Risk Aversion Or Myopia? Choices in Repeated Gambles and Retirement Investments

We study how decision makers choose when faced with multiple plays of a gamble or investment. When evaluating multiple plays of a simple mixed gamble, a chance to win x or lose y, subjects show a sensitivity to the amount to lose on a single trial, holding the distribution of returns for the portfolio constant; that is, they display "myopic loss aversion." Many subjects who decline multiple plays of such a gamble will accept it when shown the resulting distribution. This analysis is applied to the problem of retirement investing. We show that workers invest more of their retirement savings in stocks if they are shown long-term (rather than one-year) rates of return.

[1]  P. Samuelson.  Risk and uncertainty: a fallacy of large numbers , 1963 .

[2]  P. Slovic,et al.  Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking , 1968 .

[3]  David E. Meyer,et al.  Risk-preference in coin-toss games , 1969 .

[4]  R. C. Merton,et al.  Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case , 1969 .

[5]  John W. Payne,et al.  Preferences among gambles with equal underlying distributions , 1971 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[7]  P. Samuelson.  LIFETIME PORTFOLIO SELECTION BY DYNAMIC STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING , 1969 .

[8]  J. E. Russo,et al.  The Value of Unit Price Information , 1977 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[11]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .

[12]  Lola L. Lopes.  Decision Making in the Short Run. , 1981 .

[13]  Henry Montgomery,et al.  Gambling decisions and information about expected value. , 1982 .

[14]  Amos Tversky,et al.  Risk: The Long and the Short. , 1983 .

[15]  Lola L. Lopes.  Risk and Distributional Inequality. , 1984 .

[16]  R. Mehra,et al.  THE EQUITY PREMIUM A Puzzle , 1985 .

[17]  Richard J. Zeckhauser,et al.  Proper risk aversion , 1987 .

[18]  Willem A. Wagenaar,et al.  Violation of utility theory in unique and repeated gambles , 1987 .

[19]  J. Poterba,et al.  Mean Reversion in Stock Prices: Evidence and Implications , 1987 .

[20]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[21]  R. Thaler,et al.  Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice , 1990 .

[22]  Gideon Keren,et al.  Additional tests of utility theory under unique and repeated conditions , 1991 .

[23]  Miles S. Kimball,et al.  Standard Risk Aversion , 1991 .

[24]  Donald A. Redelmeier,et al.  On the Framing of Multiple Prospects , 1992 .

[25]  R. Thaler,et al.  Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle , 1993 .

[26]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking , 1993 .

[27]  Olivier J. Blanchard,et al.  Movements in the Equity Premium , 1993 .

[28]  Christian Gollier.  Repeated optional gambles and risk aversion , 1996 .

[29]  Lola L. Lopes.  When Time Is of the Essence: Averaging, Aspiration, and the Short Run , 1996 .

[30]  M. Rabin.  Risk Aversion, Diminishing Marginal Utility, and Expected-Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem , 1997 .

[31]  R. Shiller,et al.  Valuation Ratios and the Long-Run Stock Market Outlook , 1998 .

[32]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .