The Temporal Impulse Response Underlying Saccadic Decisions

Models of perceptual decision making often assume that sensory evidence is accumulated over time in favor of the various possible decisions, until the evidence in favor of one of them outweighs the evidence for the others. Saccadic eye movements are among the most frequent perceptual decisions that the human brain performs. We used stochastic visual stimuli to identify the temporal impulse response underlying saccadic eye movement decisions. Observers performed a contrast search task, with temporal variability in the visual signals. In experiment 1, we derived the temporal filter observers used to integrate the visual information. The integration window was restricted to the first ∼100 ms after display onset. In experiment 2, we showed that observers cannot perform the task if there is no useful information to distinguish the target from the distractor within this time epoch. We conclude that (1) observers did not integrate sensory evidence up to a criterion level, (2) observers did not integrate visual information up to the start of the saccadic dead time, and (3) variability in saccade latency does not correspond to variability in the visual integration period. Instead, our results support a temporal filter model of saccadic decision making. The temporal impulse response identified by our methods corresponds well with estimates of integration times of V1 output neurons.

[1]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[2]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[3]  J. Findlay,et al.  Saccades to targets in three-dimensional space: Dependence of saccadic latency on target location , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Saccade-related activity in monkey superior colliculus. II. Spread of activity during saccades. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  A. Johnston,et al.  A unified account of three apparent motion illusions , 1995, Vision Research.

[6]  A UNIFIED ACCOUNT OF 3 APPARENT MOTION ILLUSIONS , 1995 .

[7]  R. H. S. Carpenter,et al.  Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements , 1995, Nature.

[8]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[9]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Saccade-related activity in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of burst and buildup cells. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  J. Schall,et al.  Neural Control of Voluntary Movement Initiation , 1996, Science.

[11]  P. H. Schiller On the specificity of neurons and visual areas , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[12]  R. Wurtz Vision for the control of movement. The Friedenwald Lecture. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  R. Shapley,et al.  Temporal-frequency selectivity in monkey visual cortex , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Hess,et al.  Estimating multiple temporal mechanisms in human vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[15]  A. V. van den Berg,et al.  Visual search of heading direction , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  R. Carpenter,et al.  Saccadic choice with asynchronous targets: evidence for independent randomisation , 2001, Vision Research.

[17]  J. Gold,et al.  Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of two-choice decisions. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  J. Gold,et al.  The Influence of Behavioral Context on the Representation of a Perceptual Decision in Developing Oculomotor Commands , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Shadlen,et al.  A role for neural integrators in perceptual decision making. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Temporal dynamics of early light adaptation. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[22]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Saccadic and perceptual performance in visual search tasks. I. Contrast detection and discrimination. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[23]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  The time course of visual information accrual guiding eye movement decisions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  R. Carpenter,et al.  Contrast, Probability, and Saccadic Latency Evidence for Independence of Detection and Decision , 2004, Current Biology.

[25]  Eugene McSorley,et al.  The remote distractor effect in saccade programming: channel interactions and lateral inhibition , 2005, Vision Research.