Lean and Six Sigma in acute care: a systematic review of reviews.

PURPOSE The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic review of literature reviews, summarizing how Lean and Six Sigma management techniques have been implemented in acute care settings to date, and assessing their impact. To aid decision makers who wish to use these techniques by identifying the sectors of activity most often targeted, the main results of the interventions, as well as barriers and facilitators involved. To identify areas of future research. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH A literature search was conducted, using eight databases. The methodological quality of the selected reviews was appraised with AMSTAR. A narrative synthesis was performed according to the guidelines proposed by Popay et al. (2006). Data were reported according to PRISMA. FINDINGS The literature search identified 149 publications published from 1999 to January 2015. Seven literature reviews were included into the systematic review, upon appraisal. The overall quality of the evidence was poor to fair. The clinical settings most described were specialized health care services, including operating suites, intensive care units and emergency departments. The outcomes most often appraised related to processes and quality. The evidence suggests that Lean and Six Sigma are better adapted to settings where processes involve a linear sequence of events. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS There is a need for more studies of high methodological quality to better understand the effects of these approaches as well as the factors of success and barriers to their implementation. Field studies comparing the effects of Lean and Six Sigma to those of other process redesign or quality improvement efforts would bring a significant contribution to the body of knowledge. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS Lean and Six Sigma can be considered valuable process optimization approaches in acute health care settings. The success of their implementation requires significant participation of clinical personnel from the frontline as well as clinical leaders and managers. More research is needed to better understand the factors of success and the barriers to their implementation, as well as their long-term impact. ORIGINALITY/VALUE This is the first broad systematic review of reviews, synthesizing data pertaining to implementation issues and results in acute care settings, to be published. It will benefit health care managers assessing the potential of these approaches and the potential drawbacks associated with their implementation. Moreover, it identifies directions for future research.

[1]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[2]  C. Teddlie,et al.  SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research , 2010 .

[3]  M. Kamp,et al.  Making cars and making health care: a critical review , 2010, The Medical journal of Australia.

[4]  Richard J Holden,et al.  Lean Thinking in emergency departments: a critical review. , 2011, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  A. Darzi,et al.  Systematic review of the application of quality improvement methodologies from the manufacturing industry to surgical healthcare , 2012, The British journal of surgery.

[6]  Ingrid M. Nembhard,et al.  Assessing the Evidence of Six Sigma and Lean in the Health Care Industry , 2010, Quality management in health care.

[7]  Mark Graban,et al.  Lean Hospitals: Improving Quality, Patient Safety, and Employee Satisfaction , 2008 .

[8]  M. Mccue,et al.  The performance of the leveraged buyout of the Hospital Corporation of America, Inc. , 2012, Health care management review.

[9]  J. Vest,et al.  A critical review of the research literature on Six Sigma, Lean and StuderGroup's Hardwiring Excellence in the United States: the need to demonstrate and communicate the effectiveness of transformation strategies in healthcare , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[10]  M. Clarke,et al.  Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[11]  Jeremy Grimshaw,et al.  AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  B. Calhoun,et al.  Patient access and clinical efficiency improvement in a resident hospital-based women's medicine center clinic. , 2007, The American journal of managed care.

[13]  J. Jernigan,et al.  Implementation of an Industrial Systems-Engineering Approach to Reduce the Incidence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection , 2008, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[14]  Paula H Song,et al.  How High-Performance Work Systems Drive Health Care Value: An Examination of Leading Process Improvement Strategies , 2012, Quality management in health care.

[15]  Rafikul Islam,et al.  Effects of Lean Six Sigma application in healthcare services: a literature review , 2013, Reviews on environmental health.

[16]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota way : 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer , 2004 .

[17]  James P. Womack,et al.  Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation , 1996 .

[18]  R. McAdam,et al.  A CRITICAL REVIEW OF SIX SIGMA: EXPLORING THE DICHOTOMIES , 2005 .

[19]  Bo Bergman,et al.  Lessons from Sweden’s first large-scale implementation of Six Sigma in healthcare , 2010 .

[20]  Pamela Mazzocato,et al.  Lean thinking in healthcare: a realist review of the literature , 2010, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[21]  A. Sohal,et al.  Readiness factors for lean implementation in healthcare settings--a literature review. , 2014, Journal of health organization and management.

[22]  Charles R. Gowen,et al.  Contrasting continuous quality improvement, Six Sigma, and lean management for enhanced outcomes in US hospitals , 2012 .

[23]  S. Winch,et al.  Making cars and making health care: a critical review , 2009, The Medical journal of Australia.

[24]  P. Kaboli,et al.  Guiding inpatient quality improvement: a systematic review of Lean and Six Sigma. , 2010, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[25]  T. Ingebrigtsen,et al.  Lean thinking in hospitals: is there a cure for the absence of evidence? A systematic review of reviews , 2014, BMJ Open.

[26]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  Qianmei Feng,et al.  Under the knife: a national survey of six sigma programs in US healthcare organizations. , 2008, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[28]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  Lean Solutions: How Companies and Customers Can Create Value and Wealth Together , 2005 .

[29]  K. Seidl,et al.  The Intersection of Evidence-Based Practice With 5 Quality Improvement Methodologies , 2012, The Journal of nursing administration.

[30]  H. Frankel,et al.  Use of corporate Six Sigma performance-improvement strategies to reduce incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections in a surgical ICU. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[31]  Melissa L Dougherty,et al.  Lean thinking across a hospital: redesigning care at the Flinders Medical Centre. , 2007, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[32]  S L Walston,et al.  Does reengineering really work? An examination of the context and outcomes of hospital reengineering initiatives. , 2000, Health services research.

[33]  A. Brennan,et al.  Can we use routine data to evaluate organizational change? Lessons from the evaluation of business process re-engineering in a UK teaching hospital , 2005, Health services management research.

[34]  Bozena Poksinska,et al.  The Current State of Lean Implementation in Health Care: Literature Review , 2010, Quality management in health care.

[35]  Claudia Wild,et al.  BEST PRACTICE IN UNDERTAKING AND REPORTING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS , 2002, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[36]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Business Process Change: A Study of Methodologies, Techniques, and Tools , 1997, MIS Q..

[37]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[38]  S. Barreto,et al.  Application of Six Sigma towards improving surgical outcomes. , 2008, Hepato-gastroenterology.

[39]  David Moher,et al.  Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.