Internal colonization pathways of potato plants by Erwinia carotovora ssp. atroseptica

Transmission of pectinolytic Erwinia species from infected mother tubers to daughter tubers has been studied mainly through detection tests, carried out at harvest, on limited samples of tubers produced by plants grown from artificially inoculated mother tubers. However, detection has not been performed on samples collected at different stages of crop development, in order to follow the contamination progress in different organs through the plants to the progeny tubers. In this study the bacterial contamination of progeny tubers was investigated by detecting Erwinia carotovora ssp. atroseptica in different symptomless plant organs (stolons, stems, progeny tubers) and in the parts with or without symptoms of diseased stems, collected at various stages of crop development. Infection levels in below- and above-ground organs of plants of two cultivars differing in their resistance to Erwinia, infected by either vacuum infiltration or sand wounding, were monitored throughout the growing season and at harvest using DAS-ELISA and PCR. Detection tests showed that healthy organs from symptomless plants were less frequently contaminated than symptomless organs from diseased plants, and that stolons were precociously and more frequently contaminated than stems and daughter tubers, irrespective of the health of the plant. Stem infections were shown to progress latently in the stem, bacteria usually being recovered 10–15 cm past visible lesions. In many cases, typical aerial stem-rot symptoms could be related to this upward movement of bacteria from the infected mother tuber. Daughter tubers without symptoms were shown to be frequently contaminated, usually at heel ends, suggesting internal contamination from mother tuber to progeny.

[1]  Andrivon,et al.  Development of symptoms caused by Erwinia carotovora ssp. atroseptica under field conditions and their effects on the yield of individual potato plants , 2000 .

[2]  J. Elphinstone,et al.  SENSITIVITY OF METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF RALSTONIA SOLANACEARUM IN POTATO TUBERS , 1998 .

[3]  B. Fraaije,et al.  Comparison of methods for detection of Erwinia carotovora ssp. atroseptica in progeny tubers derived from inoculated tubers of Solanum tuberosum L. , 1996 .

[4]  J. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Components of partial resistance to potato blackleg caused by pectolytic Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica and E. chrysanthemi , 1996 .

[5]  J. V. van Vuurde,et al.  Immunomagnetic separation of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica from potato peel extracts to improve detection sensitivity on a crystal violet pectate medium or by PCR. , 1996, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[6]  E. Smid,et al.  Detection of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica and Erwinia chrysanthemi in potato tubers using polymerase chain reaction , 1995 .

[7]  M. López,et al.  Serological characterization of potato isolates of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica and subsp. carotovora using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies , 1995 .

[8]  Michel C. M. Pérombelon,et al.  M.T. Gorris1 , 1995 .

[9]  L. Hyman,et al.  Serological methods to quantify potato seed contamination by Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica1 , 1995 .

[10]  S. H. Boer,et al.  PCR detection of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica associated with potato tissue. , 1995 .

[11]  L. J. Hyman,et al.  Characterization of monoclonal antibodies against Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica serogroup I: specificity and epitope analysis. , 1995, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[12]  D. Jones,et al.  Blackleg potential of potato seed: determination of tuber contamination by Erwinia carotovora subsp. Atroseptica by immunofluorescence colony staining and stock and tuber sampling , 1994 .

[13]  M. López,et al.  Characterization of Monoclonal Antibodies Specific for Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica and Comparison of Serological Methods for Its Sensitive Detection on Potato Tubers , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[14]  M. Vernon-Shirley,et al.  The development and use of monoclonal antibodies for detection of Erwinia , 1992 .

[15]  R. Bain,et al.  Blackleg development and tuber yield in relation to numbers of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica on seed potatoes. , 1990 .

[16]  R. Bain,et al.  Methods of testing potato cultivars for resistance to soft rot of tubers caused by Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica , 1988 .

[17]  A. Kelman,et al.  Use of monoclonal antibodies specific for pectate lyase as serological probes in the identification of soft rot Erwinia spp. , 1988 .

[18]  A. Kelman,et al.  Blackleg and other potato diseases caused by soft rot Erwinias: proposal for revision of terminology. , 1987 .

[19]  P. J. Read,et al.  A comparison of methods of seed tuber inoculation for assessing the susceptibility of potato cultivars to blackleg (Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica) in the field , 1986 .

[20]  L. Hyman,et al.  A rapid method for identifying and quantifying soft rot erwinias directly from plant material based on their temperature tolerances and sensitivity to erythromycin , 1986 .

[21]  D. H. Lapwood,et al.  A method for assessing the field susceptibility of potato cultivars to blackleg (Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica) , 1984 .

[22]  C. E. Quinn,et al.  Soft rot Erwinia bacteria in the atmospheric bacterial aerosol. , 1980 .

[23]  E. H. Barnes Bacterial Soft Rot , 1979 .

[24]  C. E. Quinn,et al.  Quantitative Studies on the Generation of Aerosols of Erwinia carotovora var. atroseptica by Simulated Raindrop Impaction on Blackleg‐infected Potato Stems , 1977 .