Rules (IFR and VFR) as one of three available flight options for any appropriately trained and qualified operator with the necessary certified equipment. Historically, ground-based separation services evolved by necessity as aircraft began operating in the clouds and were unable to see each other. Today, technologies for global precision navigation, emerging airborne surveillance, and onboard computing enable traffic conflict management to be fully integrated with navigation procedures onboard the aircraft. By self-separating, aircraft can operate with more flexibility and fewer flight restrictions than are required when using ground-based separation. The AFR concept proposes a practical means in which self-separating aircraft could share the same airspace as IFR and VFR aircraft without disrupting the ongoing processes of Air Traffic Control. The paper discusses the context and motivation for implementing self-separation in US domestic airspace. It presents a historical perspective on separation, the proposed way forward in AFR, the rationale behind mixed operations, and the expected benefits of AFR for the airspace user community.

[1]  Shahab Hasan,et al.  Initial Life -Cycle Cost/Benefit Assessments of Distributed Air/Ground Traffic Management Concept Elements , 2004 .

[2]  César Muñoz,et al.  A Criteria Standard for Conflict Resolution: A Vision for Guaranteeing the Safety of Self-Separation in NextGen , 2010 .

[3]  Shahab Hasan,et al.  AN INITIAL BENEFITS ASSESSMENT OF DISTRIBUTED AIR/GROU ND TRAFFIC MANAGEMEN T CONCEPT ELEMENTS , 2003 .

[4]  David J. Wing,et al.  Autonomous Flight Rules - A Concept for Self-Separation in U.S. Domestic Airspace , 2011 .

[5]  Paul Lee,et al.  Joint NASA Ames/Langley Experimental Evaluation of Integrated Air/Ground Operations for En Route Free Maneuvering , 2005 .

[6]  W. Cotton Formulation of the Air Traffic System as a Management Problem , 1973, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[7]  Brian T. Baxley,et al.  Impact of Pilot Delay and Non-Responsiveness on the Safety Performance of Airborne Separation , 2008 .

[8]  Lynne Martin,et al.  Comparison of Ground-Based and Airborne Function Allocation Concepts for NextGen Using Human-In-The-Loop Simulations , 2010 .

[9]  Bert G. J. Bakker,et al.  Safety risk simulation of an airborne self separati on concept of operation , 2007 .

[10]  Jacco M. Hoekstra,et al.  Designing for safety: the 'free flight' air traffic management concept , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Robert A. Vivona,et al.  A Flight Deck Decision Support Tool for Autonomous Airborne Operations , 2002 .

[12]  Mark G. Ballin OF DISTRIBUTED AIR / GROUND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT , 2002 .

[13]  Michael S. Nolan,et al.  Fundamentals of Air Traffic Control , 1990 .

[14]  Walter M. Hollister,et al.  Electronic Flight Rules: An Alternative Separation Assurance Concep , 1980 .

[15]  Brian T. Baxley,et al.  Safety Performance of Airborne Separation: Preliminary Baseline Testing , 2007 .