Problems and solutions of stent biofilm and encrustations: A review of literature.

A ureteral stent is a commonly implanted urological device in patients with urinary tract obstruction. The main role of these stents is to allow adequate drainage of urine from the kidney into the bladder. Individuals with strictures, tumors, or obstructions from urinary stones do not have adequate urine flow and require ureteral stents as a part of their treatment to avoid potential hydronephrosis and renal failure. Although ureteral stents are highly effective in treating urinary tract obstructions, they have associated morbidities, such as biofilm formation and encrustation. Researchers have studied about how to diminish these negative outcomes by developing novel stent materials. Different coatings and biomaterials have been developed to reduce bacterial adhesion and crystal deposition onto the stent surfaces. Moreover, new investigation technologies, such as microfluidic platforms and encrustation sensors, have been utilized to better study the stents. Biofilms and encrustations can stem from bacterial origins; therefore, understanding the urinary microbiome will also provide insight into the solutions for treating them. There are still some gaps in our knowledge regarding the exact underlying mechanisms of stent-associated biofilms and encrustation. Future studies should include continuous testing of novel stent biomaterials for safety and efficacy, developing new technologies for identifying and extracting biofilms, enriching the assessment of stent encrustation, and diving deeper into understanding the urinary microbiome.

[1]  R. Clayman,et al.  SURFACE-TREATED PELLETHANES: COMPARATIVE QUANTIFICATION OF ENCRUSTATION IN ARTIFICIAL URINE SOLUTION. , 2020, Journal of endourology.

[2]  Yan Li,et al.  A preliminary study on the role of Bacteroides fragilis in stent encrustation , 2020, World Journal of Urology.

[3]  R. Gerlach,et al.  A Microfluidic-Based Investigation of Bacterial Attachment in Ureteral Stents , 2020, Micromachines.

[4]  H. Rebl,et al.  Prevention of Encrustation on Ureteral Stents: Which Surface Parameters Provide Guidance for the Development of Novel Stent Materials? , 2020, Polymers.

[5]  Y. O. Danacıoğlu,et al.  Does duration of stenting increase the risk of clinical infection? , 2020, Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica.

[6]  A. Hodhod,et al.  The safety of ureteral stenting with the use of potassium citrate for management of renal uric acid stones , 2019, Urology annals.

[7]  Z. Okhunov,et al.  Comparison of silicone versus polyurethane ureteral stents: a prospective controlled study , 2019, BMC urology.

[8]  D. Lange,et al.  The Interaction of Urinary Components with Biomaterials in the Urinary Tract: Ureteral Stent Discolouration. , 2020, Journal of endourology.

[9]  D. Engeler,et al.  Detection of microbial colonization of the urinary tract of patients prior to secondary ureterorenoscopy is highly variable between different types of assessment: results of a prospective observational study , 2019, Biofouling.

[10]  S. Bolduc,et al.  Biological Assessment of Zn–Based Absorbable Metals for Ureteral Stent Applications , 2019, Materials.

[11]  H. Schmid,et al.  Symptoms associated with long-term Double-J ureteral stenting and influence of biofilms. , 2019, Urology.

[12]  Sebastian Strempel,et al.  Encrustations on ureteral stents from patients without urinary tract infection reveal distinct urotypes and a low bacterial load , 2019, Microbiome.

[13]  D. Schoeb,et al.  In Vitro Effects of a Novel Coating Agent on Bacterial Biofilm Development on Ureteral Stents. , 2019, Journal of endourology.

[14]  T. Muthukumar,et al.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for ureteral stent removal after kidney transplantation , 2019, Clinical transplantation.

[15]  H. Liu,et al.  Responses of human urothelial cells to magnesium-zinc-strontium alloys and associated insoluble degradation products for urological stent applications. , 2019, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[16]  B. Socea,et al.  The Risk Factors and Chemical Composition of Encrustation of Ureteral Double J Stents in Patients with Urolithiasis , 2019, Revista de Chimie.

[17]  D. Lange,et al.  Reducing deposition of encrustation in ureteric stents by changing the stent architecture: A microfluidic-based investigation , 2019, Biomicrofluidics.

[18]  M. Vedani,et al.  In Vitro Degradation of Absorbable Zinc Alloys in Artificial Urine , 2019, Materials.

[19]  D. Lange,et al.  The Role of Bacteria in Urology , 2019, Springer International Publishing.

[20]  H. Schmid,et al.  Influence of biofilms on morbidity associated with short-term indwelling ureteral stents: a prospective observational study , 2018, World Journal of Urology.

[21]  M. Cakici,et al.  The Association of Encrustation and Ureteral Stent Indwelling Time in Urolithiasis and KUB Grading System. , 2018, Urology journal.

[22]  A. R. Mulyukova,et al.  Noninvasive Ultrasonic Sanitation of Stents for Drainage of the Upper Urinary Tract , 2018, Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  D. Abt,et al.  Extraction of Biofilms From Ureteral Stents for Quantification and Cultivation-Dependent and -Independent Analyses , 2018, Front. Microbiol..

[24]  E. Goluch,et al.  Real-Time Monitoring of Urinary Encrustation Using a Quartz Crystal Microbalance. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[25]  A. El-Nahas,et al.  A randomized controlled trial comparing antimicrobial (silver sulfadiazine)-coated ureteral stents with non-coated stents , 2018, Scandinavian journal of urology.

[26]  M. Manzoor,et al.  Characteristics of bacterial colonization after indwelling double-J ureteral stents for different time duration , 2018, Urology annals.

[27]  R. Autorino,et al.  In vivo assessment of a novel biodegradable ureteral stent , 2018, World Journal of Urology.

[28]  S. Hultgren,et al.  Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options , 2015, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[29]  D. Lange,et al.  Ureteral stent-associated complications—where we are and where we are going , 2015, Nature Reviews Urology.

[30]  J. Rühe,et al.  Influence of the molecular structure of surface-attached poly(N-alkyl acrylamide) coatings on the interaction of surfaces with proteins, cells and blood platelets. , 2013, Macromolecular bioscience.

[31]  Ben H. Chew,et al.  Next generation biodegradable ureteral stent in a yucatan pig model. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[32]  D. Stickler,et al.  Crystalline bacterial biofilm formation on urinary catheters by urease-producing urinary tract pathogens: a simple method of control. , 2009, Journal of medical microbiology.

[33]  P. Conort,et al.  [Biomaterials used in contact with the urinary tract for urine drainage: catheters and ureteric stents]. , 2005, Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie.

[34]  Betsy Foxman,et al.  Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs. , 2002, The American journal of medicine.

[35]  C. Riedl,et al.  Bacterial Colonization of Ureteral Stents , 1999, European Urology.

[36]  Fourcade Ro Antibiotic prophylaxis with cefotaxime in endoscopic extraction of upper urinary tract stones: a randomized study. The Cefotaxime Cooperative Group. , 1990, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[37]  E R Yendt,et al.  Clinical and laboratory approaches for evaluation of nephrolithiasis. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[38]  J. L. Wilkerson,et al.  Clinical use of long-term indwelling silicone rubber ureteral splints inserted cystoscopically. , 1967, The Journal of urology.