Quality of life in lung cancer patients.

The quality of life of lung cancer patients is affected by several factors related to the patients, stage of disease and treatment characteristics. For small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), the treatment is generally aggressive, primarily based on chemotherapy. Treatment strategy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is strongly dependent on the stage of the disease and ranges from surgery to palliative chemotherapy. Over the last few years, very little progress has been made in terms of survival. Therefore, the effect of treatment on quality of life has become progressively more relevant. Among the instruments for measuring quality of life, there are some specifically developed for lung cancer, such as the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) LC-13 questionnaire, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-L) questionnaire and the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS). Up to now, few randomised clinical trials have correctly evaluated quality of life. There are evident pitfalls associated with the use of frequently non-validated tools, and poor methods of data analysis, but quality-of-life evaluation is crucial and should be addressed through well-planned and well-conducted prospective clinical trials.

[1]  J. Bogaerts,et al.  Phase III comparative study of high-dose cisplatin versus a combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  K. Roszkowski,et al.  A multicenter, randomized, phase III study of docetaxel plus best supportive care versus best supportive care in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic or non-resectable localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). , 2000, Lung cancer.

[3]  M. Jiroutek,et al.  Comparison of survival and quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin versus etoposide with cisplatin: results of an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  S. Barni,et al.  Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A randomized phase III study of the Italian Lung Cancer Project. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  R. Souhami,et al.  Mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: effects on survival and quality of life. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  F. Shepherd,et al.  Randomized study of taxotere (TAX) versus best supportive care (BSC) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy , 1999 .

[7]  J P Pignon,et al.  Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission. Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Overview Collaborative Group. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  S. Thongprasert,et al.  Relationship between quality of life and clinical outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC plus chemotherapy. , 1999, Lung cancer.

[9]  J. Carmichael,et al.  Topotecan versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine for the treatment of recurrent small-cell lung cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  G. Luporini,et al.  Effects of vinorelbine on quality of life and survival of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study Group. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  H. Welch,et al.  Preferences for chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: descriptive study based on scripted interviews , 1998, BMJ.

[12]  G. Giaccone,et al.  Randomized study of paclitaxel-cisplatin versus cisplatin-teniposide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  B. Bergman,et al.  Quality of life and survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving supportive care plus chemotherapy with carboplatin and etoposide or supportive care only. A multicentre randomised phase III trial. Joint Lung Cancer Study Group. , 1998, European journal of cancer.

[14]  R. Rudd,et al.  793 Five day oral etoposide treatment for advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC): Quality of life (QOL) assessment in a randomised comparison with intravenous chemotherapy , 1997 .

[15]  D. Girling Comparison of oral etoposide and standard intravenous multidrug chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer: a stopped multicentre randomised trial , 1996, The Lancet.

[16]  R. Gralla,et al.  Comparison of instruments for measuring quality of life in patients with lung cancer. , 1996, Seminars in oncology.

[17]  O. Brodin,et al.  Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trials , 1995 .

[18]  P Chomy,et al.  Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  R. Stephens,et al.  A randomised trial of three or six courses of etoposide cyclophosphamide methotrexate and vincristine or six courses of etoposide and ifosfamide in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). II: Quality of life. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. , 1993, British Journal of Cancer.

[20]  D. Osoba,et al.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  R. Figlin,et al.  Supportive care versus supportive care and combination chemotherapy in metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer. Does chemotherapy make a difference? , 1989, Cancer.

[22]  D. Girling,et al.  Improving survival without reducing quality of life in small-cell lung cancer patients by increasing the dose-intensity of chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support: results of a British Medical Research Council Multicenter Randomized Trial. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  A. Carrato,et al.  Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine-cisplatin versus etoposide-cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  E. Shaw,et al.  Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of cisplatin and etoposide plus megestrol acetate/placebo in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group study. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  S. Kaasa,et al.  The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) for use in lung cancer clinical trials. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. , 1994, European journal of cancer.