Once an outsider, always an outsider? CEO origin, strategic change, and firm performance

In this study, we examine how the relationship between the level of strategic change in the pattern of resource allocation and firm performance differs between firms led by outside CEOs and those led by inside CEOs. Based on longitudinal data on the tenure histories of 193 CEOs who left office between 1993 and 1998, we find that the level of strategic change has an inverted U-shaped relationship with firm performance. As the level of change increases from slight to moderate, performance increases; as the level of change increases from moderate to great, performance declines. Further, we find that this inverted U-shaped relationship differs between firms led by outside CEOs and those led by inside CEOs. That is, both the positive effect of strategic change on firm performance when the level of change is relatively low and the negative effect of strategic change on firm performance when the level of change is relatively high are more pronounced for outside CEOs than for inside CEOs. Supplementary analyses also suggest that this difference between outside and inside CEOs exists in later years but not in the early years of CEO tenure. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Jamal Shamsie,et al.  Learning across the life cycle: Experimentation and performance among the hollywood studio heads , 2001 .

[2]  M. Hitt,et al.  Strategic Control Systems And Relative R&D Investment , 1988 .

[3]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  Ceo selection, succession, compensation and firm performance: A theoretical integration and empirical analysis , 1990 .

[4]  M. Tushman,et al.  Executive Succession and Organization Outcomes in Turbulent Environments: An Organization Learning Approach , 1992 .

[5]  S. Shortell,et al.  Changing generic strategies: Likelihood, direction, and performance implications , 1989 .

[6]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation , 1997 .

[7]  M. Huson,et al.  Managerial Succession and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[8]  N. Rajagopalan,et al.  WHEN THE KNOWN DEVIL IS BETTER THAN AN UNKNOWN GOD: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF RELAY CEO SUCCESSIONS , 2004 .

[9]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  A diametric forces model of strategic change: Assessing the antecedents and consequences of restructuring in the higher education industry , 1993 .

[10]  Nandini Rajagopalan,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF STRATEGIC CHANGE: A MULTI-LENS PERSPECTIVE AND INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK , 1997 .

[11]  Yan Zhang,et al.  The presence of a separate COO/president and its impact on strategic change and CEO dismissal , 2006 .

[12]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Revisiting the Performance Consequences of CEO Succession: The Impacts of Successor Type, Postsuccession Senior Executive Turnover, and Departing CEO Tenure , 2002 .

[13]  James N. Baron,et al.  Labor Pains: Change in Organizational Models and Employee Turnover in Young, High‐Tech Firms1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Who Shall Succeed? How CEO/Board Preferences and Power Affect the Choice of New CEOs , 1996 .

[15]  Huseyin Leblebici,et al.  How do interdependencies among human-capital deployment, development, and diversification strategies affect firms' financial performance? , 2005 .

[16]  Dan R. Dalton,et al.  TOP MANAGEMENT TURNOVER AND CEO SUCCESSION: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF TURNOVER ON PERFORMANCE , 1994 .

[17]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  CEO tenure and organizational performance: an intervening model , 2007 .

[18]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Turnaround Strategies for Mature Industrial-Product Business Units , 1983 .

[19]  Y. Zhang.  Information asymmetry and the dismissal of newly appointed CEOs: an empirical investigation , 2008 .

[20]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change , 1992 .

[21]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  Internationalization and Firm Governance: The Roles of CEO Compensation, Top Team Composition, and Board Structure , 1998 .

[22]  Lawrence R. Jauch,et al.  Short term financial success in large business organizations: The environment‐strategy connection , 1980 .

[23]  M. Sastry.  Problems and Paradoxes in a Model of Punctuated Organizational Change , 1997 .

[24]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[25]  James D. Westphal.  Collaboration in the Boardroom: Behavioral and Performance Consequences of CEO-Board Social Ties , 1999 .

[26]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  The Price of Change: The Role of CEO Compensation in Strategic Variation and Deviation From Industry Strategy Norms , 2000 .

[27]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION, STRATEGIC CHANGE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: A STUDY OF RAILROAD DEREGULATION , 1987 .

[28]  Edward Levitas,et al.  CEO Tenure And Company Invention Under Differing Levels of Technological Dynamism , 2005 .

[29]  Thomas G. Cummings,et al.  When New CEOs Succeed and Fail , 2003 .

[30]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[31]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. , 1990 .

[32]  Ad de Jong,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Study of Self-Managing Service Teams , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[33]  David J. Miller,et al.  How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure, and company performance , 2006 .

[34]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Succession as A Sociopolitical Process: Internal Impediments to Outsider Selection , 1993 .

[35]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  Organizational Change and Organizational Mortality. , 1986 .

[36]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[37]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[38]  N. Rajagopalan,et al.  Explaining New CEO Origin: Firm Versus Industry Antecedents , 2003 .

[39]  Margarethe F. Wiersema,et al.  Executive succession as an antecedent to corporate restructuring , 1995 .

[40]  Heather A. Haveman.  Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation , 1992 .

[41]  Henry Mintzberg.  Patterns in Strategy Formation , 1978, International Studies of Management & Organization.

[42]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage , 2004 .

[43]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[44]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration , 1992 .

[45]  T. Amburgey,et al.  Organizational Inertia and Momentum: A Dynamic Model Of Strategic Change , 1991 .

[46]  C. Lance.  Residual Centering, Exploratory and Confirmatory Moderator Analysis, and Decomposition of Effects in Path Models Containing Interactions , 1988 .

[47]  S Finkelstein,et al.  Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validation. , 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[48]  Deepak K. Datta,et al.  Industry structure and CEO characteristics: an empirical study of succession events , 1998 .

[49]  G. Carroll,et al.  Density Delay in the Evolution of Organizational Populations: A Model and Five Empirical Tests , 1989 .

[50]  James N. Baron,et al.  Inertia and Change in the Early Years: Employment Relations in Young, High Technology Firms , 1996 .