Image analysis approach for identification of renal transplant rejection

Acute renal rejection is the most common reason for graft (transplanted kidney) failure after kidney transplantation, and early detection is crucial to survival of function in the transplanted kidney. The current techniques for early detection of acute renal rejection are not accurate. For example, clearances of inulin and DTPA require multiple blood and urine tests, and they provide information on both kidneys together, but not unilateral information. Moreover, biopsy (the gold standard for diagnosis of acute renal rejection after renal transplantation) could cause bleeding and infection. Also, the relatively small needle biopsies may lead to over- or underestimation of the extent of inflammation in the entire graft. Hence, a noninvasive and repeatable technique would not only be useful but is needed to ensure survival of transplanted kidneys. For this reason, we introduced a new non-invasive framework for automatic classification of normal and acute renal rejection transplants using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance images (DCE-MRI). In this paper, we introduce a new approach for the automatic classification of normal and acute rejection transplants from Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI). The proposed algorithm consists of three main steps; the first step isolates the kidney from the surrounding anatomical structures. In the second step, new motion correction models are employed to account for both the global and local motion of the kidney due to patient moving and breathing. Finally, the perfusion curves that show the transportation of the contrast agent into the tissue are obtained from the kidney and used in the classification of normal and acute rejection transplants. In this paper, we will focus on the second and third steps and the first step is shown in detail by A. El-Baz et al (2005).

[1]  Qing Ye,et al.  USPIO‐enhanced dynamic MRI: Evaluation of normal and transplanted rat kidneys , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in renal transplantation , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  J A Sethian,et al.  A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Ayman El-Baz,et al.  2D and 3D Shape Based Segmentation Using Deformable Models , 2005, MICCAI.

[5]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  Integrated registration of dynamic renal perfusion MR images , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 2004. ICIP '04..

[6]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Nonlinear anisotropic filtering of MRI data , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[7]  K. Rigg Renal transplantation: current status, complications and prevention. , 1995, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[8]  Elw Eelco Giele Computer methods for semi-automatic MR renogram determination , 2002 .

[9]  R Kikinis,et al.  Semiautomated ROI analysis in dynamic MR studies. Part I: Image analysis tools for automatic correction of organ displacements. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  Ravi Bansal,et al.  Segmentation of Dynamic N-D Data Sets via Graph Cuts Using Markov Models , 2001, MICCAI.