Visualizing and interacting with large-volume biodiversity data using client-server web-mapping applications: The design and implementation of antmaps.org

Abstract The rise of informatics has presented new opportunities for analyzing, visualizing, and interacting with data across the sciences, and biodiversity science is no exception. Recently, comprehensive datasets on the geographic distributions of species have been assembled that represent a thorough accounting of a given taxonomic group of species (e.g. birds, mammals, etc.), and which form critical tools for both basic biology and conservation. However, these databases present several challenges for visualization, interaction, and participation for users across a broad range of scientists and the public. In support of the development of a new comprehensive ant biodiversity database containing over 1.7 million records, we developed a new client–server web-mapping application, antmaps.org , to visualize and interact with the geographic distributions of all 15,050 ant species and aggregate patterns of their diversity and biogeography. Our application development approach was based on user-centered design principles of usability engineering, human-computer interaction, and cartography. The resulting application is highly focused on providing efficient and intuitive access to geographic biodiversity data using a client–server interaction that allows users to query and retrieve data on the fly. This is achieved with a backend solution to efficiently work with large volumes of geospatial data. The usability and utility of the final version of the application was measured based on effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction, and assessed using questionnaires, usability lab studies and surveys. While the development of antmaps.org was motivated by a particular ant biodiversity dataset, the basic framework, design, and functionality are not specific to ants and could be used to interact with biodiversity data of any taxonomic group.

[1]  Terry A. Slocum,et al.  Thematic cartography and geovisualization, 3rd Edition , 2008 .

[2]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[3]  Ming-Hsiang Tsou,et al.  Revisiting Web Cartography in the United States: the Rise of User-Centered Design , 2011 .

[4]  Jessie Kennedy,et al.  Vesper: Visualising species archives , 2014, Ecol. Informatics.

[5]  Steve Kelling,et al.  BirdVis: Visualizing and Understanding Bird Populations , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[6]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  User-Centered Design for Interactive Maps: A Case Study in Crime Analysis , 2015, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[7]  Matthew B. Jones,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities of Open Data in Ecology , 2011, Science.

[8]  Mike J. Smith Editorial: Summary of Activities 2013 , 2014 .

[9]  Mark Zastrow Data visualization: Science on the map , 2015, Nature.

[10]  Robert P. Guralnick,et al.  A web-based GIS tool for exploring the world's biodiversity: The Global Biodiversity Information Facility Mapping and Analysis Portal Application (GBIF-MAPA) , 2007, Ecol. Informatics.

[11]  B. Guénard,et al.  The Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics (GABI) database: synthesizing data on the geographic distribution of ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2017 .

[12]  P. Cardoso,et al.  The Azorean Biodiversity Portal: An internet database for regional biodiversity outreach , 2010 .

[13]  Alan Cooper,et al.  About Face 3: the essentials of interaction design , 1995 .

[14]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  HerbariaViz: A web-based client-server interface for mapping and exploring flora observation data , 2011, Ecol. Informatics.

[15]  Peter Fox,et al.  Changing the Equation on Scientific Data Visualization , 2011, Science.

[16]  R. Guralnick,et al.  Biodiversity informatics: automated approaches for documenting global biodiversity patterns and processes , 2009, Bioinform..

[17]  Sharon K Tindall-Ford,et al.  When two sensory modes are better than one , 1997 .

[18]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat , 2005, Nature.

[19]  Steve Kelling,et al.  Data-Intensive Science: A New Paradigm for Biodiversity Studies , 2009 .

[20]  Robert P Guralnick,et al.  Towards a collaborative, global infrastructure for biodiversity assessment , 2007, Ecology letters.

[21]  Mark Harrower,et al.  Addressing Map Interface Usability: Learning from the Lakeshore Nature Preserve Interactive Map , 2008 .

[22]  B. Guénard,et al.  Global phylogenetic structure of the hyperdiverse ant genus Pheidole reveals the repeated evolution of macroecological patterns , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  E. Wilson,et al.  Breaking out of biogeographical modules: range expansion and taxon cycles in the hyperdiverse ant genus Pheidole , 2015, Journal of biogeography.

[24]  Alan Paton,et al.  Biodiversity informatics and the plant conservation baseline. , 2009, Trends in plant science.

[25]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Global patterns of plant diversity and floristic knowledge , 2005 .

[26]  Winston A Hide,et al.  Big data: The future of biocuration , 2008, Nature.

[27]  Mark Harrower,et al.  Designing Better Map Interfaces: A Framework for Panning and Zooming , 2005, Trans. GIS.

[28]  D. Harris,et al.  Widespread mistaken identity in tropical plant collections , 2015, Current Biology.

[29]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[30]  Usda Nrcs The PLANTS Database , 2015 .

[31]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Global priorities for an effective information basis of biodiversity distributions , 2015, Nature Communications.

[32]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Integrating biodiversity distribution knowledge: toward a global map of life. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  W. Jetz,et al.  Global patterns and determinants of vascular plant diversity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  L. Joppa Technology for nature conservation: An industry perspective , 2015, Ambio.

[35]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection , 2014, Science.

[36]  R. Guralnick,et al.  BioGeomancer: Automated Georeferencing to Map the World's Biodiversity Data , 2006, PLoS biology.

[37]  Richard G. Donohue,et al.  Weevil Viewer: An interactive mapping application for geographic and phenological exploration of Wisconsin's primitive weevils , 2014 .

[38]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  An introduction to scientific research methods in geography & environmental studies , 2006 .

[39]  Bruce D. Patterson,et al.  The Status of the World's Land and Marine Mammals: Diversity, Threat, and Knowledge , 2008, Science.

[40]  Gennady L. Andrienko,et al.  Designing Visual Analytics Methods for Massive Collections of Movement Data , 2007, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[41]  V. Marx Biology: The big challenges of big data , 2013, Nature.

[42]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[43]  Protima Banerjee About Face 2.0: The Essentials of Interaction Design: Alan Cooper and Robert Reimann Published by John Wiley & Sons, 2003, 576 pp, ISBN 0764526413 , 2004 .

[44]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Interactive Map Interface Designs: A Case Study Integrating Usability Metrics with Eye-Movement Analysis , 2009 .

[45]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[46]  R. Dunn,et al.  Global models of ant diversity suggest regions where new discoveries are most likely are under disproportionate deforestation threat , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  A. Peterson,et al.  New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[48]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[49]  W. Adams,et al.  Digital technology and the conservation of nature , 2015, Ambio.

[50]  W. Jetz,et al.  Environmental and historical constraints on global patterns of amphibian richness , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  A Comparison of Questionnaires for Assessing Website Usability , 2004 .

[52]  Jeffrey A. Cardille,et al.  SFMN GeoSearch: An interactive approach to the visualization and exchange of point-based ecological data , 2009, Ecol. Informatics.

[53]  Steve Krug,et al.  Don't Make Me Think!: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability , 2000 .