PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Numeracy and Decision Making

A series of four studies explored how the ability to comprehend and transform probability numbers relates to performance on judgment and decision tasks. On the surface, the tasks in the four studies appear to be widely different; at a conceptual level, however, they all involve processing numbers and the potential to show an influence of affect. Findings were consistent with highly numerate individuals being more likely to retrieve and use appropriate numerical principles, thus making themselves less susceptible to framing effects, compared with less numerate individuals. In addition, the highly numerate tended to draw different (generally stronger or more precise) affective meaning from numbers and numerical comparisons, and their affective responses were more precise. Although generally helpful, this tendency may sometimes lead to worse decisions. The less numerate were influenced more by competing, irrelevant affective considerations. Analyses showed that the effect of numeracy was not due to general intelligence. Numerical ability appears to matter to judgments and decisions in important ways.

[1]  E. Peters,et al.  THE FUNCTIONS OF AFFECT IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF PREFERENCES ( 2006 , 2008 .

[2]  Ellen Peters,et al.  The Construction of Preference: The Functions of Affect in the Construction of Preferences , 2006 .

[3]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  The Effect of Numerical Statements of Risk on Trust and Comfort with Hypothetical Physician Risk Communication , 2004, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[4]  Andrew F. Simon,et al.  Decision framing: moderating effects of individual differences and cognitive processing , 2004 .

[5]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[7]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  B. Rimer,et al.  General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[9]  P. Slovic,et al.  Violence Risk Assessment and Risk Communication: The Effects of Using Actual Cases, Providing Instruction, and Employing Probability Versus Frequency Formats , 2000, Law and human behavior.

[10]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Individual differences in framing and conjunction effects , 1998 .

[11]  Schneider,et al.  All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[12]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[13]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives , 1996 .

[14]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[15]  Sean A. Spence,et al.  Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[16]  S. Epstein Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[17]  S. Epstein,et al.  Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Improvement,et al.  Adult literacy in America : a first look at the results of the National Adult Literacy Survey , 1993 .

[19]  Virginia M. Richards,et al.  Distributional theories of impression formation , 1992 .

[20]  V. Reyna,et al.  Fuzzy-trace theory and children's acquisition of mathematical and scientific concepts , 1991 .

[21]  Lisa J. Evered,et al.  Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and its Consequences. , 1990 .

[22]  I. Levin,et al.  How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product , 1988 .

[23]  R. Zajonc Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .