Validity of the detection of wheelchair propulsion as measured with an Activity Monitor in patients with spinal cord injury

Study design:Validation study.Objectives:An accelerometry-based Activity Monitor (AM) has proven to be a valid instrument to quantify mobility-related activities (lying, sitting, standing, walking, cycling, general (noncyclic) movement). The aim of this study was to assess whether, additional to other activities, wheelchair propulsion (hand-rim wheelchair propulsion and handbiking) can be validly detected by the AM in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting:Rehabilitation center.Methods:In all, 10 patients with SCI (aged 19–63 years; five patients with poor triceps strength and five patients with good triceps strength) participated. Patients performed a series of representative daily life activities (involving wheelchair propulsion and nonwheelchair propulsion activities), according to a standard protocol, in a seminatural setting. Continuous registrations of signals from body-fixed accelerometers were made and the AM output (after automatic analysis) was compared with visual analysis of simultaneously made video recordings (reference method). Validity scores (agreement, sensitivity, specificity) between the output of the AM and the video analysis were calculated.Results:Agreement, sensitivity and specificity for the detection of wheelchair propulsion were overall 92 (range, 87–96)%, 87 (76–99)% and 92 (85–98)%, respectively. Sensitivity was smaller in patients with poor triceps strength compared to patients with good triceps strength; 81 (76–89)% and 95 (89–99)%, respectively (P<0.01). Mean overestimation in duration of wheelchair propulsion by the AM was 3.9% (P<0.05).Conclusion:Besides already validated other activities, wheelchair propulsion (hand-rim wheelchair propulsion and handbiking) can be validly detected by the AM in patients with SCI, both with good and poor triceps strength. Therefore, the AM offers the possibility to obtain objective and detailed information on all major mobility-related activities performed by patients with SCI.Sponsorship:Stichting Rotterdams Kinderrevalidatie Fonds Adriaanstichting.

[1]  P. Veltink,et al.  Validity and reliability of measurements obtained with an "activity monitor" in people with and without a transtibial amputation. , 1998, Physical therapy.

[2]  G. Savić,et al.  The relationship between neurological level of injury and symptomatic cardiovascular disease risk in the aging spinal injured , 2001, Spinal Cord.

[3]  P. London.  Injury , 1969, Definitions.

[4]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Ambulatory accelerometry to quantify motor behaviour in patients after failed back surgery: a validation study , 1998, Pain.

[5]  G. Savić,et al.  Long-term survival in spinal cord injury: a fifty year investigation , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[6]  J B Bussmann,et al.  Validity of ambulatory accelerometry to quantify physical activity in heart failure. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[7]  J. B. J. Bussmann,et al.  Measuring daily behavior using ambulatory accelerometry: The Activity Monitor , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[8]  S. Sonoda,et al.  Functional assessment of patients with spinal cord injury: measured by the motor score and the Functional Independence Measure , 1996, Spinal Cord.

[9]  G. Maislin,et al.  Validity of functional independence measure scores. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[10]  W. Mechelen,et al.  CLUSTERING OF RISK FACTORS FOR CORONARY HEART DISEASE: THE LONGITUDINAL RELATIONSHIP WITH LIFESTYLE , 1998 .

[11]  P I Terasaki,et al.  Long-term survival. , 1988, Clinical transplants.

[12]  C. Inman.  Effectiveness of spinal cord Injury Rehabilitation , 1999 .

[13]  R. Waters,et al.  International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[14]  P. Manns,et al.  Determining the relation between quality of life, handicap, fitness, and physical activity for persons with spinal cord injury. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  R. Shephard,et al.  Relationship of impairment and functional ability to habitual activity and fitness following spinal cord injury , 1993, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[16]  Michelle E. Cohen,et al.  Characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure in traumatic spinal cord injury. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Quantification of physical activities by means of ambulatory accelerometry: a validation study. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[18]  H. Bussmann,et al.  Ambulatory monitoring of mobility-related activities in rehabilitation medicine , 1998 .

[19]  J. Perry,et al.  Temporal-spatial characteristics of wheelchair propulsion. Effects of level of spinal cord injury, terrain, and propulsion rate. , 1996, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[20]  L. Turner-Stokes,et al.  Can a Barthel score be derived from the FIM? , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[21]  J. Groothoff,et al.  Rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord lesions in the Netherlands: an epidemiological study , 1996, Spinal Cord.

[22]  Florence Thillet-Bice Pt.  Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2nd ed , 2001 .

[23]  Assessment of physical activity in inactive populations. , 1985, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[24]  D. Wade,et al.  The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? , 1988, International disability studies.

[25]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  Anaerobic power output and propulsion technique in spinal cord injured subjects during wheelchair ergometry. , 1994, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.