Phenological change in a spring ephemeral: implications for pollination and plant reproduction

Climate change has had numerous ecological effects, including species range shifts and altered phenology. Altering flowering phenology often affects plant reproduction, but the mechanisms behind these changes are not well-understood. To investigate why altering flowering phenology affects plant reproduction, we manipulated flowering phenology of the spring herb Claytonia lanceolata (Portulacaceae) using two methods: in 2011-2013 by altering snow pack (snow-removal vs. control treatments), and in 2013 by inducing flowering in a greenhouse before placing plants in experimental outdoor arrays (early, control, and late treatments). We measured flowering phenology, pollinator visitation, plant reproduction (fruit and seed set), and pollen limitation. Flowering occurred approx. 10 days earlier in snow-removal than control plots during all years of snow manipulation. Pollinator visitation patterns and strength of pollen limitation varied with snow treatments, and among years. Plants in the snow removal treatment were more likely to experience frost damage, and frost-damaged plants suffered low reproduction despite lack of pollen limitation. Plants in the snow removal treatment that escaped frost damage had higher pollinator visitation rates and reproduction than controls. The results of the array experiment supported the results of the snow manipulations. Plants in the early and late treatments suffered very low reproduction due either to severe frost damage (early treatment) or low pollinator visitation (late treatment) relative to control plants. Thus, plants face tradeoffs with advanced flowering time. While early-flowering plants can reap the benefits of enhanced pollination services, they do so at the cost of increased susceptibility to frost damage that can overwhelm any benefit of flowering early. In contrast, delayed flowering results in dramatic reductions in plant reproduction through reduced pollination. Our results suggest that climate change may constrain the success of early-flowering plants not through plant-pollinator mismatch but through the direct impacts of extreme environmental conditions.

[1]  Paul J. CaraDonna,et al.  Phenological shifts and the fate of mutualisms. , 2015, Oikos.

[2]  K. Stinson.  Effects of Snowmelt Timing and Neighbor Density on the Altitudinal Distribution of Potentilla diversifolia in Western Colorado, U.S.A , 2005 .

[3]  P. Mølgaard,et al.  Response to experimental warming in a population of Papaver radicatum in Greenland , 1997 .

[4]  A. Miller‐Rushing,et al.  Toward a synthetic understanding of the role of phenology in ecology and evolution , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  A. Ives,et al.  Pollinator effectiveness varies with experimental shifts in flowering time. , 2012, Ecology.

[6]  Daniel E. Schindler,et al.  CLIMATE CHANGE UNCOUPLES TROPHIC INTERACTIONS IN AN AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM , 2004 .

[7]  S. Strauss,et al.  Foliar Herbivory Affects Floral Characters and Plant Attractiveness to Pollinators: Implications for Male and Female Plant Fitness , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[8]  T. Mosquin.  Competition for pollinators as a stimulus for the evolution of flowering time , 1971 .

[9]  John Sibert,et al.  AD Model Builder: using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear models , 2012, Optim. Methods Softw..

[10]  Rebecca E. Irwin,et al.  Beyond biomass: measuring the effects of community‐level nitrogen enrichment on floral traits, pollinator visitation and plant reproduction , 2010 .

[11]  Paul J. CaraDonna,et al.  Shifts in flowering phenology reshape a subalpine plant community , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[13]  David W. Inouye,et al.  The ecological and evolutionary significance of frost in the context of climate change. , 2000 .

[14]  J. Thomson,et al.  Flowering phenology in subalpine meadows: does climate variation influence community co-flowering patterns? , 2010, Ecology.

[15]  A. B. Carroll,et al.  Drought stress, plant water status, and floral trait expression in fireweed, Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae). , 2001, American journal of botany.

[16]  Ørjan Totland,et al.  How does climate warming affect plant-pollinator interactions? , 2009, Ecology letters.

[17]  A. Jacquemart.  Pollen limitation in three sympatric species ofVaccinium (Ericaceae) in the Upper Ardennes, Belgium , 1997, Plant Systematics and Evolution.

[18]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change , 2012, Nature.

[19]  G. Yohe,et al.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems , 2003, Nature.

[20]  David W. Inouye,et al.  Phenology at High Latitudes , 2013 .

[21]  J. Overpeck,et al.  Dry Times Ahead , 2010, Science.

[22]  Jill T. Anderson,et al.  Plasticity in functional traits in the context of climate change: a case study of the subalpine forb Boechera stricta (Brassicaceae) , 2015, Global change biology.

[23]  James H. Brown,et al.  Toward a metabolic theory of ecology , 2004 .

[24]  A. Ives,et al.  Effects of experimental shifts in flowering phenology on plant-pollinator interactions. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[25]  N. Williams,et al.  Local habitat characteristics but not landscape urbanization drive pollinator visitation and native plant pollination in forest remnants , 2013 .

[26]  John Harte,et al.  SUBALPINE MEADOW FLOWERING PHENOLOGY RESPONSES TO CLIMATE CHANGE: INTEGRATING EXPERIMENTAL AND GRADIENT METHODS , 2003 .

[27]  R. Perez,et al.  Rejuvenation of a peach orchard in the highlands of Guatemala through integrated management , 1992 .

[28]  Marcel E. Visser,et al.  Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Experimental environmental change and mutualistic vs. antagonistic plant flower–visitor interactions , 2011 .

[30]  Michael D. Dettinger,et al.  Changes toward Earlier Streamflow Timing across Western North America , 2005 .

[31]  Rebecca E. Irwin,et al.  The effect of repeated, lethal sampling on wild bee abundance and diversity , 2015 .

[32]  J. Fyles,et al.  Effect of snow removal on leaf water potential, soil moisture, leaf and soil nutrient status and leaf peroxidase activity of sugar maple , 1994, Plant and Soil.

[33]  Paul J. CaraDonna,et al.  Phenological overlap of interacting species in a changing climate: an assessment of available approaches , 2013, Ecology and evolution.

[34]  J. Forrest.  Plant–pollinator interactions and phenological change: what can we learn about climate impacts from experiments and observations? , 2015 .

[35]  M. V. Price,et al.  EFFECTS OF EXPERIMENTAL WARMING ON PLANT REPRODUCTIVE PHENOLOGY IN A SUBALPINE MEADOW , 1998 .

[36]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[37]  J. Thomson,et al.  An examination of synchrony between insect emergence and flowering in Rocky Mountain meadows , 2011 .

[38]  Gregory J. McCabe,et al.  Associations of decadal to multidecadal sea-surface temperature variability with Upper Colorado River flow , 2007 .

[39]  L. Real,et al.  Effective mutualism between sequentially flowering plant species , 1979, Nature.

[40]  G. Douglas,et al.  The biosystematics, chemotaxonomy, and ecology of Claytonia lanceolata in western Washington , 1972 .

[41]  J. Thomson.  Flowering phenology, fruiting success and progressive deterioration of pollination in an early-flowering geophyte , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  O. Hoegh‐Guldberg,et al.  Ecological responses to recent climate change , 2002, Nature.

[43]  Anurag A. Agrawal,et al.  Evolution of plant resistance and tolerance to frost damage , 2004 .

[44]  L. Harder,et al.  Phenological associations of within‐ and among‐plant variation in gender with floral morphology and integration in protandrous Delphinium glaucum , 2012 .

[45]  C. Plateaux-Quénu.  Subsociality in halictine bees , 2008, Insectes Sociaux.

[46]  D. Inouye,et al.  Effects of climate change on phenology, frost damage, and floral abundance of montane wildflowers. , 2008, Ecology.

[47]  T. Mitchell-Olds,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity and adaptive evolution contribute to advancing flowering phenology in response to climate change , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  Nicholas J Gotelli,et al.  Food-Web Models Predict Species Abundances in Response to Habitat Change , 2006, PLoS biology.

[49]  J. Sherwood.  Experimentally simulating environmental change in a montane meadow system via reduced snowpack and passive warming: soil and plant responses , 2013 .

[50]  W. Wcislo,et al.  Solitary behavior in a high-altitude population of the social sweat bee Halictus rubicundus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[51]  S. Schneider,et al.  Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants , 2003, Nature.

[52]  G. Kudo,et al.  Early onset of spring increases the phenological mismatch between plants and pollinators. , 2013, Ecology.

[53]  C. Augspurger,et al.  Reconstructing patterns of temperature, phenology, and frost damage over 124 years: spring damage risk is increasing. , 2013, Ecology.

[54]  Eric Post,et al.  Warming, plant phenology and the spatial dimension of trophic mismatch for large herbivores , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.